Acta Theriologica

, Volume 51, Issue 1, pp 1–13 | Cite as

Home ranges and densities of medium-sized carnivores in south-east Finland, with special reference to rabies spread

  • Kaarina Kauhala
  • Katja Holmala
  • Wiebke Lammers
  • Julia Schregel


Home ranges and densities of medium-sized carnivores were studied in south-east Finland by radio tracking. The species studied included potential vectors of rabies: the raccoon dogNyctereutes procyonoides (Gray, 1834), red foxVulpes vulpes (Linnaeus, 1758), European badgerMeles meles (Linnaeus, 1758) and domestic catFelis silvestris catus (Schreber, 1777). Home ranges of badgers were largest (mean 14.7 km2) and those of cats smallest (1.5 km2). Home ranges overlapped largely, both within and between species. Most home ranges were larger and population densities lower in south-east Finland compared with those in Western Europe. The pooled density of medium-sized carnivores with overlapping home ranges was, however, high, which may indicate a high risk of a rabies epizootic in this multi-host community. Rabies might also spread rapidly to new areas, because of the large home ranges and, consequently, long dispersal distances.

Key words

Nyctereutes procyonoides Vulpes vulpes Meies meles Felis silvestris catus home range density rabies 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ahnlund H. 1980. Sexual maturity and breeding season of the badger,Meles meles in Sweden. Journal of Zoology, London 190: 77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Artois M. and Andral L. 1980. Short report of materials and methods used in a study of the effect of rabies on the dynamics of fox populations in France, with some preliminary results. [In: Biogeographica 18: The red fox. E. Zimen, ed]. Dr. W. Junk B. V. Publishers, The Hague: 259–262.Google Scholar
  3. Baghli A. and Verhagen R. 2004. Home ranges and movement patterns in a vulnerable polecatMustela putorius population. Acta Theriologica 49: 247–258.Google Scholar
  4. Baker P. J. and Harris S. 2004. Red foxes. The behavioural ecology of red foxes in urban Bristol. [In: Biology and conservation of wild canids. D. W. Macdonald and C. Sillero-Zubiri, eds]. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 207–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biro Z., Szemethy L. and Heltai M. 2004. Home range sizes of wild cats (Felis silvestris) and feral domestic cats (Felis silvestris f. catus) in a hilly region of Hungary. Mammalian Biology 69: 302–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Broseth H., Knutsen B. and Bevanger K. 1997. Spatial organization and habitat utilization of badgersMeles meles: effects of food patch dispersion in the boreal forest of central Norway. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 62: 12–22.Google Scholar
  7. Cavallini P. 1996. Variation in the social system of the red fox. Ethology, Ecology and Evolution 8: 323–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheeseman C. L., Jones G. W., Gallagher J. and Mallinson P. J. 1981. The population structure, density and prevalence of tuberculosis (Myobacterium bovis) in badgers (Meles meles) from four areas in south-west England. Journal of Applied Ecology 18: 795–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Daniels M. J., Beaumont M. A., Johnson P. J., Baiharry D., Macdonald D. W. and Barratt E. 2001. Ecology and genetics of wild-living cats in the north-east of Scotland and the implications for the conservation of the wildcat. Journal of Applied Ecology 38: 146–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. David J. M., Andral L. and Artois M. 1982. Computer simulation model of the epi-enzootic disease of vulpine rabies. Ecological Modelling 15: 107–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Solla S. R., Bonduriansky R. and Brooks R. J. 1999. Eliminating autocorrelation reduces biological relevance of home range estimates. Journal of Animal Ecology 68: 221–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Doncaster C. P. and Macdonald D. W. 1991. Drifting territoriality in the red foxVulpes vulpes. Journal of Animal Ecology 60: 423–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Drygala F., Mix H. M., Stier N. and Roth M. 2000. Preliminary findings from ecological studies of the raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides) in eastern Germany. Zeitschrift für Ökologie und Naturschutz 9: 147–152.Google Scholar
  14. Drygala F., Stier N. and Roth M. 2002. Erste Ergebnisse zur Nahrungsökologie, Home-Range und Habitatnutzung des Marderhundes (Nyctereutes procyonoides) — eines invasiven Caniden in Ostdeutschland. Artenschutzreport, Heft 12: 48–54.Google Scholar
  15. Englund J. 1980a. Yearly variations of recovery and dispersal rates of fox cubs tagged in Swedish coniferous forests. [In: Biogeographica 18: The red fox. E. Zimen, ed]. Dr. W. Junk B. V. Publishers, The Hague: 195–207.Google Scholar
  16. Englund J. 1980b. Population dynamics of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) in Sweden. [In: Biogeographica 18: The red fox. E. Zimen, ed]. Dr. W. Junk B. V. Publishers, The Hague: 107–121.Google Scholar
  17. Feore S. and Montgomery W. I. 1999. Habitat effects on the spatial ecology of the European badger (Meles meles). Journal of Zoology, London 247: 537–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Formosov A. N. 1932. [A formula for calculating the abundance of mammals by means of snow track counts]. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 11: 66–69. [In Russian]Google Scholar
  19. Frafjord K. 2004. Winter range of a red fox (Vulpes vulpes) in a northern birch forest. Mammalian Biology 69: 342–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Genovesi J. L., Besa M. and Toso S. 1995. Ecology of a feral catFelis catus population in an agricultural area of northern Italy. Wildlife Biology 1: 233–237.Google Scholar
  21. Gittleman J. L. and Harvey P. H. 1982. Carnivore home-range size, metabolic needs and ecology. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 10: 57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goretzki J., Ahrens M., Stubbe C, Tottewitz T., Gleich E. and Sparing H. 1997. Zur ökologie des Rotfuchses auf der Insel Rügen: Ergebnisse der Jungfuchsmarkierung. Beiträge zur Jagd- und Wilddforschung 22: 187–199.Google Scholar
  23. Goszczynski J. 1989. Spatial distribution of red foxesVulpes vulpes in winter. Acta Theriologica 34: 361–372.Google Scholar
  24. Goszczyński J. 1999. Fox, raccoon dog and badger densities in North Eastern Poland. Acta Theriologica 44: 413–420.Google Scholar
  25. Goszczyński J. and Skoczyńska J. 1996. Density estimation, family group size and recruitment in a badger population near Rogow (Central Poland). Miscelanea Zoologica 19(2): 27–33.Google Scholar
  26. Harestad A. S. and Bunnell F. L. 1979. Home range and body weight — a reevaluation. Ecology 60: 389–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harris S. 1980. Home ranges and patterns of distribution of foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in an urban area, as revealed by radio tracking, [in: A handbook of biotelemetry and radio tracking, C. J. Amlaner and D. W. Macdonald, eds]. Pergamon Press, Oxford: 685–690.Google Scholar
  28. Harris S. 1981. An estimation of the number of foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in the city of Bristol, and some possible factors affecting their distribution. Journal of Applied Ecology 18: 455–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harris S. and Trewhella W. J. 1988. An analysis of some of the factors affecting dispersal in an urban fox (Vulpes vulpes) population. Journal of Applied Ecology 25: 409–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Helle E. and Kauhala K. 1993. Age structure, mortality, and sex ratio of the raccoon dog in Finland. Journal of Mammalogy 74: 936–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Helle E. and Kauhala K. 1995. Reproduction in the raccoon dog in Finland. Journal of Mammalogy 76: 1036–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hofer H. 1988. Variation in resource presence, utilization and reproductive success within a population of European badgers (Meles meles). Mammal Review 18: 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hoffmann T. 1999. Untersuchungen zur Ökologie des europäischen Dachses (Meles meles L. 1758) im Hakelwald (nordöstliches Harzvorland). PhD thesis, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany: 1–102.Google Scholar
  34. Ivanter E. V. 1973. [Notes on an investigation of the badger near the northern limit of its range.] Truddy Gosudarstvennogo Zapovednika Kivach 2: 164–173. [In Russian]Google Scholar
  35. Johnson D. D. P., Jetz W. and Macdonald D. W. 2002. Environmental correlates of badger social spacing across Europe. Journal of Biogeography 29: 411–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kauhala K. 1996. Reproductive strategies of the raccoon dog and the red fox in Finland. Acta Theriologica 41: 51–58.Google Scholar
  37. Kauhala K. 2002. European badger — a social Mustelid? Suomen Riista 48: 7–17. [In Finnish with English summary]Google Scholar
  38. Kauhala K. 2003. Rabies and the spatial ecology of red fox in Europe: a comparison with preliminary results of the Finnish carnivore community. Suomen Riista 49: 70–84. [In Finnish with English summary]Google Scholar
  39. Kauhala K. and Helle E. 1990. Age determination of the raccoon dog in Finland. Acta Theriologica 35: 321–329.Google Scholar
  40. Kauhala K. and Helle E. 1994. Home ranges and monogamy of the raccoon dog in southern Finland. Suomen Riista 40: 32–41. [In Finnish with English summary]Google Scholar
  41. Kauhala K. and Saeki M. 2004. Raccoon dogs. Finnish and Japanese raccoon dogs — on the road to speciation? [In: Biology and conservation of wild canids. D. W. Macdonald and C. Sillero-Zubiri, eds]. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 217–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kauhala K, Helle E. and Taskinen K. 1993. Home range of the raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides) in southern Finland. Journal of Zoology, London 231: 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kauhala K, Laukkanen P. and von Rége I, 1998. Summer food composition and food niche overlap of the raccoon dog, red fox and badger in Finland. Ecography 21: 457–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kenward R. E., South A. B. and Walls S. S. 2003. Ranges6 v1.2: For the analysis of tracking and location data. Anatrack Ltd., Wareham, UK.Google Scholar
  45. Kolb H. H. 1986. Some observations of the home range of vixens (Vulpes vulpes) in the suburbs of Edinburgh. Journal of Zoology, London 210: 636–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Korhonen H. 1987. Energy metabolism of raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides, Gray 1834): applied perspective to common farming practices. Publications of the University of Kuopio, Natural Sciences, Original reports 1: 1–69.Google Scholar
  47. Kowalczyk R., Bunevich A. N. and Jędrzejewska B. 2000. Badger density and distribution of setts in Bialowieza Primeval Forest (Poland and Belarus) compared to other European populations. Acta Theriologica 45: 395–408.Google Scholar
  48. Kowalczyk R., Zalewski A., Jedrzejewska B. and Jędrzejewski W. 2003. Spatial organization and demography of badgers (Meles meles) in Bialowieźa Primeval Forest, Poland, and the influence of earthworms on badger densities in Europe. Canadian Journal of Zoology 81: 74–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kowalczyk R., Zalewski A. and Jedrzejewska B. 2004. Seasonal and spatial pattern of shelter use by badgersMeles meles in Białowieza Primeval Forest (Poland). Acta Theriologica 49: 75–92.Google Scholar
  50. Kruuk H. 1989. The social badger — ecology and behaviour of a group-living carnivore (Meles meles). Oxford University Press, Oxford: 1–155.Google Scholar
  51. Kruuk H. and Parish T. 1982. Factors affecting population density, group size and territory size of the European badger,Meles meles. Journal of Zoology, London 196: 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Liberg O. 1980. Spacing patterns in a population of rural free roaming domestic cats. Oikos 35: 336–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Liberg O. 1984. Home range and territoriality in free ranging house cats. Acta Zoologica Fennica 171: 283–285.Google Scholar
  54. Liberg O. and Sandell M. 1988. Spatial organization and reproductive tactic in the domestic and other felids. [In: The domestic cat: the biology of its behaviour. D. C. Turner and P. Bateson, eds]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 83–98.Google Scholar
  55. Lindström E. 1982. Population ecology of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes L.) in relation to food supply. PhD thesis, University of Stockholm, Stockholm: 1–24.Google Scholar
  56. Lindström L. 1989. Food limitation and social regulation in a red fox population. Holarctic Ecology 12: 70–79.Google Scholar
  57. Lloyd H. G. 1980. The red fox. E. T. Batsford Ltd, London: 1–288.Google Scholar
  58. Lovari S., Valier P. and Ricci Lucchi M. 1994. Ranging behaviour and activity of red foxes in relation to environmental variables, in a Mediterranean mixed pinewood. Journal of Zoology, London 232: 323–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Macdonald D. W. 1981. Resource dispersion and the social organization of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes). [In: Proceedings of the Worldwide Furbearer Conference. J. A. Chapman and D. Pursley, eds]. University of Maryland Press, Maryland: 918–949.Google Scholar
  60. Macdonald D. W. and Bacon P. J. 1982. Fox society, contact rate and rabies epizootiology. Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Disease 5: 247–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Macdonald D. W., Mitchelmore F. and Bacon P. J. 1996. Predicting badger sett numbers: evaluating methods in East Sussex. Journal of Biogeography 23: 649–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Macdonald D. W. and Silllero-Zubiri C. 2004. Dramatis personae. Wild canids — an introduction and dramatis personae. [In: The biology and conservation of wild canids. D. W. Macdonald and C. Sillero-Zubiri, eds]. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Malyshev V. 1936. [Snow-track counts of mammals]. Vestnik Dalnevostochnogo filiala Akademii nauk SSSR. N. 16. [In Russian]Google Scholar
  64. Matérn B. 1960. Spatial variation. Meddelanden från Statens Skogsforskningsinstitut 49(5).Google Scholar
  65. Matyastik T. and Bicik V. 1999. Distribution and habitat selection of badger (Meles meles) in northern Moravia. Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis, Facultas Rerum Naturalium, Biologlica 37: 77–88.Google Scholar
  66. Maurel D. 1980. Home range and activity rhythm of adult male foxes during the breeding season. [In: A hańdbook of biotelemetry and radiotracking. C. J. Amlaner and D. W. Macdonald, eds]. Pergamon Press, Oxford: 697–701.Google Scholar
  67. Mohr C. O. 1947. Table of equivalent populations of North American small mammals. The American Midland Naturalist 37: 223–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Mulder J. L. 1985. Spatial organization, movements and dispersal in a dutch red fox (Vulpes vulpes) population: some preliminary results. Revue d’Ecologie (La Terre et la Vie) 40: 133–138.Google Scholar
  69. Möckel R. 2000. Der Marderhund in der Niederlausitz. Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege in Brandenburg 9: 19–22.Google Scholar
  70. Niewold F. J. J. 1980. Aspects of the social structure of red fox populations: a summary. [In: Biogeographica 18: The red fox. E. Zimen, ed]. Dr. W. Junk B. V. Publishers, The Hague: 185–194.Google Scholar
  71. Nordström S. and Rundgren S. 1973. Associations of lumbricids in southern Sweden. Pedobiologia 13: 301–326.Google Scholar
  72. Nowak E. 1993.Nyctereutes procyonoides Gray, 1834 — Marderhund. — [In: Handbuch der Säugetiere Europas, Band 5: Raubsäuger. Stubbe M. and F. Krapp, eds]. Aula Verlag, Wiesbaden: 215–248.Google Scholar
  73. Odum E. P. and Kuenzler E. J. 1955. Measurement of territory home range size in birds. The Auk 72: 128–137.Google Scholar
  74. Overskaug K, Knutsen B. and Broseth H. 1995. Habitat and area use by red foxVulpes vulpes vixens in mid-Norway. Fauna Norvegica Serie A 16: 29–33.Google Scholar
  75. Page R. J. C. 1981. Dispersal and population density of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) in an area of London. Journal of Zoology, London 194: 485–491.Google Scholar
  76. Page R. J. C., Ross J. and Bennett D. H. 1992. A study of the home ranges, movements and behaviour of the feral cat population at Avonmouth Docks. Wildlife Research 19: 263–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Panek M. and Bresiński W. 2002. Red foxVulpes vulpes density and habitat use in a rural area of western Poland in the end of 1990s, compared with the turn of 1970s. Acta Theriologica 47: 433–442.Google Scholar
  78. Pelikan J. and Vackar J. 1978. Densities and fluctuation in numbers of red fox, badger and pine marten in the ‘Bucin’ forest. Folia Zoologica 27: 289–303.Google Scholar
  79. Pigozzi G. 1987. Behavioural ecology of the European badger (Mele meles L.): diet, food availability and use of space in the Maremma Natural Park, Central Italy. PhD thesis, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen.Google Scholar
  80. Rau J. R. 1987. Ecologia del zorro,Vulpes vulpes (L.), en la Reserva Biologica se Donana, S. O. De Espana. PhD thesis, Facultad de Ciencias Biologicas, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla: 1–265.Google Scholar
  81. Revilla E. and Palomares F. 2002. Spatial organization, group living and ecological correlates in low-density populations of Eurasian badgers,Meles meles. Journal of Animal Ecology 71: 497–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Rodrigues A., Martin R. and Delibes M. 1996. Space use and activity in a Mediterranean population of badgersMeles meles. Acta Theriologica 41: 59–72.Google Scholar
  83. Rogers L. M., Cheeseman C. L. and Mallison P. J. 1997. The demography of a high-density badger (Meles meles) population in the west of England. Journal of Zoology, London 242: 705–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Rooney S. M., Wolfe A. and Hayden T. J. 1998. Autocorrelated data in telemetry studies: time to independence and the problem to behavioural effects. Mammal Review 28: 89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Schwarz S., Sutor A. and Litzbarski H. 2002. Nachweise des Marderhundes (Nyctereutes procyonoides) im Europäischen Vogelschutzgebiet (SPA) Havelländisches Luch. Naturschutz und Landschhaftspflege in Brandenburg 11: 198–199.Google Scholar
  86. Smith G. J., Cary J. R. and Rongstad O. J. 1981. Sampling strategies for radio-tracking coyotes. Wildlife Society Bulletin 9: 88–93.Google Scholar
  87. Stiebling U. and Schneider R. 1999. Zur Habitatnutzung des RotfuchesesVulpes vulpes (L., 1758) in der uckermärkischen Agrarlandschaft: Ergebnisse zur Populationsdichte und -dynamik. Beiträge zur Jagd- und Wild-forschung 24: 331–341.Google Scholar
  88. Storm G. L. 1965. Movements and activities of foxes as determined by radio-tracking. The Journal of Wildlife Management 29: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Stubbe M. 1965. Zur Biologie der Raubtiere eines abgeschlossenen Waldgebietes. Zeitschrift für Jagdwissenschaft 11: 73–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Thyul’ko Z. S. and Kuzmin I. V. 2002. Simulation of rabies epizootic process in fox populations at a limited carrying capacity of biotopes. Russian Journal of Ecology 33: 331–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Travaini A., Aldama J. J., Laffitte R. and Delibes M. 1993. Home range and activity patterns of red foxVulpes vulpes breeding females. Acta Theriologica 38: 427–434.Google Scholar
  92. Trewhella W. J., Harris S. and McAllister F. E. 1988. Dispersal distance, home-range size and population density in the red fox (Vulpes vulpes): a quantitative analysis. Journal of Applied Ecology 25: 423–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Turner D. C. and Mertens C. 1986. Home range size, overlap and exploitation in domestic farm cats (Felis catus). Behaviour 99: 22–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Vedernikov V. A., Sedov V. A., Baldina I. V., Gulyukin A. M. and Troizkaya E. G. 1999. Summary of rabies in the Russian Federation — particularities of the present situation. Rabies Bulletin Europe 23(4). Scholar
  95. Voigt D. R. and Macdonald D. W. 1984. Variation in the spatial and social behaviour of the red fox,Vulpes vulpes. Acta Zoologica Fennica 171: 261–265.Google Scholar
  96. Westerling B. 1991. Rabies in Finland and its control 1988–90. Suomen Riista 37: 93–100. [In Finnish with English summary]Google Scholar
  97. WHO 2003. Country summaries of rabies cases. Rabies Bulletin Europe 27. http://www.who- Scholar
  98. WHO 2004. Country summaries of rabies cases. Rabies Bulletin Europe 28. http://www.who- Scholar
  99. Woodroffe R. and Macdonald D. W. 1992. Badger clans: demographic groups in an antisocial species. Journal of Zoology, London 227: 696–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Woodroffe R., Cleaveland S., Courtenay O., Laurenson M. K. and Artois M. 2004. Infectious disease: Infectious disease in the management and conservation of wild canids. [In: Biology and conservation of wild canids. D. W. Macdonald and C. Sillero-Zubiri, eds]. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 123–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Worton B. J. 1989. Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies. Ecology 70: 164–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Zimen E. 1984. Long range movements of the red fox,Vulpes vulpes L. Acta Zoologica Fennica 171: 267–270.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Mammal Research Institute, Bialowieza, Poland 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kaarina Kauhala
    • 1
  • Katja Holmala
    • 2
  • Wiebke Lammers
    • 3
  • Julia Schregel
    • 4
  1. 1.Finnish Game and Fisheries Research InstituteTurku Game and Fisheries ResearchTurkuFinland
  2. 2.VantaaFinland
  3. 3.LeipzigGermany
  4. 4.OuluFinland

Personalised recommendations