Effects of internal and external scatter on the build-up characteristics of Monte Carlo calculated absorbed dose for electron irradiation

Scientific Note
Received:
Accepted:
  • 45 Downloads

Abstract

The effects of internal and external scatter on surface, build-up and depth dose characteristics simulated by Monte Carlo code EGSnrc for varying field size and SSD for a 10 MeV monoenergetic electron beam with and without an accelerator model are extensively studied in this paper. In particular, sub-millimetre surface PDD was investigated. The percentage depth doses affected significantly by the external scatter show a larger build-up dose. A forward shifted Dmax depth and a sharper fall-off region compared to PDDs with only internal scatter considered. The surface dose with both internal and external scatter shows a marked decrease at 110 cm SSD, and then slight further changes with the increasing SSD since few external scattered particles from accelerator model can reach the phantom for large SSDs. The sharp PDD increase for the 5 cm × 5 cm field compared to other fields seen when only internal scatter is considered is significantly less when external scatter is also present. The effect of external scatter on surface PDD is more pronounced for large fields than small fields (5 cm × 5 cm field).

Key words

Monte Carlo electron irradiation internal and external scatter surface dose build-up characteristics 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Mobit, P. N., Mayles, P. and Nahum, A. E.,Quality dependence of LiF-TLD in megavoltage photon beams: Monte Carlo simulation and experiments, Phys. Med. Biol., 41:387–398, 1996.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Butson, M., Cheung, T., Yu, P. and Metcalfe, P.,Effects on skin dose from unwanted air gaps under bolus in photon beam radiotherapy, Radiation Measurements, 32:201–204, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kron, T., Elliot, A., Wong, T., Showell, G., Clubb, B. and Metcalfe, P.,X-ray surface dose measurement using TLD extrapolation, Med. Phys., 20:703–711, 1993.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Saw, C. B., Ayyangar, K. M., Pawlicki, T. and Korb, L. J.,Effects of Extended SSD on Electron-Beam Depth-dose Curves, Medical Dosimetry, 19(2):77, 1994.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Das, I. J., McGee, K. P. and Cheng, C. W.,Electron-beam characteristics at extended treatment distances, Med. Phys., 22(10):1667–1672, 1995.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ebert, M. A. and Hoban, P. W.,A Monte Carlo investigation of Electron Beam Applicator Scatter, Med. Phys., 22(9):1431–1435, 1995.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Battum, L. J., van Zee, W. and Huizenga, H.,Scattered radiation from applicators in clinical electron beams, Phys. Med. Biol., 48:2493–2507, 2003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lin, H., Wu, D. S. and Wu, A. D.,Effects of treatment distance and field size on build-up characteristics of Monte Carlo calculated absorbed dose for electron irradiation, Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med., 27(4): 219–223, 2004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kawrakow, I. and Rogers, D. W. O.,The EGSnrc code system: Monte Carlo simulations of electron and photon transport, NRCC Report PIRS-701, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, 2001.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Williams, W. and Dyson, B.,Gray's Anatomy, 37th ed., Churchill Livingston, London, 1989.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hopewell, J. W.,Biological effects of irradiation on skin and recommended dose limits, Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 39:11–24, 1991.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    ICRP60. 1990Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, Pergamon, Oxford. 1991.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    ICRU39,Determination of Dose Equivalent Resulting from External Radiation Sources, ICRU, Bethesda, 1985.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chibani, O. and Li, A.,Monte Carlo dose calculations in homogeneous media and at interfaces: A comparison between GEPTS, EGSnrc, MCNP, and measurements, Med. Phys., 29(5): 835–847, 2002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ma, C. M. and Jiang, S. B.,Topical Review: Monte Carlo modelling of electron beams from medical accelerators, Phys. Med. Biol., 44:R157-R189, 1999.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Reynaert, N., Palmans, H., Thierens, H. and Jeraj, R.,Parameter dependence of the MCNP electron transport in determining dose distributions, Med. Phys., 29(10):2446–2454, 2002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Saw, et al.,Dose Distribution considerations of Medium Energy electron beams at extended source-to-surface distance, Int. J. Radiation Oncology Biol. Phys., 32(1):159, 1995.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    ICRP59.The biological basis for dose limitation in the skin, Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1992.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ostwald, P. and Kron, T.,Clinical use of carbon-loaded thermoluminescent dosimeters for skin dose determination, Int. J. Radiation Oncology Biol. Phys., 33(4):943–950, 1995.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Eheman, C.R., McFee, M., Seldon. S. and Eichholz, G.,Measuring the skin dose from radioactively contaminated gold rings using LiF thermoluminescent powder, Health Phys., 56:547–550. 1989.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Physics and Mathematics DepartmentHefei University of TechnologyHefei, AnhuiChina
  2. 2.Adult Education DepartmentHefei University of TechnologyHefeiChina
  3. 3.Radiation Oncology DepartmentAnhui Province HospitalHefeiChina

Personalised recommendations