Science in China Series C: Life Sciences

, Volume 48, Supplement 2, pp 791–806 | Cite as

The development of policy approaches for reducing nitrogen pollution to coastal waters of the USA

  • Robert W. Howarth


Two-thirds of the coastal rivers and bays in the United States are degraded from nutrient pollution, and nitrogen inputs these waters continue to increase. The nitrogen comes from a variety of sources, including runoff from agricultural fields, concentrated animal feeding operations, atmospheric deposition from fossil fuel combustion, and sewage and septic wastes. Technical solutions for nitrogen pollution exist at reasonable cost. That most of these solutions have not yet been implemented to any significant extent across the United States suggests that new policy approaches are necessary. The best solution may involve a combination of voluntary and mandatory approaches, applying different approaches to different sources of nitrogen pollution. A watershed-based approach that relies heavily on voluntary mechanisms (such as crop-yield insurance to reduce over-fertilization) is likely to be the most effective for some sources of nitrogen (such as runoff from agricultural fields), while a uniform national regulatory approach may be better for others (such as NOx emissions from fossil fuel combustion). Implementation of management strategies should be carefully coupled to monitoring programs to assess the effectiveness of these strategies. While both nitrogen and phosphorus are important to control, the focus should be on nitrogen management, in part because nitrogen is more generally the causal agent of coastal eutrophication. Also, while nitrogen-control practices tend to also reduce phosphorus pollution, phosphorus-control practices often have little effect on nitrogen. Although current scientific and technical knowledge is sufficient to begin to make substantial progress toward solving coastal nitrogen pollution, progress will be made more quickly and more cost effectively with increased investment in appropriate scientific research.


development of policy approaches reducing nitrogen pollution coastal water of the USA 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bricker, S. B., Clement, C. G., Pirhalla, D. E., et al., National Estuarine Eutrophication Assessment: A Summary of Conditions, Historical Trends, and Future Outlook. Silver Springs: National Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1999.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    EPA, National Coastal Condition Report, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2001, EPA-620/R-01/005.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    NRC, Clean Coastal Waters: Understanding and Reducing the Effects of Nutrient Pollution, Washington: National Academy Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Howarth, R. W., Anderson, D., Cloern, J. et al., Nutrient pollution of coastal rivers, bays, and seas, Issues in Ecology, 2000, 7: 1–15.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boesch, D. F., Burroughs, R. H., Baker, J. E., et al., Marine Pollution in the United States: Significant Accomplishments, Future Challenges, Arlington: Pew Oceans Commission, 2001.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nixon, S. W., Coastal marine eutrophication: A definition, social causes, and future concerns, Ophelia, 1995, 41: 199–219.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ryther, J. H., Dunstan, W. M., Nitrogen, phosphorus, and eutrophication in the coastal marine environment, Science, 1971, 171: 1008–1012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Melillo, J. M., Cowling, E. B., Reactive nitrogen and public policies for environmental protection, Ambio, 2002, 31: 150–158.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    NRC, Managing Wastewater in Coastal Urban Areas, Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Howarth, R. W., Boyer, E., Pabich, W. et al., Nitrogen use in the United States from 1961 to 1997 with some future projections, Ambio, 2002, 31: 88–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jaworksi, N. A., Howarth, R. W., Hetling, L. J., Atmospheric deposition of nitrogen oxides onto the landscape contributes to coastal eutrophication in the Northeast US, Environmental Science & Technology, 1997, 31: 1995–2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goolsby, D. A., Battaglin, W. A., Lawrence, G. B. et al., Flux and sources of nutrients in the Mississippi-Atchafalaya River Basin; Topic 3. Report for the Integrated Assessment on Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico, Silver Spring: NOAA Coastal Ocean Program Decision Analysis Series, 1999, No. 17.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goolsby, D. A., Battaglin, W. A., Long-term changes in concentrations and flux of nitrogen in the Mississippi River basin, USA, Hydrological Processes, 2001, 15: 1209–1226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McIsaac, G. F., David, M. B., Gertner, G. Z., Eutrophication: Nitrate flux in the Mississippi River, Nature, 2001, 414: 166–167.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Howarth, R. W., Billen, G., Swaney, D., Regional nitrogen budgets and riverine N & P fluxes for the drainages to the North Atlantic Ocean: Natural and human influences, Biogeochemistry, 1996, 35: 75–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Howarth, R. W., Walker, D., Sharpley, A., Sources of nitrogen pollution to coastal waters of the United States, Estuaries, 2002, 25: 656–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chesapeake Bay Executive Council, Chesapeake Bay Agreement, Annapolis, 1987.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chesapeake Bay Executive Council, Chesapeake 2000 Agreement, Annapolis, 2000.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chesapeake Bay Executive Council, Chesapeake Bay Nutrient and Sediment Cap Load Allocation Document (draft), Annapolis, 2004.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Boesch, D. F., Brinsfield, R. B., Magnien, R. E., Chesapeake Bay eutrophication: Scientific understanding, ecosystem restoration, and challenges for agriculture, J. Envion. Qual., 2001, 30: 303–320.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Boesch, D. F., Reversing nutrient over-enrichment of coastal waters: Challenges and opportunities for science, Estuaries, 2002, 25: 744–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rabalais, N. N., Turner, R. E., Scavia, D., Beyond science into policy: Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia and the Mississippi River, Bio-Science, 2002, 52: 129–142Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Committee on Environment and Natural Resources (CENR), Integrated Assessment of Hypoxia in the Northern Gulf of Mexico, Washington DC: National Science and Technology Council, 2000.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Boyer, Ed W., Goodale, C. L., Jaworski, N. A. et al., Anthropogenic nitrogen sources and relationships to riverine nitrogen export in the northeastern USA, Biogeochemistry, 2002, 57/58: 137–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Valiela, I., Geist, M., McClelland, J. et al., Nitrogen loading frm watersheds to estuaries: Verification of the Waquoit Bay nitrogen loading model, Biogeochemistry, 2000, 49: 277–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Conley, D. J., Biogeochemical nutrient cycles and nutrient management strategies, Hydrobiologia, 2000, 41: 87–96.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    NRC, Soil and Water Quality: An Agenda for Agriculture, Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Randall, G. W., Mulla, D. J., Nitrate nitrogen in surface waters as influence by climatic conditions and agricultural practices, J. Environ. Qual., 2001, 30: 337–344.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mitsch, W. J., Day, J., Gilliam, J. W. et al., Reducing Nutrient Loads, Escpecially Nitrate-Nitrogen, to Surface Water, Ground Water, and the Gulf of Mexico, Topic 5. Report for the Integrated Assessment on Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico, Silver Spring: NOAA Coastal Ocean Program Decision Analysis Series, 1999, No. 19.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Randall, G. W., Huggins, D. R., Russelle, M. P. et al., Nitrate losses through subsurface tile drainage in CRP, alfalfa, and row crop systems, J. Environ. Qual., 1997, 26: 1240–1247.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Staver, K. W., Brinsfield, R. B., Use of cereal grain winter cover crops to reduce groundwater nitrate contamination in the Mid-Atlantic coastal plain, J. Soil Water Conserv, 1998, 53: 230–240.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mitsch, W. J., Day, J., Gilliam, J. W., Groffman, P. M. et al., Reducing nitrogen loading to the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi River basin: Strategies to counter a persistent ecological problem, BioScience, 2001, 51: 373–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vitousek, P. M., Aber, J. D., Howarth, R. W. et al., Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: Sources and consequences, Ecological Applications, 1997, 7: 737–750.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Choi, E., Yun, Z., in Proceedings of the Strong N and Agro 2003, IWA Specialty Symposium on Strong Nitrogenous and Agro-Wastewater, June 11–13, 2003, Seoul, Korea, 2003, 1, 118.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    EPA, National Air Pollutant Emission Trends 1900–1998, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-454/R-00-002., 2000.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mosier, A. R., Bleken, M. A., Chaiwanakupt, P. et al., Policy implications of human-accelerated nitrogen cycling, Biogeochemistry, 2001, 52: 281–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Moomaw, W., Energy, industry, and nitrogen: Strategies for decreasing reactive nitrogen emissions, Ambio, 2002, 31: 184–189.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Holland, E. A., Dentener, F. J., Braswell, B. H. et al., Contemporary and pre-industrial global reactive nitrogen budgets, Biogeochemistry, 1999, 46: 7–43.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    DEP, New York City 2000 Regional Harbor Survey, New York: New York City Department of Environmental Protection, 2001.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Novotny, V., Imhoff, K. R., Olthof, M. et al., Karl Imhoff’s Handbook of Urban Drainage and Wastewater Disposal, New York: Wiley, 1989.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Peterson, B. J., Wollheim, W. M., Mulholland, P. J. et al., Control of nitrogen exports from watersheds by headwater streams, Science, 2001, 292: 86–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    EPA, Nutrient Criteria Technical Guidance Manual for Estuarine and Coastal Marine Waters, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-822-B-01-003, 2001.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Howarth, R. W., Marino, R., Scavia, D., Priority Topics for Nutrient Pollution in Coastal Waters: An Integrated National Research Program for the United States, Silver Spring: NOAA National Ocean Service, 2003.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    US Commission on Ocean Policy, Final report posted to web site on September 20, 2004; Scholar
  45. 45.
    Powell, J. Programs that reduce nutrient polluton in coastal waters, Unpublished report to the Pew Oceans Commission, 2001.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    NRC, Assessing the Total Maximum Daily Load Approach to Water Quality Management, Washington DC: National Academy Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Doughty, R. S., Water quality trading between point and nonpoint sources: The importance of enforcement, Cornell University: MS thesis, 2003.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    EPA, Market-based Approaches to Improve the Nations Waters (Draft), U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, 2001.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    EPA, Final Water Quality Trading Policy, Fed. Reg., 68: 1608–01.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science in China Press 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert W. Howarth
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Ecology & Evolutionary BiologyCornell UniversityNYUSA

Personalised recommendations