Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Helping Hong Kong business students to appreciate how they learn

  • 49 Accesses

  • 6 Citations

Abstract

Hong Kong students enrolling in the tertiary sector exhibit tendencies to passivity and non-participation. There is also some evidence that, in common with other countries, the tertiary educational environment in Hong Kong may encourage the adoption of inappropriate approaches to learning. A programme was developed within the first year of a business studies degree with the purpose of enhancing students’ approach to learning. This was attempted by making them aware of different approaches, giving them the analytical tools to examine their own conceptions of and approaches to learning and by involving them in different forms of learning experience. Most students conceived ofieaming as a quantitative increase in knowledge. They exhibited similar patterns in respect of SPQ scores to other Hong Kong students, scoring slightly higher than their Australian peers with respect to “deep” and “achieving” approaches and slightly lower on the “surface” approach. Evaluation of the programme was based on a range of sources including unprompted views using the “slip” technique, course evaluation questionnaires and a second administration of the SPQ at the beginning of the students’ second year. The evaluation shows that student reaction to the programme was mixed, though with an overall balance in favour. The SPQ results showed.that although the mean scores for the “surface” approach rose and those for the “deep” and the “achieving” approach fell, they did so to a much lesser extent than on similar programmes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bannister, B., Jamieson, Q.W., and Kember, D. (1992). Reviewing Academic Programmes. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Polytechnic.

  2. Biggs, J.B. (1987a). Student Approaches to Learning and Studying. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.

  3. Biggs, J.B. (1987b). Study Process Questionnaire. Hawthorn, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.

  4. Biggs, J.B. (1989). ‘Approaches to the enhancement of tertiary teaching’, Higher Education Research and Development 8(1), 7–25.

  5. Biggs, J.B. (1992). Why and How Do Hong Kong Students Learn? Using the Learning and Study Process Questionnaires. University of Hong Kong: Education Papers, No. 14.

  6. Dart, B.C., and Clarke, J.A. (1991). ‘Helping students become better learners:a case study in teacher education’, Higher Education 23, 317–335.

  7. Eitington, J.E. (1989). The Winning Trainer. Houston: Gulf Publishing.

  8. Eley, M.G. (1992). ‘Differential adoption of study approaches within individual students’, Higher Education 23, 231–254.

  9. Gibbs, G. (1981). Teaching Students to Learn. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

  10. Gibbs, G. (1992). Improving the Quality of StUdent Learning. Bristol: Technical and Educational Services.

  11. Gow, L., Kember, D., and Cooper, B. (1991). The Teaching Context and Approaches to Study of Accountancy Students. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Polytechnic.

  12. Kember, D., and Gow, L. (1991) ‘A challenge to the anecdotal stereotype of the Asian student’, Studies in Higher Education 16(2), 117–128.

  13. Martin, E., and Ramsden, P. (1987). ‘Learning skills or skill in learning’, in Richardson, J.T.E., Eysenck, M.W., and Piper, D.W. (eds.), Student Learning: Research in Education and Cognitive Psychology. Milton Keynes: SRME and Open University. pp. 155–167.

  14. Marton, F., and Saljo, R. (1976). ‘On qualitative differences in learning, outcome and process’, British Journal of Educational Psychology 46, 4–11.

  15. Marton, F., Dall’Alba, G., and Beaty, E. (1993). ‘Conceptions of learning’, International Journal of Educational Research 19(3), 277–300.

  16. Ramsden, P., Beswick, D., and Bowden, J. (1986). ‘Effects oflearning skills interventions on first year university students’ learning’, Human Learning 5, 151–164.

  17. Saljo, R. (1979). Learning in the Leamer’s Perspective I ’ Some Commonsense Conceptions. Reports from the Institute of Education, University of Gothenburg, No. 77.

  18. Van Rossum, E.J., and Schenk, S.M. (1984). ‘The relationship between learning conception, study strategy and learning outcomes’. British Journal of Educational Psychology 54, 73–83.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Howard Davies.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davies, H., Sivan, A. & Kember, D. Helping Hong Kong business students to appreciate how they learn. High Educ 27, 367–378 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03179900

Download citation

Keywords

  • Business Student
  • Deep Approach
  • Business Study
  • Surface Approach
  • Study Skill