Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 3–8 | Cite as

Letter from the guest editors

Agents organizations: A concise overview
  • Jaime Simão Sichman
  • Virginia Dignum
  • Cristiano Castelfranchi
Open Access
Article
  • 125 Downloads

References

  1. 1._G. Abdelkader. Requirements for achieving software agents autonomy and defining their responsibility. InProceedings of the AAMAS-03 Work7 shop on Autonomy, Delegation, and Control: From Inter-agent to Organizations and Institutions. Melbourne, Australia, 2003.Google Scholar
  2. 2._O. Boissier and Y. Demazeau. ASIC: an architecture for social and individual control and its application to computer vision.. In J. Perram, and J. P. Müller, editors,Applications of Multi-Agent Systems — Proceedings of MAAMAW 1994, LNAI series, vol. 1069, pg. 135–149. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1996.Google Scholar
  3. 3._C. Castelfranchi, M. Micelli and A. Cesta. Dependence relations among autonomous agents. In E. Werner and Y. Demazeau, editors,Decentralized AI 3, pg. 215–227. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 1992.Google Scholar
  4. 4._R. Conte and M. Paolucci.Reputation in artificial societies: social beliefs for social order. Kluwer Academic Publisherrs, Amsterdam, 2002.Google Scholar
  5. 5._R. Conte, C. Castelfranchi and F. Dignum. Autonomous Norm Acceptance. In J. P.Mueller, M. P. Singh, and A. S. Rao, editors,Intelligent Agents V, LNAI series, vol. 1555, pg. 45–60. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1999.Google Scholar
  6. 6._V. Dignum.A model for organizational interaction: based on agents, founded in logic. SIKS Dissertation Series 2004-1. 270 pages. SIKS, Amsterdam, 2004. PhD Thesis.Google Scholar
  7. 7._V. Dignum and F. Dignum. Modeling agent societies: coordination frameworks and institutions. In P. Brazdil and A. Jorge, editors,Progress in Artificial Intelligence — Proceedings of APIA 2001, LNAI series, vol. 2258, pg. 191–204. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2001.Google Scholar
  8. 8._M. Esteva, J. Padget, and C. Sierra. Formalizing a language for institutions and norms. In J.-J.CH. Meyer and M. Tambe, editors,Intelligent Agents VIII, LNAI series, vol. 2333, pg. 348–366. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9._J. Ferber and O. Gutknecht. A meta-model for the analysis and design of organizations in multiagents systems. In Yves Demazeau, editor,Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS 1998), pg. 128–135. IEEE Press, Washington, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10._M. Fox, M. Barbuceanu, M. Gruninger, and J. Lon. An organizational ontology for enterprise modeling. In M. Prietula, K. Carley, and L. Gasser, editors,Simulating Organizations: Computational Models of Institutions and Groups, chapter 7, pg. 131–152. AAAI Press / MIT Press, Menlo Park, 1998.Google Scholar
  11. 11._M. Hannoun, O. Boissier, J. S. Sichman, and C. Sayettat. MOISE: An organizational model for multiagent systems. In M. C. Monard and J. Sichman, editors,Advances in Artificial Intelligence — Proceedings of IBERAMIA/SBIA 2000, LNAI series, vol. 1952, pg. 152–161. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2000.Google Scholar
  12. 12._J. F. Hübner, J. S. Sichman and O. Boissier. Using the MOISE+ for a cooperative framework of MAS reorganization. In A. Bazzan and S. Labidi, editors,Advances in Artificial Intelligence — Proceedings of SBIA 2004, LNAI series, vol. 3171, pg. 506–515. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13._J. F. Hübner, J. S. Sichman and O. Boissier. A model for the structural, functional and deontic specification of a MAS organization. In G. Bittencourt and G. Ramalho, editors,Advances in Artificial Intelligence — Proceedings of SBIA 2002, LNAI series, vol. 2507, pg. 118–128. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2002.Google Scholar
  14. 14._C. Lemaître and C. Excelente. Multi-agent organization approach. In F. Garijo and C. Lemaître, editors,Proceedings of the II Ibero-american Workshop on DAI and MAS, pg. 7–16. Toledo, Spain, 1998.Google Scholar
  15. 15._V. Parunak and J. Odell. Representing social structures in UML. In M. Wooldridge, G. Weiss, and P. Ciancarini, editors,Agent-Oriented Software Engineering II, LNCS series, vol. 2222, pg. 1–16. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16._M. Prasad, K. Decker, A. Garvey, and V. Lesser. Exploring organizational design with TÆMS: a case study of distributed data processing. In ToruIshida, editor,Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS 1996), pages 283–290. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, 1996.Google Scholar
  17. 17._J. Sabater and C. Sierra. Reputation and social network analysis in multi-agent systems. In C.Castelfranchi and W. L. Johnson, editors,Proceedings of the 1 st. International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2002), pg. 475–482. ACM Press, New York, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18._J. S. Sichman.Raciocínio social e organizacional em sistemas multiagentes: avanços e perspectivas. 235 pages. Escola Politécnica da USP, São Paulo, 2003. Associate Professorship Thesis (In Portuguese).Google Scholar
  19. 19._J. S. Sichman, R. Conte, Y. Demazeau and C. Castelfranchi. A social reasoning mechanism based on dependence networks. In Tony Cohn, editor,Proceedings of the 11 th. European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 1994), pg. 188–192. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., New York, 1994.Google Scholar
  20. 20. Y. So and E. Durfee. An organizational self-design model for organizational change. InProceedings of the AAAI-93 Workshop on AI and Theories of Groups and Organizations: Conceptual and Empirical Research, pg. 8–15. Washington, USA, 1993.Google Scholar
  21. 21._M. Tambe and W. Zhang, W. Towards flexible teamwork in persistent teams. In Yves Demazeau, editor,Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS 1998), pg. 277–284. IEEE Press, Washington, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22. G. Weiß.Some studies in distributed machine learning and organizational design. Technical Report FKI-189-94, Institut für Informatik, Technische Universität München, 1994.Google Scholar
  23. 23._M. Wooldridge, N.R. Jennings and D. Kinny. The GAIA methodology for agent oriented analysis and design.Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 3(3):285–312, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24._F. Zambonelli. Abstractions and infrastructures for the design and development of mobile agent organizations. In M. Wooldridge, G. Weiss, and P. Ciancarini, editors,Agent-Oriented Software Engineering II, LNCS series, vol. 2222, pg. 245–262. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25._F. Zambonelli, N. Jennings, and M. Wooldridge. Organizational abstractions for the analysis and design of multi- agent systems. In P. Ciancarini and M. Wooldridge, editors,Agent-Oriented Software Engineering, LNCS series, vol. 1957, pg. 98–114. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Computer Society 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jaime Simão Sichman
    • 1
  • Virginia Dignum
    • 2
  • Cristiano Castelfranchi
    • 3
  1. 1.Computer Engineering Department (PCS)University of São Paulo (USP)Brazil
  2. 2.Institute for Computing and Information Sciences (ICS)University UtrechtThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies (ISTC)National Research Council (CNR)Italy

Personalised recommendations