In this paper we focus on 3D simulation of unsteady wake flow behind a circular cylinder. We show that in addition to accurate formulations and sufficiently-refined meshes, efficient computing methods are essential components of an effective simulation strategy. We use the Multi-Domain Method (MDM) we developed recently in computation of two cases. At Reynolds number 300, we demonstrate how the MDM enables us to use highly-refined meshes to capture wake patterns which we otherwise cannot fully represent. At Reynolds number 140, we show that with the MDM we can extend our computations sufficiently downstream, and with sufficient accuracy, to successfully capture the second phase of the Karman vortex street, which has been observed in laboratory experiments, and which has double the spacing between the vortices compared to the first phase.
unsteady wake flow multi-domain method vortex shedding
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
 Y. Osawa, V. Kalro, and T. E. Tezduyar, “Multi-domain parallel computation of wake flows around secondary objects,” in Proceedings of the Fourth Japan-US Symposium on Finite Element Methods in Large-Scale Computational Fluid Dynamics, (1998).Google Scholar
 Y. Osawa, V. Kalro, and T. E. Tezduyar, “Multi-domain parallel computation of wake flows,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 174 (1999), 371–391.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 Y. Osawa and T. E. Tezduyar, “A multi-domain method for 3D computation of wake flow behind a circular cylinder,” Computational Fluid Dynamics Journal, 8 (1999), 296–308.Google Scholar
 A. N. Brooks and T. J. R. Hughes, “Streamline upwind/Petrov-Galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 32 (1982), 199–259.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
 T. E. Tezduyar, “Stabilized finite element formulations for incompressible flow computations,” Advances in Applied Mechanics, 28 (1991), 1–44.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar