Advertisement

East Asia

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 22–44 | Cite as

Dragon’s underbelly: An analysis of China’s soft power

  • Yanzhong Huang
  • Sheng Ding
Articles

Abstract

Using both quantitative and qualitative data, this paper extends Joseph Nye’s analytical framework on soft power to the China case, in order to provide a more balanced and updated analysis of the country’s power status. We argue that the rise of China is not simply an expansion of hard power; it has also been accompanied by tremendous efforts to develop soft power. Soft power helps Beijing redraw geopolitical alliances in ways that will propel its rise as a global power. This process is nevertheless complicated by the deficiency of its soft power resources and the uneven progress in projecting the soft power abroad. The paper concludes that despite Beijing’s growing ability to shape other people’s worldview or political agenda, soft power remains Beijing’s underbelly and China still has a long way to go to become a true global leader.

Key words

soft power China culture Beijing Consensus peaceful rise bandwagoning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    For examples, see Zbigniew Brzezinski and John J. Mearsheimer, “Clash of the Titans,”Foreign Policy, 146 (Jan/Feb 2005), 46–50. Also see Robert D. Kaplan, “How We Would Fight China,”The Atlantic Monthly, June 2005. While Kaplan noticed that China “boasts soft as well as hard power,” the focus is on China’s military and economic strength.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Joseph S. Nye, Jr.Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics (New York: Public Affairs, 2004).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nye,Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power (New York: Basic Books, 1990), 31.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. H. Carr,The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations (New York: Harper & Row, 1964); Hans J. Morgenthau,Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1967); Klaus Knorr,The Power of Nations (New York: Basic Books, 1975); and Ray S. Cline,World Power Assessment (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1977).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Morgenthau,Politics among Nations, 106–158.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Joseph S. Nye Jr.,The Paradox of American Power: Why the World’s Only Superpower Can’t Go It Alone (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002), 1–2.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nye,Soft Power, Chapter 1.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nye,Bound to Lead, 32. Emphasis added.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang Huning, “Zuowei guojia shili de wenhua: Ruan quanli” (Culture as state power: Soft power),Fudan Xuebao (Fudan Journal), March 1993.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nye,Soft Power, 6.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ibid. Nye,Soft Power, 33.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    For a distinction between seduction and inducement, see Jon Elster,Local Justice: How Institutions Allocate Scarce Goods and Necessary Burdens (New York: Russell Sage Foundations, 1992), 140.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jon Elster,Political Psychology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 5.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nye,Soft Power, 6.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nye,The Paradox of American Power, 15–16.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    China Daily, 29 May 2006.Google Scholar
  17. 19.
    Wei Wanchuan, “Dongnanya huayi liushuesheng xuexi beijing qiantan” (A brief discussion on the background of overseas Chinese students in Southeast Asia learning Chinese),Dongnanya Zongheng (Around Southeast Asia), April 2004, 58.Google Scholar
  18. 20.
    See, for examples, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS),Zhongguo kechixu fazhan zhanlue baogao 2003 (Report on China’s Sustainable Development 2003); Project Team of China Institute of Contemporary International Relations (CICIR),Zonghe guoli pinggu yanjiu baogao (Research Report on the Evaluation System of Comprehensive National Power), 2000.Google Scholar
  19. 21.
    China Daily, 29 May 2006.Google Scholar
  20. 24.
    Nye,Soft Power, 11.Google Scholar
  21. 26.
    The Daily Telegraph, 23 October 2004, 4.Google Scholar
  22. 27.
    Nye,Soft Power, 56.Google Scholar
  23. 28.
    Joshua Cooper Ramo,Beijing Consensus, (London, U.K.: Foreign Policy Centre, 2004).Google Scholar
  24. 29.
    India Daily, 23 January 2005;The Japan Times, 12 January 2004; Ramo,Beijing Consensus, 34; Reuters News [http://www.iranian.ws/cgi-bin/iran_news/exec/view.cgi/2/1481] (assessed on 31 December 2005); andAsharq Alawsat, 24 June 2005;New York Times, 28 March 2004.Google Scholar
  25. 30.
    Financial Times, 9 July 2005.Google Scholar
  26. 31.
    US Congress, Senate Committee on Foreign Relations,Hearings: U.S. Policy with Respect to Mainland China (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1966), 551. Hereafter cited asChina Hearings.Google Scholar
  27. 32.
    Kenneth Lieberthal,Governing China: From Revolution through Reform (New York: W.W. Norton, 1995), 16.Google Scholar
  28. 33.
    Mencius,Mengzi zhengyi (Works of Mencius) (Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 1957).Google Scholar
  29. 34.
    Renmin ribao, overseas edition, 12 October 2005.Google Scholar
  30. 35.
    Confucius, Analects in J. Legge, trans.The Four books (Hong Kong: Wei Tung Book Co., 1971), 143.Google Scholar
  31. 36.
    Luo Guanzhong,Sanguo yanyi (Romance of the Three Kingdoms) (Jinan: Shandong renmin chubanshe, 1980), 748.Google Scholar
  32. 37.
    See Evan S. Medeiros and M. Taylor Fravel, “China’s New Diplomacy,”Foreign Affairs 82:6 (November/December 2003), 22–35.Google Scholar
  33. 38.
    PRC Ministry of Foreign Affairs, “China’s Position Paper on the New Security Concept,” 31 July 2002 [http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/wjb/zzjg/gjs/gjzzyhy/2612/2614/t15319.htm] (assessed on 26 July 2005).Google Scholar
  34. 39.
    Union of International Association,Yearbook of International Organization, vol. 2, 1994/1995 (New Providence: K.G. Saur, 1994), 1683.Google Scholar
  35. 40.
    See Bates Gill and James Reilly, “Sovereignty, Intervention and Peacekeeping: The View from Beijing,”Survival 42:3 (Autumn 2000), 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 41.
    Alistair Iain Johnston, “Is China a Status Quo Power?”International Security 27:4 (2003), 5–56; Daniel Rosen, “China and the World Trade Organization: An Economic Balance Sheet,”Policy Brief 99-6, Institute of International Economics, June 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 42.
    The Japan Times, 17 May 2004.Google Scholar
  38. 43.
    Renmin ribao (People’s Daily), overseas edition, 23 November 2005.Google Scholar
  39. 44.
    Ibid.,Renmin ribao (People’s Daily), overseas edition, 15 July 2005.Google Scholar
  40. 45.
    SeeDongfang Xinbang Economic Review, 16 December 2005.Google Scholar
  41. 46.
    Minxin Pei, “China’s Governance Crisis,”Foreign Affairs, 81:5 (Sep/Oct 2002), 96–109.Google Scholar
  42. 47.
    Andrew J. Nathan,Chinese Democracy (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1985); and Tang Tsou,Ershi shiji zhongguo zhengzhi (Chinese Politics in the 20th century) (Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 1994), 45.Google Scholar
  43. 48.
    Lieberthal,Governing China, 8–9.Google Scholar
  44. 49.
    Alastair Iain Johnston,Cultural Realism: Strategic Culture and Grand Strategy in Chinese History (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
  45. 50.
    Lieberthal,Governing China, 5.Google Scholar
  46. 51.
    David M. Lampton,Same Bed, Different Dreams: Managing U.S.-China Relations 1989–2000 (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2001), 251–2.Google Scholar
  47. 52.
    Johnston,Cultural Realism, 256.Google Scholar
  48. 53.
    Peter Hays Gries,China’s New Nationalism: Pride, Politics, and Diplomacy (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2004).Google Scholar
  49. 55.
    Nye,Soft Power, 100.Google Scholar
  50. 57.
    Zheng Bijian, “China’s peaceful rise and opportunities for the Asia-Pacific Region,”China Strategy, 3 (July 20, 2004), 2. See also Zheng, “China’s ‘Peaceful Rise’ to Great-Power Status,”Foreign Affairs 84:5 (September/October 2005).Google Scholar
  51. 58.
    Kenneth N. Waltz,Theory of International Politics (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1979).Google Scholar
  52. 59.
    John J. Mearsheimer,The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: W.W. Norton, 2001).Google Scholar
  53. 61.
    David C. Kang, “Getting Asia Wrong: The Need for New Analytical Frameworks,”International Security 27: 4 (Spring 2003), 57–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 62.
    Stephen M. Walt,The Origins of Alliances (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
  55. 63.
    Ibid. Unless noted otherwise, the following analyses that led to the three propositions are based on Chapter 2, “Explaining Alliance Formation,” 17–49.Google Scholar
  56. 65.
    Washington Post, 31 July 2005.Google Scholar
  57. 66.
    Nye,Soft Power, 18.Google Scholar
  58. 69.
    The International Herald Tribune, 14 May 2005.Google Scholar
  59. 70.
    Washington Post, 26 February 2005.Google Scholar
  60. 72.
    Reuters, “Chavez ponders Mao and Bolivar friendship,” 24 December 2004;New York Times, 1 March 2005.Google Scholar
  61. 73.
    New York Times, 20 November 2004.Google Scholar
  62. 75.
    Paul Mooney, “China’s Africa Saffari,”Yale Global Online, 3 January 2005.Google Scholar
  63. 76.
    Committee of 100,American Attitudes toward China, January-April 2005.Google Scholar
  64. 77.
    Robert Sutter, “Why Does China Matter,”The Washington Quarterly 7: 1 (Winter 2003/04).Google Scholar
  65. 78.
    Melinda Liu and John Barry, “China: Soft Power, Hard Choices,”Newsweek, March 7, 2005.Google Scholar
  66. 79.
    The Sydney Morning Herald, 24 March 2005.Google Scholar
  67. 81.
    New York Times, 5 August 2005.Google Scholar
  68. 82.
    New York Times, 28 March 2005.Google Scholar
  69. 83.
    Nye, “Soft power in the information age,” luncheon on the Harvard campus, 2 May 2000, available athttp://wwwjreemedia.at/Boston_Congress_Report/boston36.htm (assessed on 1 June 2006).Google Scholar
  70. 84.
    New York Times, 26 November 2005.Google Scholar
  71. 85.
    China Hearings, 554–558.Google Scholar
  72. 86.
    Nye, ‘Why Military Power is No Longer Enough’,Observer Worldview, 31 March 2002, available athttp://observer.guardian.co.uklworldview/story/0,11581,676169,00.html (assessed on 1 June 2006).Google Scholar
  73. 87.
    Randall G. Schriver, “The President’s Agenda,” in National Committee on US-China Relations, “In Review: President Bush’s Visit to Beijing,” Email Broadcast, 1 December 2005.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yanzhong Huang
  • Sheng Ding

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations