Proceedings: Animal Sciences

, Volume 92, Issue 3, pp 185–191 | Cite as

Aggressive behaviour of captiveBandicota bengalensis

  • Shakunthala Sridhara
  • R V Krishnamoorthy


The aggressive behaviour rhythm ofBandicota hengalensis under different social conditions were studied in the laboratory. The number, intensity and duration of aggressive behaviour peaks varied depending on the number, sex and social status of the interacting conspecific /s. Significantly the peaks of aggression were recorded during the dark period. In heterosexual conflicts both sexes were equally belligerent. However in male interactions with more females, the former emerged dominant always. Similarly one male dominated another in male-male encounters. Confrontation amongst several males in the presence of female indicat ed the existence of onlyalpha andomega males.


Bandicota hengalensis aggressive behaviour male dominance alpha males omega males 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barnett S A 1975The rat: A study in behaviour, (Chicago: The University of Chicago press) pp. 124–125Google Scholar
  2. Barnett S A, Cowan P E and Prakash I 1975 Orcadian rhythms of movements of the house rat,Rattus rattus L.;Indian J. Exp. Biol. 13 153–155PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Calhoun J B 1975 Social modification of activity rhythms in rodents;Chronobiol. suppl. 1 11Google Scholar
  4. Farr L and Andrews RV 1978 Rank-associated desynchronization of metabolic and activity rhythms ofPeromyscus maniculatus in response to social pressure;Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A61 539–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Grant EC and Mackintosh J H 1963 A comparison of the social postures of some common laboratory rodents;Behaviour 21 246–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Landau IT 1975 Light-dark rhythms in aggressive behaviour of the male golden hamster;Physiol. Behav. 14 767–774.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Lerwill C 1977 Diurnal variations in the agonistic behaviour of the golden hamster (Mesocricetus auratus);J. Zool 182 159–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Marten P 1973 The patterns ofPeromyscus activity and their correlation with weather;J. Mammal 54 159–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Nygren J 1978 Inter individual influence on diurnal rhythms of activity in cycling and noncycling populations of the field vole,Microtus agrestis L., Oecologia 35 231–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Parrack DW 1966 The activity cycle of the lesser bandicoot ratBandicota bengalensis;Curr. Sci. 35 544–545Google Scholar
  11. Parrack D W and Thomas J 1970 The behaviour of the lesser bandicoot rat,Bandicota bengalensis (Gray and Hardwicke);J. Bombay Nat. Hist Soc. 67 67–80Google Scholar
  12. Possidente B and Birnbaum S 1979 Circadian rhythms for food and water consumption in the mouse,Mus musculus;Physiol. Behav. 22 657–660CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Siegel S 1956Non-Parametric Statistics for the behavioural Sciences (New York: McGraw-Hill) pp.Google Scholar
  14. Spillet J J 1968The ecology of the lesser bandicoot in Calcutta (Bombay: Bombay natural History Society) pp. 136–144Google Scholar
  15. Sridhara S and Krishnamoorthy RV 1982 Rhythmic oscillations in non-aggressive social behaviour inBandicota bengalensis;Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Anim. Sci.) 91 317–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shakunthala Sridhara
    • 1
  • R V Krishnamoorthy
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Vertebrate Biology and ZoologyUniversity of Agricultural Sciences, G K V KBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations