Reproductive behaviour of free-ranging rural dogs in West Bengal, India
Reproductive behaviour of free-ranging dogsCanis familiaris Linnaeus, 1758 was studied in a village in the state of West Bengal, India. Increased synchronized breeding was the most striking feature of this study. October (late monsoon) represented the peak period of mating for the feral dogs. Of all courting males, only 41% were observed to mount and copulate. On average, each male mounted 5.47 ± 2.49 (mean ± SD) times per hour. Of all mountings, only 10% were successful matings, ie copulatory ties. There was a negative correlation between the number of courting males and the number of successful copulations. The average duration of copulatory tie was 15.73 ± 7.75 min. Several factors interrupting the duration of copulatory ties were identified. December was the peak period of pup rearing. Mean litter size was 5.70 ± 2.03 with a male-biased sex ratio 1.41:1. Only a single annual breeding cycle recorded here differed from the previous studies on European and American dogs. Mothers spent most of the time with their pups at the dens during the early stage of rearing. The duration of time spent at dens by mothers was minimum when the pups were highly mobile at the age of 10 weeks. The lactating mothers were observed to be more aggressive immediately following litter production. Typically, an old adult male remained near the den as a ‘guard’.
Key wordsCanis familiaris sexual behaviour copulatory tie breeding
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Adams E. G. P. 1949. Jungle memories: IV. Journal of Bombay Natural History Society 48: 645–655.Google Scholar
- Beck A. M. 1973. The ecology of stray dogs: a study of free-ranging urban animals. York Press, Baltimore: 1–98.Google Scholar
- Bekoff M. 1979. Scent-marking by domestic dogs. Biology of Behaviour 4: 123–139.Google Scholar
- Boitani L., Francisci F., Ciucci P. and Andreoli G. 1995. Population biology and ecology of feral dogs in Central Italy. [In: The domestic dog: Its evolution, behaviour and interactions with people. J. Serpell, ed]. Cambridge University Press, New York: 217–244.Google Scholar
- Gipson P. S. 1972. The taxonomy, reproductive biology, food habits, and range of wild canids (Canidae) in Arkansas. PhD thesis, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville: 1–196.Google Scholar
- Johnsingh A. J. T. 1982. Reproductive behaviour of the Dholes,Cuon alpinus (Canidae). Journal of Zoology, London 198: 443–463.Google Scholar
- Kleiman D. G. and Malcolm J. R. 1981. The evolution male parental investment in mammals. [In: Parental care of mammals. D. J. Gubernik and P. H. Klopfer, eds]. Plenum, New York: 347–387.Google Scholar
- Kruuk H. 1972. The spoted hyena: A study of predation and social behaviour. Chicago University Press, Chicago: 1–335.Google Scholar
- Macdonald D. W. and Carr G. M. 1995. Variation in the dog society: Between resource dispersion and social flux. [In: The domestic dog: Its evolution, behaviour and interactions with people. J. Serpell, ed]. Cambridge University Press, New York: 199–216.Google Scholar
- Nesbitt W. H. 1975. Ecology of a feral dog pack on a wildlife refuge. [In: The wild canids: their systematics, behavioural ecology and evolution. M. W. Fox, ed]. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York: 391–396.Google Scholar
- Pal S. K. 1999. Some aspects of ecology and behaviour of urban free-ranging dogs (Canis familiaris). PhD thesis, University of Burdwan, Burdwan: 1–125.Google Scholar
- World Health Organization 1988. Report of WHO consultation on dog ecology studies related to rabies control. WHO: Rabies Research 88: 25.Google Scholar