A standard approach to measurement uncertainties for scientists and engineers in medicine

Educational Note

Abstract

The critical nature of health care demands high performance levels from medical equipment. To ensure these performance levels are maintained, medical physicists and biomedical engineers conduct a range of measurements on equipment during acceptance testing and on-going quality assurance programs. Wherever there are measurements, there are measurement uncertainties with potential conflicts between the measurements made by installers, owners and occasionally regulators. Prior to 1993, various methods were used to calculate and report measurement uncertainties. In 1993, the International Organization for Standardization published the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM). The document was jointly published with six international organizations principally involved in measurements and standards. The GUM is regarded as an international benchmark on how measurement uncertainty should be calculated and reported. Despite the critical nature of these measurements, there has not been widespread use of the GUM by medical physicists and biomedical engineers. This may be due to the complexity of the GUM. Some organisations have published guidance on the GUM tailored to specific measurement disciplines. This paper presents the philosophy behind the GUM, and demonstrates, with a medical physics measurement example, how the GUM recommends uncertainties be calculated and reported.

Key words

uncertainty error accuracy GUM measurement 

References

  1. 1.
    South Australian Government,Radiation Protection and Control (Ionising Radiation) Regulations 2000, Government Gazette, 2000.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Craig, A. R., Heggie, J. C. P., McLean, I. D., Coakley, K. S. and Nicoll, J. J.,Recommendations for a mammography quality assurance program, Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med., 24(3):107–131, 2001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McCollough, C. H. and Zink, F. E.,Performance evaluation of a multi-slice CT scanner, Med. Phys., 26:2223–2230, 1999.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Luketina, I. A., Greig, L.,Linear accelerator output Variability, Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med., 27(3):155–159, 2004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nobels, F., Beckers, F., Bailleul, E., De Schrijver, P., Sierens, L., Van Crombrugge, P.,Feasibility of a quality assurance programme of bedside blood glucose testing in a hospital setting: 7 years' experience, Diabet. Med., 21(12):1288–91, 2004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    International Organization for Standardization,Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 1995.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hinkle, D., Wiersma, W., and Jurs, S.,Applied Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences, Houghton Miffin, Boston, 2002.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    EURACHEM,Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement, Laboratory of the Government Chemist, London, 1995.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    International Atomic Energy Agency,Quantifying uncertainty in nuclear analytical measurements, TECDOC 1401, IAEA, Vienna, 2004.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bentley R. E.,Applying the ISO Guide to the calculation of uncertainty: temperature, National Measurement Laboratory, Sydney, 2001.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Taylor, B. N., Kuyatt, C. E.,Guidelines for evaluating and expressing the uncertainty of NIST measurement results, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, 1994.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bentley R. E.,Uncertainty in measurement: The ISO Guide, 6th ed., National Measurement Laboratory, Sydney, 2003.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pentz, M., Shott, M.,Handling Experimental Data, Open University Press, Milton Keynes, 1988.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kirkup, L.,Experimental methods: an introduction to the analysis and presentation of data, John Wiley & Sons, Milton, 1994.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    International Atomic Energy Agency,Absorbed Dose Determination in External Beam Radiotherapy: An International Code of Practice for Dosimetry based on Standards of Absorbed Dose to Water, TRS-398, IAEA, Vienna, 2000.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Electrical and Information Engineering (Applied Physics)University of South AustraliaMawson LakesAustralia
  2. 2.Radiation Protection DivisionEPAKent TownAustralia
  3. 3.Division of Medical ImagingWomen’s and Children’s HospitalNorth AdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations