Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Safety, security, the environment and shipping: The problem of making effective policies

  • 288 Accesses

  • 10 Citations

Abstract

This paper examines where problems of shipping policy jurisdiction between international, supra-national and national levels have occurred. These range across the issues of public goods — safety, security and environment— and show up inadequacies in the current shipping policy-making processes. New frameworks — commonly termed “polycentric governance” and “multi-level governance”— sensitive to the complexities of the maritime industry and its associated political structure urgently need to be adopted. The paper is based upon research work recently carried out across the European Union supported by a number of publications and will include examples from Greece, the United Kingdom, Spain, France and also the new member states. Suggestions for improvements in policy-making structures will be made and recommendations put forward for consideration by policy-makers in the maritime sector at all jurisdictional levels

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Australian Maritime Safety Agency. 2001.A Comparison of Single and Double Hull Tankers. Discussion Paper.

  2. Bache, I. and Flinders, M. (eds). 2004.Multi-level Governance. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

  3. Farrell, S. 2001. If it ain’t bust, don’t fix it: the proposed EU directive on market access to port services.Maritime Policy and Management 28(3): 307–313 Pt1.

  4. Hooghe, L. and G. Marks. 2003. Unravelling the central state, but how? Types of multilevel governance.American Political Science Review 97(2): 233–243.

  5. Intertanko. 2006. Spain bans single hull tankers.Intertanko Review. http://www.intertanko.com/templates/Page.aspx?id=35992.

  6. Lloyds List. 2004. BIMCO urges action to counter criminalisation of seafarers.Lloyds List. April 7th.

  7. Marks, G. 1993. Structural Policy and Multi-level Governance in the EC. In Cafruny A. and G. Rosenthal eds.The State of the European Community Vol. 2: The Maastricht Debates and Beyond. Longman: Harlow.

  8. Marks, G. and L. Hooghe. 2000. Optimality and authority; a critique of neo-classical theory.Journal of Common Market Studies 38: 795–816.

  9. —. 2004. Contrasting visions of multi-level governance. In Bache, I. and M. Flinders eds. 2004.Multi-level Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  10. Marks, G., L. Hooghe and K. Blank. 1996. European integration from the 1980s: state-centric v. multi-level governance.Journal of Common Market Studies 34(3): 341–378.

  11. McGuinness, M.D. 2005. Costs and challenges of polycentric governance.Workshop on Analyzing Problems of Polycentric Governance in the Growing EU. Berlin: Humboldt University.

  12. McGuinness, M.D. ed. 1999a.Polycentric Governance and Development. Chicago: University of Michigan Press.

  13. —. 1999b.Polycentricity and Local Public Economics. Chicago: University of Michigan Press.

  14. —. 2000.Polycentric Games and Institutions. Chicago: University of Michigan Press. Ostrom, E. 2001. Vulnerability and polycentric governance systems.Newsletter of the International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change, 3/2001.

  15. Picciotto, S. 1991. The internationalisation of the state.Capital and Class 43: 43–63.

  16. Scharpf, F.W. 1997. Introduction: The problem-solving capacity of multi-level governance.Journal of European Public Policy 4(4): 520–538.

  17. Scholte, J. 2004. Globalisation and Governance; From Statism to Polycentrism.CS-GR Working Paper 130/04. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation: Warwick, UK.

  18. Skelcher, C. 2005. Jurisdictional integrity, polycentrism and the design of democratic governance.Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions 18(1): 89–110.

  19. Tsebelis, G. and G. Garrett. 2001. The institutional foundations of inter-governmentalism and supra-nationalism in the European Union.International Organisation 55(2): 357–390.

  20. Wang, P. 2002. On the Viability of Polycentric Governance Theory and Approach to Contemporary China.Workshop on Political Theory and Analysis. Indiana University, USA.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Michael S. Roe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roe, M.S. Safety, security, the environment and shipping: The problem of making effective policies. WMU J Marit Affairs 7, 263–279 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03195135

Download citation

Keywords

  • Governance
  • Policy
  • Jurisdictions
  • Polycentric