Advertisement

Osteoporosis International

, Volume 1, Issue 4, pp 257–261 | Cite as

Age-related changes in resorption cavity characteristics in human trabecular bone

  • P. I. Croucher
  • N. J. Garrahan
  • R. W. E. Mellish
  • Juliette E. Compston
Original article

Abstract

The depth of resorption cavities in trabecular bone is an important determinant of bone structure and has implications relevant to the cellular pathophysiology of bone loss in osteoporosis. However, assessment of resorption depth has proved difficult and few data are available; in this study we report age-related changes in iliac crest trabecular bone obtained from 41 normal healthy subjects (21 female, 20 male) aged 22–80 years. Using 8-μm undecalcified sections stained with toluidine blue, resorption cavities were quantitatively assessed by a computerized technique in which the eroded bone surface is reconstructed and measurements made interactively. Maximum and mean cavity depth showed no significant correlation with age in either sex. The absolute length of eroded surface was unrelated to age but the eroded surface/BS (%) and the number of cavities/BS (/mm) showed a significant positive correlation with age (r=0.384 and 0.386 respectively,p<0.05). No significant correlation was found between age and either cavity area or density. These results suggest that increased resorption depth does not contribute to agerelated bone loss, although the possibility that deeper resorption cavities occur which result in trabecular penetration and are therefore unrecognizable cannot be discounted. The age-related increase in eroded surface/BS (%) reflects a decreased available trabecular surface and/or increased number of cavities rather than a greater surface length of individual cavities; alternatively it may indicate an increased resorption period. No evidence of increased resorption depth at the time of the menopause was found in this study.

Keywords

Resorption cavity Resorption depth Trabecular bone 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Courpron P, Lepine P, Ariot M, Lips P, Meunier PJ. Mechanisms underlying the reduction with age of the mean wall thickness of trabecular basic structure unit (BSU) in human iliac bone. In: Jee WSS, Parfitt AM, eds. Bone histomorphometry: 3rd international workshop, Armour Montagu, Paris 1980; 320–9.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Croucher PI, Mellish RWE, Vedi S, Garrahan NJ, Compston JE. The relationship between resorption depth and mean interstitial bone thickness: age-related changes in man. Calcif Tissue Int 1989; 45: 15–19.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eriksen EF, Melsen F, Mosekilde L. Reconstruction of the resorptive site in iliac trabecular bone: a kinetic model for bone resorption in 20 normal individuals. Metab Bone Dis Rei Res 1984; 5: 235–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Garrahan NJ, Croucher PI, Compston JE. A computerised technique for the quantitative assessment of resorption cavities in trabecular bone. Bone 1990; 11: 241–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vedi S, Compston JE, Webb A, Tighe JR. Histomorphometric analysis of bone biopsies from the iliac crest of normal British subjects. Metab Bone Dis Rei Res 1982; 4: 231–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Garrahan NJ, Mellish RWE, Vedi S, Compston JE. Measurement of mean trabecular plate thickness by a new computerized method. Bone 1987; 8: 227–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Palle S, Chappard D, Vico L, Riffat G, Alexandre C. Evaluation of the osteoclastic population in iliac crest biopsies from 36 normal subjects: a histoenzymologic and histomorphometric study. J Bone Miner Res 1989; 4: 501–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eriksen EF, Mosekilde L, Melsen F. Trabecular bone resorption depth decreases with age: differences between normal males and females. Bone 1985; 6: 141–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vedi S, Tighe JR, Compston JE. Measurement of total resorption surface in iliac crest trabecular bone in man. Metab Bone Dis Rel Res 1984; 5: 275–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Balanti P, Bonucci E, Rocca CD, Milani S, Cascio VL, Imbimbo B. Bone histomorphometric reference values in 88 normal Italian subjects. Bone Miner 1990; 11: 187–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schenk RK, Merz WA, Muller J. A quantitative histological study on bone resorption in human cancellous bone. Acta Anat 1969; 74: 44–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Meunier PJ, Edouard C, Courpron P. Morphometric analysis of trabecular resorption surface in normal iliac bone. In: Zaworski ZFG, ed. Proceedings of the first workshop on bone morphometry, Ottawa. University of Ottawa Press 1976; 156–60.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schulz A, Delling G. Age-related changes in bone resorption parameters in iliac crest trabecular bone. In: Zaworski ZFG, ed. Proceedings of the first workshop on bone morphometry, Ottawa. University of Ottawa Press 1976; 161–2.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Melsen F, Melsen B, Mosekilde L, Bergmann S. Histumorphometric analysis of normal bone from the iliac crest. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand (A) 1978; 86: 70–81.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Compston JE, Mellish RWE, Croucher PI. Newcombe R, Garrahan NJ. Structural mechanisms of trabecular bone loss in man. Bone Miner 1989; 6: 339–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Heaney RP, Recker RR, Saville PD. Menopausal changes in bone remodelling. J. Lab Clin Med 1978; 92: 964–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vedi S, Compston JE, Webb A, Tighe JR. Histomorphometric analysis of dynamic parameters of trabecular bone formation in the iliac crest of normal British subjects. Metab Bone Dis Rei Res 1983; 5: 69–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Courpron P. Bone tissue mechanisms underlying osteoporosis. Orthop Clin North Am 1981; 12: 513–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Eastell R, Delmas PO, Hodgson SF, Eriksen EF, Mann KG, Riggs BL. Bone formation rate in older normal women: concurrent assessment with bone histomorphometry, calcium kinetics, and biochemical markers. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1988; 67: 741–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Reeve J. A stochastic analysis uf iliac trabecular bone dynamics. Clin Orthop 1986; 213: 264–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wakamatsu E, Sissons HA. The cancellous bone of the iliac crest. Calcif Tissue Res 1969; 4: 147–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Foundation for Osteoporosis 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. I. Croucher
    • 1
  • N. J. Garrahan
    • 1
  • R. W. E. Mellish
    • 1
  • Juliette E. Compston
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PathologyUniversity of Wales College of MedicineHeath ParkUK
  2. 2.Department of MedicineUniversity of Cambridge Clinical School, Addenbrooke’s HospitalCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations