Acta Theriologica

, Volume 51, Issue 3, pp 327–336 | Cite as

Factors affecting wild boar abundance across an environmental gradient in Spain

  • Pelayo Acevedo
  • Marco A. Escudero
  • Rosa Muńoz
  • Christian Gortázar
Article

Abstract

The recent Europe-wide increase in wild boarSus scrofa, Linnaeus, 1758 abundance is undoubtedly due to many different factors, the relative importance of which differs from region to region. In Aragón (northeastern Spain), wild boar enlarged its distribution area eight times in the 1990s as compared with the century before, occupying the whole region. We studied wild boar abundance along an environmental gradient in Aragón to determine which factors are most responsible for its variation. Relative abundance of wild boars was estimated by catch-effort methods in 134 hunting estates (sampling units) for 5 consecutive hunting seasons. To characterise the environmental conditions, we quantified landscape composition and structure, topographical factors and climatic factors. Hunting pressure indices were also calculated for our sampling units. The average wild boar catch per hunting activity and per 100 km2 ranged from 0.72 to 16.31. Our results suggest thatwild boar abundances are affected by landscape structure, mainly by landscape diversity. In addition, lowland arid agrosystems (characterized by high temperatures and open juniper woodlands with little food availability) constrain the abundance of wild boar populations in spite of their wide plasticity to colonize new habitats.

Key words

landscape fragstats catch-effort density suids 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abaigar T., del Barrio G. and Vericad J. R. 1994. Habitat preference of wild boar (Sus scrofa L., 1758) in a Mediterranean environment. Indirect evaluation by signs. Mammalia 58: 201–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acevedo P., Delibes-Mateos M., Escudero M. A., Vicente J., Marco J. and Gortázar C. 2005. Environmental constraints in the roe deer (Capreolus capreolus Linnaeus, 1758) colonization sequence across the Iberian Mountains (Spain). Journal of Biogeography 32: 1671–1680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baettig M. 1980. Notre sanglier. Bulletin de l’Association pour la Défense Intérest Jurassiens 56: 195–208.Google Scholar
  4. Bielza de Ory V. 1993. Atlas geográfico-temático de Aragón. Diputación General de Aragón, Zaragoza: 1–91.Google Scholar
  5. Boitani L., Mattei L., Nonis D. and Corsi F. 1995a. Spatial and activity patterns of wild boars in Tuscani. Journal of Mammalogy 75: 600–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boitani L., Trapanese P. and Mattei L. 1995b. Methods of population estimates of a hunted wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) population in Tuscany (Italy). Journal of Mountain Ecology 3: 204–208.Google Scholar
  7. Bouldoire J. L. 1984. Le statut du Sanglier en France. Evolution entre 1975 et 1982. [In: F. Spitz and D. Pepin, eds]. Symposium International sur le Sanglier. Colloques de FI.N.R.A., Tolouse 22: 173–186.Google Scholar
  8. Brown J. H. 1984. On the relationships between abundance and distribution species. The American Naturalist 124: 225–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cahill S. and Llimona F. 2004. Demographics of a wild boarSus scrofa Linaeus, 1758 population in a metropolitan park in Barcelona. [In: C. Fonseca, J. Herrero, A. Luís and AMVM Soares eds]. Wild boar Research 2002. A selection and edited papers from the “4th International Wild Boar Symposium”. Galemys, 16 Special Issue: 37–53.Google Scholar
  10. Cahill S., Llimona F. and Gràcia J. 2003. Spacing and nocturnal activity of wild boarSus scrofa in a Mediterranean metropolitan park. Wildlife Biology 9, Suppl. 1: 3–13.Google Scholar
  11. Caley P. 1993. Population dynamics of feral pigs (Sus scrofa) in a tropical riverine habitat complex. Wildlife Research 20: 625–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Calvete C., Estrada R., Angulo E. and Cabezas-Ruiz S. 2004. Habitat factors related to wild rabbit conservation in an agricultural landscape. Landscape Ecology 19: 531–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crawford T. J. 1991. The calculation of index numbers from wildlife monitoring data. [In: Monitoring for conservation and ecology. B. Goldsmith, ed]. Chapman and Hall, London: 225–248.Google Scholar
  14. Dunning J. B., Danielson B. J. and Pulliam H. R. 1992. Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes. Oikos 65: 169–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Escós J. and Alados C. L. 1991. Influence of weather and population characteristics of free-ranging Spanish ibex in Sierra de Cazorla y Segura and in the eastern Sierra Nevada. Mammalia 55: 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fernández-Llario P. and Mateos-Quesada P. 2005. Influence of rainfall on the breeding biology of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in a Mediterranean ecosystem. Folia Zoologica 54: 240–248.Google Scholar
  17. Fernández-Llario P. 2004. Environmental correlates of nest site selection by wild boarSus scrofa. Acta Theriologica 49: 383–392.Google Scholar
  18. Gabor T. M., Van den Bussche R. A. and Silvy N. J. 1999. Demography, sociospatial behaviour, and genetics of feral pigs in a semi-arid environment. Journal of Zoology, London 247: 311–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Geisser H. and Reyer H. U. 2004. Efficacy of hunting, feeding, and fencing to reduce crop damage by wild boars. Journal of Wildlife Management 68: 939–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Geisser H. and Reyer H. U. 2005. The influence of food and temperature on population density of wild boarSus scrofa in the Thurgau (Switzerland). Journal of Zoology, London 267: 89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Genov P. 1982. Significance of natural biocenoses agrocenoses as the resource of food for wild boar (Sus scrofa L.). Ekologia Polska 29: 117–136.Google Scholar
  22. Gipson P., Hlavachick B. and Berger T. 1998. Range expansion by wild hogs across the central United States. Wildlife Society Bulletin 26: 279–286.Google Scholar
  23. Gortázar C., Herrero J., Villafuerte R. and Marco J. 2000. Historical examination of the status of large mammals in Aragon, Spain. Mammalia 64: 411–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hahn N. and Eisfeld D. 1998. Diet and habitat use of wild boar in SW Germany. Gibier Faune Sauvage 15: 595–606.Google Scholar
  25. Hartley S., Kunin W. E., Lennon J. J. and Pocock M. J. O. 2004. Coherence and discontinuity in the scaling of species’ distribution patterns. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 271: 81–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Herrero J. 2002. Adaptación funcional del jabalíSus scrofa L. a un ecosistema forestal y a un ecosistema agrario intensivo en Aragón. MSc thesis, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid: 1–236.Google Scholar
  27. Hortal J., Lobo J. M. and Martin-Piera F. 2001. Forecasting insect species richness scores in poorly surveyed territories: the case of the Portuguese dung beetles (Col. Scarabaeinae). Biodiversity and Conservation 10: 1343–1367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Howells O. and Eduards-Jones G. 1997. A feasibility study of reintroducing wild boarSus scrofa to Scotland: Are existing woodlands large enough to support minimum viable populations? Biological Conservation 81: 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jędrzejewska B., Jędrzejewski W., Bunevich W., Miłkowski L. and Krasiński Z. A. 1997. Factors shaping population densities and increase rates of ungulates in Białowieża Primeval Forest (Poland and Belarus) in the 19th and 20th centuries. Acta Theriologica 42: 339–451.Google Scholar
  30. McGarigal K. and Marks B. J. 1995. FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-351.Google Scholar
  31. Neet C. R. 1995. Population dynamics and management ofSus scrofa in western Switzerland: a statistical modelling approach. Journal of Mountain Ecology 3: 188–191.Google Scholar
  32. Putman R. J. 1996. Ungulates in temperate forest ecosystems: perspectives and recommendations for future research. Forest Ecology and Management 88: 205–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reimoser F. and Reimoser S. 1997. [Game damage and use — about the objective evaluation of the influence of game ungulate on forestry vegetation]. Wildschaden und Wildnutzen — zur objektiven Beurteilung des Einflusses von Schalenwild auf die Waldvegetation. Zeitschrift für Jagdwissenschaft 43: 186–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rosell C. and Herrero J. 2002.Sus scofa. [In: Atlas de los Mamíferos Terrestres de Espańa. L. J. Palomo and J. Gisbert, eds]. SECEM — SECEMU, Madrid: 306–309.Google Scholar
  35. Ruiz-Fons F., Vicente J., Vidal D., Höfle U., Villanúa D., Gauss C, Segalés J., Almería S., Montoro V. and Gortázar C. 2006. Seroprevalence of antibodies against six reproductive pathogens in European wild boar (Sus scrofa) from Spain: the effect of management. Theriogenology 65: 731–743CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Sáez-Royuela C., and Tellería J. L. 1986. The increased population of Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) in Europa. Mammal Review 16: 97–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schley L. and Roper T. J. 2003. Diet of wild boarSus scrofa in Western Europe, with particular reference to consumption of agricultural crops. Mammal Review 33: 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sjarmidi A., Spitz F. and Valet G. 1992. Food resource used by wild boar in Sourthern France. [In: F. Spitz, G. Janeau, G. Gonzalez and S. Aulaguier, eds]. Proceedings of the International Symposium Ongules/Ungulates 91, Tolouse, France: 171–173.Google Scholar
  39. Sodeikat G. and Pohlmeyer K. 2003. Escape movements of family groups of wild boarsSus scrofa influenced by driven hunts in Lower Saxony/Germany. Wildlife Biology 9, Suppl. 1: 43–52.Google Scholar
  40. Taylor R. B., Hellgren E. C., Gabor T. M. and Ilse M. L. 1998. Reproduction of feral pigs in Southern Texas. Journal of Mammalogy 79: 1325–1331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tellería J. L. and Sáez-Royuela C. 1985. L’evolution démographique du sanglier (Sus scrofa) en Espagne. Mammalia 49: 195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Uzal A. and Nores C. 2004. Endogenous and exogenous constraints in the population changes of wild boar (Sus scrofa Linnaeus, 1758). [In: Wild boar research 2002. C. Fonseca, J. Herrero, A. Luis and A. M. V. M. Soares, eds]. A selection and edited papers from the “4th International Wild Boar Symposium”. Galemys, 16 Special Issue: 83–101.Google Scholar
  43. Virgós E. and Casanovas J. G. 1999. Environmental constraints at the edge of a species distribution, the Eurasian badger (Meles meles): a biogeographic approach. Journal of Biogeography 26: 559–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Virgós E. 2002. Factors affecting wild boar (Sus scrofa) occurrence in highly fragmented Mediterranean landscapes. Canadian Journal of Zoology 80: 430–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Welander J. 2000. Spatial and temporal dynamics of wild boar (Sus scrofa) rooting in a mosaic landscape. Journal of Zoology, London 252: 263–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wiens J. A. 1976. Population response to patchy environments. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 7: 81–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wilson K. and Grenfell B. T. 1997. Generalised linear modelling for parasitologists. Parasitology Today 13: 33–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Mammal Research Institute, Bialowieza, Poland 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pelayo Acevedo
    • 1
  • Marco A. Escudero
    • 2
  • Rosa Muńoz
    • 1
  • Christian Gortázar
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto de Investigación en Recursos CinegéticosCiudad RealSpain
  2. 2.Ebronatura S.L. Camino de Cabezón s.n.El Burgo de Ebro ZaragozaSpain

Personalised recommendations