Assessment of oral bioavailability and preclinical pharmacokinetics of DRF-6196, a novel oxazolidinone analogue, in comparison to linezolid®
Summary
The aim of this study was to determine the bioavailability of a novel oxazolidinone, DRF-6196, in mice and rats followingintravenous (i.v) and oral dosing and to compare the pharmacokinetics with those obtained following linezolid dosing. Blood samples were drawn at predetermined intervals up to 24 h post-dose after either DRF-6196 or linezolid administration. The concentrations of DRF-6196 and linezolid in various plasma samples were determined by a HPLC method. Following oral administration maximum concentrations of DRF-6196 were achieved within 0.5 h irrespective of the species. While the doses increased in the ratio of 1∶ 3 ∶10, mean Cmax and AUC(0−∞) values in mice for DRF-6196 increased in the ratio of 1∶ 3.87∶8.53 and 1 ∶ 2.51 ∶ 9.24, respectively. Both the Cmax and AUC0−∞ values increased almost proportional to the dose administered in mice. Following i.v administration, the concentration of DRF-6196 declined in a bi-exponential fashion with terminal elimination half-life of 1.5 h irrespective of the species. The systemic clearance and volume of distribution of DRF-6196 in mice were 1.14 L/h/kg and 0.66 L/kg, respectively afteri.v} administration, while the respective values in rats were 0.61 L/h/kg and 0.41L/kg, respectively. Elimination half-life ranged between 0.8–1.5 h. Absolute oral bioavailability of DRF-6196 was found to be 80–96% across the test dose range. Although plasma levels of DRF-6196 were lesser compared to linezolid in the initial hours, it may not have any consequences on the clinical effectiveness of the molecule.
Keywords
DRF-6196 linezolid oxazolidinone mice rats pharmacokinetics bioavailabilityPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Norrby R. (2001): Linezolid — a review of the first oxazolidinone. Expert Opin. Pharmacother., 2, 293–302.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 2.Andes D, van Ogtrop M.L, Peng J, Craig W.A. (2002). In vivo pharmacodynamics of a new oxazolidinone (linezolid). Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 46, 3484–3489.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.Bozdogan B, Appelbaum P.C. (2004). Oxazolidinones: activity, mode of action, and mechanism of resistance. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents, 23, 113–119.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Ford C.W, Zurenko G.E, Barbachyn M.R. (2001). The discovery of linezolid, the first oxazolidinone antibacterial agent. Curr. Drug Targets Infect Disord., 1,181–199.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Perry CM, Jarvis B. (2001). Linezolid:: a review of its use in the management of serious gram-positive infections. Drugs, 61, 525–551.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Sitaramkumar M, Mamidi, N.V.S.R, Subra^nanyam D, Sastry, T.V.R, Prasad C.N, Sarnaik H.M, Ravikanth B, Iqbal J, Rajagoaplan R. (2001). Antibacterial potential of new azolo benzoxazepinyl oxazolidinones-a SAR study. 41 st Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial agents and Chemotherapy, Chicago, USA, 16–19 December.Google Scholar
- 7.Prajakta V.D, Ravi Kanth B, Ramesh M, Srinivas N.R. (2005). Validation of a simple bioanalytical method for determination of DRF-6196, a novel oxazolidinone in mouse plasma: application to a single dose pharmacokinetic study. Drug Res., 55, 239–244.Google Scholar
- 8.Gibaldi M. and Perrier D. (1982). Pharmacokinetics, 2nd edn. New York: Marcel Dekker, pp. 409–417.Google Scholar
- 9.Murray B.E. Vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infections. (2000). New Eng. J. Med., 342, 710–721.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Thompson R.L, Cabezudo, I, Wenzel R.P. (1982). Epidemiology of noscomial infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Ann. Intern. Med., 97, 309–317.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Doem G.V, Pfaller M.A, Erwin M.E, Brueggemann A.B, Jones R.N. (1998). The prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance among clinically significant respiratory tract isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States and Canada-1997 results from the SENTRY antimicrobial Surveillance program. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis., 32, 313–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.McKellar Q.A, Sanchez Bruni S.F, Jones S.D. (2004). Pharmacokinetic /phar-macodynamic relationships of antimicrobial drugs used in veterinary medicine. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther., 27, 503–514.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar