Acta Theriologica

, Volume 48, Issue 3, pp 411–423 | Cite as

Spatial behaviour of adult male Alpine ibexCapra ibex ibex in the Gran Paradiso National Park, Italy

  • Francesca Parrini
  • Stefano Grignolio
  • Siriano Luccarini
  • Bruno Bassano
  • Marco Apollonio


During a two year preliminary study, the spatial organization of a group of male Alpine ibexCapra ibex ibex Linnaeus, 1758 was examined in the Gran Paradiso National Park, Western Italian Alps, Italy. From December 1995 to January 1998 we measured annual, seasonal home range and home range during the rut, plus altitudinal migration of 13 radio-collared adult Alpine ibex. The small annual home range size showed a traditional use of space, confirmed by the high overlapping values between home ranges of consecutive years: the ibex used the same places from year to year. This was also true during periods of rut. Home ranges closely overlapped in consecutive ruts, while their size changed from winter to winter. Snow cover limited the movements of the ibex; winter and spring home ranges were smaller than those in summer and autumn. Mean vertical movement patterns were similar in the two years, showing the highest values in summer and the lowest in spring. Space use was never proportional to availability for each altitudinal range.

Key words

Capra ibex radio-tracking home range rut altitudinal migration 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Byers C. R., Steinhorst R. K. and Krausman P. R. 1984. Clarification of a technique for analysis of utilization-availability data. The Journal of Wildlife Management 38: 541–545.Google Scholar
  2. Cederlund G. and Sand H. 1994. Home-range size in relation to age and sex in moose. Journal of Mammalogy 75: 1005–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Craighead J. J., Craighead F. G., Ruff R. L. and O’Gara B. W. 1973. Home ranges and activity patterns of nonmigratory elk of the Madison Drainage herd as determined by biotelemetry. Wildlife Monographs 33: 1–50.Google Scholar
  4. Escos J. and Alados C. L. 1991. Influence of weather and population characteristics of free-ranging Spanish ibex in the Sierra de Cazorla y Segura and in the eastern Sierra Nevada. Mammalia 55: 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Escos J. and Alados C. L. 1992. The home range of the Spanish ibex in spring and fall. Mammalia 56: 57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Festa-Bianchet M. 1986. Site fidelity and seasonal range use by bighorn rams. Canadian Journal of Zoology 64: 2126–2132.Google Scholar
  7. Festa-Bianchet M. 1988. Seasonal range selection in bighorn sheep: conflicts between forage quality, forage quantity, and predator avoidance. Oecologia 75: 580–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fox J. L., Sinha S. P. and Chundawat R. S. 1992. Activity patterns and habitat use of ibex in the Himalaya mountains of India. Journal of Mammalogy 73: 527–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Francisci F., Focardi F. and Boitani L. 1985. Male and female Alpine ibex: phenology of space use and herd size. [In: The biology and management of mountain ungulates. S. Lovari, ed]. Croom-Helm, London: 124–133.Google Scholar
  10. Georgii B. and Schroeder W. 1983. Home range and activity patterns of male red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) in the Alps. Oecologia 58: 238–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gonzalez G. 1994. Variations saisonničres dans l’utilisation du milieu par le Bouquetin ibérique selon l’âge et le sexe. Travaux scientifiques du Parc National de la Vanoise 18: 151–174.Google Scholar
  12. Grignolio S., Parrini F., Bassano B., Luccarini S. and Apollonio M. 2003. Habitat selection in adult males of Alpine ibex,Capra ibex ibex. Folia Zoologica 52: 113–120.Google Scholar
  13. Hamr J. 1985. Seasonal home range size and utilisation by female chamois (Rupicapra rupricapra L.) in northern Tyrol. [In: The biology and management of mountain ungulates. S. Lovari, ed]. Croom-Helm, London: 106–116.Google Scholar
  14. Harris S., Cresswell W. J., Forde P. G., Trewhella W. J., Wollard T. and Wray S. 1990. Home range analysis using radio-tracking data. A review of problems and techniques particularly as applied to the study of mammals. Mammal Review 20: 97–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hayne D. W. 1949. Calculation of size of home range. Journal of Mammalogy 30: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heezen K. and Tester J. R. 1967. Evaluation of radio tracking by triangulation with special reference to deer movements. The Journal of Wildlife Management 31: 124–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jacobs J. 1974. Quantitative measurement of food selection. Oecologia 14: 413–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kenward R. 1987. Wildlife radio tagging: equipment, field techniques and data analysis. Academic Press, London: 1–192.Google Scholar
  19. Kenward R. and Hodder K. H. 1996. Ranges V 2.01. An analysis system for biological location data. Institute of Terrestial Ecology, Wareham, U.K.: 1–65.Google Scholar
  20. Kernohan B. J., Millspaugh J. J., Jenks J. A. and Naugle D. E. 1998. Use of an adaptive kernel home-range estimator in a GIS environment to calculate habitat use. Journal of Environmental Management 53: 83–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Koubek P. and Hrabe V. 1996. Home range dynamics in the red deer (Cervus elaphus) in a mountain forest in central Europe. Folia Zoologica 45: 219–222.Google Scholar
  22. Krebs J. C. 1982. Ecological methodology. University of British Columbia, Harper Collins publishers, Vancouver: 1–654.Google Scholar
  23. Larter N. C. and Gates C. C. 1994. Home-range of wood bison: effects of age, sex, and forage availability. Journal of Mammalogy 75: 142–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Michallet J. 1994. Domaines vitaux et déplacements de Bouquetins des Alpes (Capra ibex L.) dans le massif de Belledonne-Sept-Laux: bilan de deux années de suivi télémetrique. Travaux Scientifiques du Parc National de la Vanoise 18: 239–248.Google Scholar
  25. Neu C. W., Byers C. R. and Peek J. M. 1974. A technique for analysis of utilization-availability data. The Journal of Wildlife Management 38: 541–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nievergelt B. 1966. Der Alpensteinbock (Capra ibex L.) in seinem Lebensraum. Ein ökologischer Vergleich. Mammalia Depicta. Verlag P. Parey, Hamburg und Berlin: 1–86.Google Scholar
  27. Pedrotti L., Tosi G., Facoetti R. and Piccinini S. 1995. Organization of a study using radio-tracking and analysis of home ranges: application to alpine ungulates. Supplemento Ricerca Biologia Selvaggina 23: 3–100. [In Italian]Google Scholar
  28. Peracino V. and Bassano B. 1993. Bilan de 30 années d’expériences de capture des Ongulés sauvages — Bouquetin des Alpes (Capra ibex ibex) et Chamois (Rupicapra r. rupicapra) dans le Parc National Gran Paradis (Italie). [In: Techniques de capture et de marquage des Ongules sauvages. D. Dubray, ed]. Actes du Symposium, Meze, 20–22 Mars 1990: 33–36.Google Scholar
  29. Picard K., Thomas D. W., Festa-Bianchet M. and Lanthier C. 1994. Bovid horns: an important site for heat loss during winter? Journal of Mammalogy 75: 710–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ratti P. 1981. Zur Hege des Steinwildes im Kanton Graubunden. Zeitschrift für Jagdwissenschaft 27: 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Raye G. 1994. L’utilisation de l’espace en hiver par le Bouquetin des Alpes (Capra ibex ibex) dans le Parc National de la Vanoise. Travaux Scientifiques du Parc National de la Vanoise 18: 205–538.Google Scholar
  32. Schmidt K. 1993. Winter ecology of nonmigratory alpine red deer. Oecologia 95: 226–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Siegel S. and Castellan N. J. Jr 1992. Non parametric statistics for behavioral sciences (II edition). McGraw-Hill, New York: 1–477.Google Scholar
  34. Staines B. W. 1974. A review of factors affecting deer dispersion and their relevance to management. Mammal Review 4: 79–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Terrier G., Bret E., Tron L. and Gonzalez G. 1991. Individual space use patterns obtained with tagged Alpine ibexes in the case of 3 relocation programs. [In: Ongules/Ungulates 91. Proceedings of the International Symposium, Toulouse, France, September 2–6, 1991. F. Spitz, G. Janeau, G. Gonzalez and S. Aulagnier, eds]. Toulouse: 309–315.Google Scholar
  36. Terrier G., Choisy J. P., Gauthier D., Michallet J. and Villaret J. C. 1994. Approche comparative des modalités d’occupation de l’espace par les populations de Bouquetin des Alpes françaises (Capra ibex L.). Travaux Scientifiques du Parc National de la Vanoise 18: 249–270.Google Scholar
  37. Terrier G. and Polaert F. 1990. Occupation de l’espace par le Bouquetin des Alpes (Capra ibex L.): une approche par différentes méthodes de suivi individuel. [In: Premiers résultats obtenus dans le Parc national du Mercantour. Proceedings of the International Meeting “Lo Stambecco delle alpi: realta attuale e prospettive”, Valdieri, Italy, 17–19 September 1987. T. Balbo, D. De Meneghi, P. G. Meneguz and L. Rossi, eds]. Valdieri: 39–51.Google Scholar
  38. Terrier G. and Rossi P. 1994. Le Bouquetin (Capra ibex ibex) dans les Alpes maritimes franco-italiennes: occupation de l’espace, colonisation et régulation naturelles. Travaux Scientifique du Parc National de la Vanoise 18: 271–288.Google Scholar
  39. Thor G. 1990. How can does get more food than bucks? Habitat use of roe deer in the Bavarian forest. [In: Transactions the 19th IUGB congress, Trondheim 1989. S. Myrberget, ed]. Trondheim 1: 49–52.Google Scholar
  40. Tron L., Terrier G., Colombini P. and Bret E. 1994. Déplacements de Bouquetins des Alpes au cours des douze premiers mois aprčs leur lâcher dans le parcs des Ecrins, du Mercantour et du Vercurs. Travaux Scientifiques du Parc National de la Vanoise 18: 291–320.Google Scholar
  41. Watson A. and Staines B. W. 1992. Differences in the quality of wintering areas used by female Red deer (Cervus elaphus) in Aberdeenshire. Journal of Zoology, London 37: 544–550.Google Scholar
  42. White G. C. and Garrot R. A. 1986. Effects of biotelemetry triangulation error on detecting habitat selection. The Journal of Wildlife Management 50: 509–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wiersema G. 1984. Seasonal use and quality assessment of ibex habitat. Acta Zoologica Fennica 172: 89–90.Google Scholar
  44. Wiersema G. and Schroeder W. 1985. How to find suitable ibex (Capra ibex L.) habitat using Landsat imagery. [In: The biology and management of mountain ungulates. S. Lovari, ed]. Croom-Helm, London: 226–230.Google Scholar
  45. Worton B. J. 1989. Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies. Ecology 70: 164–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Mammal Research Institute, Bialowieza, Poland 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francesca Parrini
    • 1
  • Stefano Grignolio
    • 1
  • Siriano Luccarini
    • 1
  • Bruno Bassano
    • 2
  • Marco Apollonio
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Zoology and Biological AnthropologyUniversity of SassariSassariItaly
  2. 2.Gran Paradiso National ParkTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations