WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 109–131 | Cite as

Risk analysis for RoPax vessels

  • Dimitris Konovessis
  • Dracos Vassalos
  • George Mermiris


The paper presents the results of a recent risk analysis study for RoPax vessels, carried out as part of the activities of the SAFEDOR Integrated Project. The objective of this study was to investigate the causes of hazards during RoPax operation and quantify, to the extent possible, their frequencies and consequences. Potential scenarios initially identified and prioritised during a Hazard Identification (HAZID) session were used in the process.

The work has been performed in accordance with the IMO FSA Guidelines (IMO 2002). A previous comprehensive study on the safety assessment of RoPax vessels sailing in North West European waters, covering the period until 1994, was used as the basis in putting together a high-level risk model for the current study. All scenarios are presented in the form of event trees, quantification of which is done on the basis of world-wide accident experience (from 1994 to2004), relevant past studies and judgment. The study estimates the risk of loss of life among passengers and crew (by calculating for each scenario the Individual Risk, the Potential Loss of Life — PLL and plotting the corresponding F-N curves), and compares them with current risk acceptance criteria. The resulting high-level risk model is used to provide recommendations for improvement in the form of proposed risk control options (RCOs).

Key words

Marine Accident Analysis Formal Safety Assessment Risk Acceptance Criteria 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aldwinckle, D.S. and D. Prentice. 1990. The Safety Record and Risk Analysis of Ro-Ro Passenger Ferries.Proceedings of the International Symposium on The Safety of Ro-Ro Passenger Ships, 26–27 April, London, 20 p.Google Scholar
  2. DNV Technica. 1996a.Safety Assessment of Passenger Ro-Ro Vessels. Main Report (Document Number: REP-T09-003), Joint North West European Project, 28.10.1996.Google Scholar
  3. -. 1996b.Safety Assessment of Passenger Ro-Ro Vessels. Appendices (Document Number: REP-T09-003A), Joint North West European Project, 28.10.1996.Google Scholar
  4. Kanerva, M. 2001. From Handy Size up to Large Cruise Ferries, elements required to design and build successful configurations.Proceedings of the Euro-Conference on Passenger Ship Design, Construction, Safety and Operation. October 2001, Crete, 83–112.Google Scholar
  5. International Maritime Organization (IMO), Maritime Safety Committee (MSC). 2000.Formal Safety Assessment: Decision Parameters including Risk Acceptance Criteria. MSC72/16, Submitted by Norway. London: IMO.Google Scholar
  6. —. 2002.Guidelines for Formal Safety Assessment (FSA)for use in the IMO rule-making process. MSC/Circ.1023. London: IMO.Google Scholar
  7. —. 2004.Large Passenger Ship Safety: FSA Study on Navigational Safety of Passenger Ships. MSC 78/4/2,6 February 2004, Submitted by Norway. London: IMO.Google Scholar
  8. SAFEDOR. 2005.Risk Evaluation Criteria. SAFEDOR Deliverable D4.5.2.Google Scholar
  9. -. 2006.HAZID for RoPax. SAFEDOR Deliverable D4.2.1.Google Scholar
  10. Vanem, E. and R. Skjong. 2004a. Collision and Grounding of Passenger Ships — Risk Assessment and Emergency Evacuations,Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Collision and Grounding of Ships. ICCGS 2004. October, Izu, Japan, 195–202.Google Scholar
  11. -. 2004b. Fire and Evacuation Risk Assessment for Passenger Ships.Proceedings of the 10 th International Conference on Fire Safety and Engineering, INTERFLAM 2004. July, Edinburgh, UK, 365–374.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© World Maritime University 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dimitris Konovessis
    • 1
  • Dracos Vassalos
    • 1
  • George Mermiris
    • 1
  1. 1.The Ship Stability Research CentreUniversities of Glasgow and StrathclydeGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations