Advertisement

Acta Theriologica

, Volume 47, Issue 2, pp 163–173 | Cite as

Levels of social tolerance between snow volesChionomys nivalis during over-wintering periods

  • Juan J. Luque-Larena
  • Pilar LópezEmail author
  • Joaquim Gosálbez
Article

Abstract

We examined winter social behaviour of the snow voleChionomys nivalis Martins, 1842, a rock-dwelling microtine found principally in high-mountain biotopes. We conducted dyadic encounters among wild-caughtC. nivalis to determine patterns of intraspecific tolerance and the degree of aggressiveness between and within sexes during wintering periods. Our data show a high frequency of agonistic behaviours in all social encounters. Male pairs spent less time being aggressive than female pairs but more time in investigative behaviours. In contrast, the intensity of aggression displayed during interactions was significantly higher in male-male encounters than in female-female encounters, with an intermediate level of aggression in male-female encounters. The low degree of social tolerance found seems to be in agreement with the available data on the social organization of this species and further suggests that individuals may not spatially associate during over-wintering periods. Although both males and females were socially intolerant, the different patterns observed between the sexes may underlie different strategies.

Key words

Chionomys nivalis social tolerance over-wintering periods 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amori G. 1999. Chionomys nivalis (Martins, 1842). [In: Atlas of European mammals. A. J. Mitchell-Jones, G. Amori, W. Bogdanowicz, B. Kryštufek, P. J. H. Reijnders, F. Spitzenberger, M. Stubbe, J. B. M. Thissen, V. Vohralík and J. Zima, eds]. Academic Press, London: 256–257.Google Scholar
  2. Beck L. R. and Anthony R. G. 1971. Metabolic and behavioral thermoregulation in the long-tailed vole,Microtus longicaudus. Journal of Mammalogy 52: 404–412.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Berteaux D., Bergeron J. M., Thomas D. W. and Lapierre H. 1996. Solitude versus gregariousness: do physical benefits drive the choice in overwintering meadow voles? Oikos 76: 330–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bieńkowski P. and Marszałek U. 1974. Metabolism and energy budget in the snow vole. Acta Theriologica 4: 55–67.Google Scholar
  5. Clarke J. R. 1956. The aggressive behaviour of the vole. Behaviour 9: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Colvin D. V. 1973. Agonistic behaviour in males of five species of volesMicrotus. Animal Behaviour 21: 471–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cranford J. A. and Derting T. L. 1983. Intra and interspecific behavior ofMicrotus pennsylvanicus andMicrotus pinetorum. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 13: 7–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crowcroft P. and Rowe F. P. 1963. Social organization and territorial behaviour in the wild house mouse (Mus musculus). Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 140: 517–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Jonge G. 1980. Response to con- and hetero-specific male odours by the volesMicrotus agrestis, M. arvalis andClethrionomys glareolus with respect to competition for space. Behaviour 73: 277–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Erlinge S. 1975. Feeding habits of the weaselMustela nivalis in relation to prey abundance. Oikos 26: 378–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferkin M. H. 1988. The effect of familiarity on social interactions in meadow voles,Microtus pennsylvanicus: a laboratory and field study. Animal Behaviour 36: 1816–1822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferkin M. H. and Seamon J. O. 1987. Odor preference and social behavior in meadow voles,Microtus pennsylvanicus: seasonal differences. Canadian Journal of Zoology 65: 2931–2937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gębczyński M. 1969. Social regulation of body temperature in the bank vole. Acta Theriologica 29: 427–440.Google Scholar
  14. Gipps J. H. W. 1981. Behavior of bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus) in the field. Journal of Mammalogy 62: 382–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gipps J. H. W. 1984. The behaviour of mature and immature male bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus). Animal Behaviour 32: 836–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gosálbez J. 1987. [Microtus nivalis (Martins, 1842). Snow vole]. [In: Insectivores and rodents of Catalonia. J. Gosálbez, ed]. Ketres S. A., Barcelona: 203–205. [In Catalan]Google Scholar
  17. Gosling L. M., Atkinson N. W., Collins S. A., Roberts R. J. and Walters R. L. 1996. Avoidance of scent-marked areas depends on the intruder’s body size. Behaviour 133: 491–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hayes J. P., Seakman J. R. and Racey P. A. 1992. The contributions of local heating and reducing exposed surface area to the energetic benefits of huddling by short-tailed field voles (Microtus agrestis). Physiological Zoology 65: 742–762.Google Scholar
  19. Hurst J. L., Hall S., Roberts R. and Christian C. 1996. Social organization in the aboriginal house mouse,Mus spretus Lataste: behavioural mechanisms underlying the spatial dispersion of competitors. Animal Behaviour 51: 327–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Janeau G. 1980. Répartition écologique des micromammifčres dans l’étage alpin de la région de Brianęon. Mammalia 44: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Karlsson A. F. 1986. Social structure in a population of the bank vole,Clethrionomys glareolus. PhD Thesis, Uppsala University, Sweden: 1–146.Google Scholar
  22. Karlsson A. F. 1988. Interindividual proximity and the probability of winter survival in the bank vole,Clethrionomys glareolus. Canadian Journal of Zoology 66: 1841–1845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. King K. 1989. The natural history of weasels and stoats. Christopher Helm, London: 1–253.Google Scholar
  24. Krapp F. 1982.Microtus nivalis (Martins, 1842) — Schneemaus. [In: Handbuch der Säugetiere Europas. Band 2/1: Nagetiere II. J. Niethammer and F. Krapp, eds]. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Wiesbaden: 261–283.Google Scholar
  25. Krebs C. J. 1979. Dispersal, spacing behaviour, and genetics in relation to population fluctuations in the voleMicrotus townsendii. Fortschritte der Zoologie 25: 61–77.Google Scholar
  26. Kryštufek B. and Kovacič D. 1989. Vertical distribution of the snow voleMicrotus nivalis (Martins, 1842) in northwestern Yugoslavia. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 54: 153–156.Google Scholar
  27. Le Louarn H. and Janeau G. 1975. Répartition et biologie du campagnol des neiges Microtus nivalis Martins dans la région de Brianęon. Mammalia 39: 589–604.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Luque-Larena J. J., López P. and Gosálbez J. 2001. Scent matching modulates space use and agonistic behaviour between male snow volesChionomys nivalis. Animal Behaviour 62: 1089–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Madison D. M. 1984. Group nesting and its ecological and evolutionary significance in overwintering microtine rodents. [In: Winter ecology of small mammals. J. F. Merritt, ed]. Special Publication of Carnegie Museum of Natural History, No. 10, Pittsburgh: 285–291.Google Scholar
  30. Madison D. M. and McShea W. J. 1987. Seasonal changes in reproductive tolerance, spacing, and social organization in meadow voles: a microtine model. American Zoologist 27: 899–908.Google Scholar
  31. Madison D. M., FitzGerald R. W. and McShea W. J. 1984. Dynamics of social nesting in over-wintering meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus): Possible consequences for population cycling. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 15: 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Martín J. and Salvador A. 1992. Tail loss consequences on habitat use by the Iberian rock-lizard,Lacerta monticola. Oikos 65: 318–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Maynard-Smith J. and Parker G. A. 1976. The logic of asymmetric contests. Animal Behaviour 24: 159–175.Google Scholar
  34. McShea W. J. 1990. Social tolerance and proximate mechanisms of dispersal among winter groups of meadow voles,Microtus pennsylvanicus. Animal Behaviour 39: 346–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ostfeld R. S. 1985a. Experimental analysis of aggression and spacing behavior in California voles. Canadian Journal of Zoology 63: 2277–2282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ostfeld R. S. 1985b. Limiting resources and territoriality in microtine rodents. The American Naturalist 126: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ostfeld R. S. 1990. The ecology of territoriality in small mammals. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 5: 411–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pruitt W. O. Jr 1984. Snow and small mammals. [In: Winter ecology of small mammals. J. F. Merritt, ed]. Special Publication of Carnegie Museum of Natural History, No. 10, Pittsburgh: 1–8.Google Scholar
  39. Siegel S. and Castellan N. J. 1988. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. Second edition. McGraw-Hill, New York: 1–312.Google Scholar
  40. Sokal R. R. and Rohlf F. J. 1995. Biometry. Third edition. W. H. Freeman, New York: 1–887.Google Scholar
  41. Tamarin R. H., Ostfeld R. S., Pugh S. R. and Bujalska G. (eds) 1990. Social systems and population cycles in voles. Birkhäuser Verlag, Switzerland: 1–229.Google Scholar
  42. Vickery W. L. and Millar J. S. 1984. The energetics of huddling by endotherms. Oikos 43: 88–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Webster A. and Brooks R. J. 1981. Social behavior ofMicrotus pennsylvanicus in relation to seasonal changes in demography. Journal of Mammalogy 62: 738–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. West S. D. and Dublin H. T. 1984. Behavioral strategies of small mammals under winter conditions: solitary or social? [In: Winter ecology of small mammals. J. F. Merritt, ed]. Special Publication of Carnegie Museum of Natural History, No. 10, Pittsburgh: 293–299.Google Scholar
  45. Wiegert R. G. 1961. Respiratory energy loss and activity patterns in the meadow vole,Microtus pennsylvanicus. Ecology 42: 245–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wolff J. O. and Lidicker W. Z. Jr 1981. Communal winter nesting and food sharing in taiga voles. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 9: 237–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wolff J. O. 1984. Overwintering behavioural strategies in taiga voles (Microtus xanthognathus). [In: Winter ecology of small mammals. J. F. Merritt, ed]. Special Publication of Carnegie Museum of Natural History, No. 10, Pittsburgh: 315–318.Google Scholar
  48. Wolff J. O. 1985. Behavior. [In: Biology of New WorldMicrotus. R. H. Tamarin, ed]. Special Publication, American Society of Mammalogists, no. 8: 340–372.Google Scholar
  49. Ylönen H. and Viitala J. 1985. Social organization of an enclosed winter population of the bank voleClethrionomys glareolus. Annales Zoologici Fennici 22: 353–358.Google Scholar
  50. Ylönen H., Jędrzejewska B., Jędrzejewski W. and Heikkilä J. 1992. Antipredatory behaviour ofClethrionomys voles — ‘David and Goliath’ arms race. Annales Zoologici Fennici 4: 207–216.Google Scholar
  51. Yoccoz N. G. and Ims R. A. 1999. Demography of small mammals in cold regions: the importance of environmental variability. Ecological Bulletins 47: 137–144.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Mammal Research Institute, Bialowieza, Poland 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juan J. Luque-Larena
    • 1
  • Pilar López
    • 2
    Email author
  • Joaquim Gosálbez
    • 1
  1. 1.Departament de Biologia AnimalUniversitat de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Departamento de Ecología EvolutivaMuseo Nacional de Ciencias NaturalesMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations