Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

# Orthogonal plans of resolution IV and V

• 45 Accesses

• 2 Citations

## Summary

In many experimental situations, when a two-level factorial design is performed, the effects of higher order interactions are usually less important than the effects of lower order interactions (and effects of the same order are equally important). Hence, we should search for good fractional factorial designs withN observations allowing for the estimation of the effects of main factors and of some interactions under study. Obviously, a design is more preferable it if allows for several de-aliased estimates of the effects of interest. A goodness criterion of a design is its resolution (Box & Hunter (1961)). Since there is more than one design with the same resolution, to select the «best» subset of designs which have the same resolution (usually the maximum resolution), we may use the criterion of minimum aberration (Fries & Hunter (1980)). In experiments involving control and noise factors (Taguchi (1987)) neither the resolution nor the aberration criterion can guarantee a good statistical design. Here we introduce the degrees of freedom criterion in order to guarantee a good choice of the fractional design also in terms of the possibility to perform parametric tests with a good power and to obtain confidence intervals for the effects’ estimates. The two level orthogonal factorial designs are suitable for experiments with linear response, since they give the possibility to obtain uniformly optimal de-aliased estimates of the effects of interest. Here we consider the case where three and higher factor interactions are negligible and orthogonal designs of resolution IV and V are constructed; the necessary conditions for the existence of such designs areN0 mod 8, andN0 mod 16,N ≥16, respectively. Some cases whenN0 mod 8,N ≥ 8, orN0 mod 16,N ≥ 16, are studied: at first we construct orthogonal designs of resolution IV and V for a given number of factors k, and then for a given number of runsN (in particularN=48, 80, 96, 112).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

## References

1. Addelman, S. (1961), frregular fractions of the 2n factorial experiments.Technometrics, 3, pp. 479–196.

2. Bose, R. C., Bush, K. A. (1952), Orthogonal arrays of strength two and three.Ann. Math. Statist., 23, pp. 508–524.

3. Box, G. E. P., Hunter, J.S. (1961), The 2k−p fractional factorial designs.Technometrics, 3, pp. 311–351 and pp. 449-458.

4. Chen, J., Feder, M., Sriter, R. R. (1997), Fractional resolution and minimum aberration in blocked 2n−k designs.Technometrics, 39, pp. 382–390.

5. Chen, J., Sun, D. X., Wu, C. F. J. (1993), A Catalogue of two level and three level fractional factorial designs with small runs.Int. Statist. Rev., 61, pp. 131–145.

6. Draper, N. R., Mitchell, T. J. (1970), Constmction of a set of 512-run designs of resolution ≥ 5 and a set of even 1024-run designs of resolution ≥ 6.Ann. Math. Statist., 41, pp. 876–887.

7. Fontana, R. (1995), Misti: un algoritmo per la costruzione di piani fattoriali frazionari regolari.Statistica Applicata, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 49–77.

8. Fontana, R., Pistone, G., Rogantin, M. P. (1997), Algebraic generation of two-levels orthogonal designs,Statistica Applicata, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 15–29.

9. Franklin, M. F. (1984), Constructing tables of minimum aberrationpp nkdesigns.Technometrics, 26, pp. 225–232.

10. Fries, A., Hunter, W. G. (1980), Minimum aberration2 nk designs.Technometrics, 22, pp. 601–608.

11. Fujii, Y. (1976), An upper bound of resolution in symmetrical fractional factorial designs.Ann. Statist., 4, pp. 662–667.

12. Giovagnoli, A., Pannone, M. A. (1981), Metodi algebrici per la costruzione di disegni fattoriali.Quaderno del gruppo di ricerca Geometrie Finite — Combinatoria, 3, Dipartimento di Matematica, Unversità di Perugia, Perugia.

13. Gulati, B. R., Kounias, S. (1970), On bounds useful in the theory of symmetrical factorial designs.Jour Roy. Stat. Soc., series B, 32, pp. 123–133.

14. Hedayat, A. S., Seiden, E., Stufken, J. (1997), On the maximum number of factors and the enumeration of 3-symbol orthogonal arrays of strength 3 and index 2.Jour Stat. Plann. Inf., 58, pp. 43–63.

15. Hedayat, A. S., Sloane, N. J. A., Stufken, J. (1999),Orthogonal arrays. Theory and applications, New York: Springer-Verlag.

16. Kounias, S., Pmos, C. I. (1975), Orthogonal arrays of strength three and four with index unity.Sankhya, series B, 37, Pt. 2, pp. 228–240.

17. Kounias, S., Salmaso, L. (1997), Experimental designs of resolutionIII, IV, WandV. InProceedings of the Greek Statistical Institute Conference, GSI Edition — Athens, 190–199.

18. Laycock, P. J., Rowley, P. J. (1995), A method for generating and labelling all orthogonal fractions or blocks forq nm designs.Jour Roy. Stat. Soc., series B, 57, pp. 191–204.

19. Margolin, B. H. (1969), Resolution IV fractional factorial designs.J. R. Statist. Soc., B, 31, pp. 514–523.

20. Plackett, R. L., Burman, J. P. (1946), The design of optimum multifactorial experiments.Biometrika, 33, pp. 305–325.

21. Raghabarao, D. (1988),Construction and combinatorial problems in designs of experiments, New York: Dover Publications.

22. Rao, C. R. (1947), Factorial experiments derivable from combinatorial arrangements of arrays.Jour Roy. Statist. Soc., Suppl., 9, pp. 128–139.

23. Robillard, P. (1968), Combinatorial problems in the theory of factorial designs and error correcting codes.Instit. Statist. Mimeo Ser 594, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.

24. Seiden, E., Zemach, R. (1966), On orthogonal arrays.Ann. Math. Statist., 37, pp. 1355–1370.

## Author information

Correspondence to Luigi Salmaso.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions