Advertisement

Carbonates and Evaporites

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 118–132 | Cite as

Geology and trona potential of the middle Miocene Gürün (Sivas) basin, Central Anatolia, Turkey

  • Mehmet Önal
  • Cahit Helvaci
  • Fuat Ceyhan
Article

Abstract

Gürün (Sivas) basin, extending along east-west direction, contains a volcano-sedimentary sequence of up to 1222 m thick. The middle Miocene sedimentary sequence rest with angular unconformity on the basement rocks, which consist of limestone and flysch sediments ranging in Triassic-Jurassic-Cretaceous and middle-upper Eocene. The sequence has been subdivided into Gürün Formation and Karadaĝ Volcanics. The Gürün Formation consist of four members in ascending order: Kavak, Gökpinar, Çayboyu and Terzioĝlu members. Trona occurences are placed within the Terzioĝlu member, alternating with bituminous shale, mudstones and tuffs; whereas the lignite deposits occured in the Çayboyu member of the Gürün Formation.

The Miocene sedimentary rock units are laterally and vertically gradational. Karadaĝ volcanics, located in the eastern and northern parts of basin, interfinger with the upper parts of the Terzioĝlu member, and also cut the whole rock units. The thickness of the sequence increases towards the northern and eastern sides where the basin was faulted. According to spor and pollen fossils, the age of sedimentary rock units is middle Miocene. The rock units were deposited in alluvial, fluvial, lacustrine and playa-lake environments.

The middle Miocene sedimentary sequence, which were deposited under the control of a tectonic regime. In the region, gravity tectonic, which is characterized by the growth faults, began to developed in the beginning of middle Miocene. The growth faults, which were developed at the northern margin of the basin, controlled the deposition during the middle Miocene. Gürün basin was affected by the extensional tectonic regime changed to a compressional regime during the late Miocene time. During this new tectonic phase, NE, SW compressional regime occuring in the region probably originated from the movement of the East Anatolian Fault.

The bituminous shales of the Terzioĝlu member contains starkeite, hexzahydrite, dolomite and calcite. Na-carbonate (trona) leachings are rather common within the lower and middle parts of the Terzioĝlu member. Sodium carbonate minerals occuring in the basin are nahcolite, pirssonite, gaylusite and shortite. The beds consisting of the Na-carbonate minerals grade into mudstones and clayey limestones towards the edges of the basin.

The Gürün middle Miocene basin is mainly filled by clastics and products of adjacent volcanic activity which was centered at the east and north of basin. The most likely sources of sodium for the formation of Na-carbonate (trona) accurences are thermal springs, tuff interbedded with the sediments, and extensive the middle Miocene volcanic rocks interfingering with the sedimentary rocks in the eastern and northern parts of the basin.

Keywords

geology trona potential middle Miocene Gürün basin Central Anatolia 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AKKU§, M.F., 1971, Darende-Balaban havzasinin jeolojik stratigrafik incelemesi:M.T.A. Der., v. 76, p. 1–60.Google Scholar
  2. ATABEY, E., BAĜIRSAKÇI, S., CANPOLAT, M., GÖKKAYA, K.Y., GÖKKAYA, K.Y., GÜNAL, S., and KILÇ, N., 1994, Gürün, Kangal (Sivas) — Darende — Hekimhan (Malatya) Arasinin Jeolojisi:M.T.A. Rap., no. 9760, p. 312.Google Scholar
  3. AZIZ, A. and ERAKMAN, B., 1980, Tufanbeyli (Adana) — Sariz (Kayseri) — Gürün (Sivas) ilçeleri Arasinda Kalan Alanin Jeolojisi ve Hidrokarbon Olanaklan:T.P.A.O. Rap., no. 1526, p. 100.Google Scholar
  4. AZIZ, A., ERAKMAN, B., KURT, G., and ME§HUR, M., 1982, Pinarba§i-Sariz-Gürün Ilceleri Arasinda Kalan Kismin Jeoloji Raporu:T.P.A.O. Rap., no. 1601, p. 286.Google Scholar
  5. AZIZ, A., ME§HUR, M., and SERDAR, H.S., 1979, Sariz-Pinarbasi-Kaynak Dolayinin Jeoloji ve Hidrokarbon Olanaklari:T.P.A.O. Rap., no. 1357, p. 180.Google Scholar
  6. BORDENAVE, M.L., ESPITALIE, J., LEPLAT, P., OUIDIN, J.L. and VANDENBROUCKE, M., 1993, Screening Tecniques For Source Rock Evaluation.In M.L. Bordenava, ed., Applied Geochemistry. Paris, p. 219–277.Google Scholar
  7. BRADLEY, W.H., 1973, Oil Shale Formed in Desert Environment, Green River Formation, Wyoming:Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 84, p. 1121–1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. CEYHAN, F., HELVACI, C., and ÖNAL, M., 2001, Gürün (Sivas) Volkanitlerinin Petrografi, Jeokimya ve Petrojenez Özellikleri:Geosound, no. 39, p. 1–12. Çukurova University.Google Scholar
  9. ERKAN, E., ÖZER, S., SÜMERGEN, M., and TERLEMEZ, I., 1978, Sariz-Şarkişla-Gemerek-Tomarza Arasinin Temel Jeolojisi:M.T.A. Rap., no. 6546, p. 278.Google Scholar
  10. EUGSTER, H.P. and HARDIE, L.A., 1975, Sedimentation in Ancient Playa-Lake Complex: the Wilkins Peak Member of The Green River Formation of Wyoming:Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 86, p. 319–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. EUGSTER, H.P. and SURDAM, R.C., 1973, Depositional Environment of the Green River Formation of Wyoming: A Preliminary Report:Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 84, p. 115–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. GRANIT, S., 1990, Darende-Gürün Dolayinin Jeolojisi ve Petrol Olanaklari:M.T.A., Rap., no. 9048, p. 120.Google Scholar
  13. HELVACI, C., 1998, The Beypazari Trona Deposit, Ankara Province, Turkey:Wyoming State Geological Survey Circular, no. 40, p. 67–103.Google Scholar
  14. HELVACI, C., INCI, U., YILMAZ, H., and YAĜMURLU, F., 1989, Geology and Neogene Trona Deposit of Beypazan Region, Turkey:Turkish Journal of Engineering and Environmental Sciences, v. 13, p. 245–256.Google Scholar
  15. INCI, U., 1991, Miocene Alluvial Fan-Alkaline Playa Lignite-Trona Bearing Deposits from an Inverted Basin in Anatolia: Sedimentology and Tectonics Controls on Deposition:Sedimentary Geology, v. 71, p. 73–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. INCI, U., HELVACI, C., and YAĜMURLU, F., 1988, Stratigraphy of Beypazan Neogene Basin, Central Anatolia, Turkey:Newsl. Stratigr., v. 18, no. 3, p. 165–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. KURTMAN, F., 1978, Gürün Bölgesinin Jeolojisi ve Tektonik Özellikleri:M.T.A. Der., v. 91, p. 1–12.Google Scholar
  18. LUNDELL, L.L. and SURDAM, R.C., 1975, Playa-lake Deposition, Green River Formation, Piceance Greek Basin, Colorado.Geology, v. 3, p. 493–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. MCKENZIE, D.P., 1972, Active Tectonics of the Mediterranean Region:Geops. J.R. Astron. Soc., v. 30, p. 109–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. ÖNAL, M., HELVACI, C., and CEYHAN, F., 2001, Gürün (Sivas) Orta Miyosen Havzasinin Jeolojisi:T.P.J.D. Bült., c. 13, s. 1, p. 19–134.Google Scholar
  21. ÖZGÜL, N., 1981, Munnzur Daĝlarinin Jeolojisi:M.T.A., Rap., no. 6995, p. 200.Google Scholar
  22. ÖZGÜL, N., METIN, S., GOGER, E., BILGÖL, I., BAYDAR, O., and ERDOĜAN, B., 1973, Tufanbeyli Dolayinin Kambriyen ve Tersiyer Kayalari:T.J.K. Bült., v. 1b/1, p. 82–100.Google Scholar
  23. ŞAROĜLU, F. and YILMAZ, Y., 1987, Doĝu Anadolu’da Neotektonik Dönemdeki Jeolojik Evrim ve Havza Modelleri:M.T.A. Der., v. 107, p. 73–94.Google Scholar
  24. ŞENGÖR, A.M.C., 1980, Fundamentals of the Neotectonics of Turkey. Special Publication of the Geological Society of Turkey, v. 2, p. 40.Google Scholar
  25. ŞENGÖR, A.M.C., GÖRÜR, N., and ŞAROĜLU, F., 1985, Strike-slip Faulting and Related Basin Formation in Zone of Tectonics Escape, Turkey as a case study:In K.T. Biddle and N. Christie-Blinks, eds., Strike-slip Faulting and Basin Formation. SEPM Special Publication, v. 37, p. 227–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. ŞENGÖR, A.M.C. and YILMAZ, Y., 1981, Tethyan Evolution of Turkey; A Plate Tectonic Approach:Tectonophysics, v. 75, p. 181–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. SURDAM, R.C. and STANLEY, K.O., 1979, Lacustrine Sedimentation During the Culminating Phase of Eocene Lake Gosiute, Wyoming (Green River Formation):Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 70, p. 93–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. SURDAM, R.C. and WOLFBAUER, C.A., 1975, Green River Formation, Wyoming: A Playa-lake Complex:Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 86, p. 335–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. YAĜMURLU, F. and HELVACI, C., 1994, Sedimentological Characteristics and Facies of the Evaporite-bearing Kirmir Formation (Neogene), Beypazari Basin, Central Anatolia, Turkey,Sedimentology, v. 41, p. 847–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. YAĜMURLU, F., HELVACI, C., INCI, U., and ÖNAL, M., 1988, Tectonic Characteristics and Structural Evolution of the Beypazari- Nallihan Neogene Basin, Central Anatolia:Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences Series A “Geo-Sciences” I, p. 127–143.Google Scholar
  31. YILMAZ, Y., GÜRPINAR, O., and YIĜITBAŞ, E., 1988, Amanos Daĝlari ve Maraş Dolayinda Miyosen Havzalarinin Tektonik Evrimi:T.P.J.D. Bülteni, C. 1/1, p. 52/72.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mehmet Önal
    • 1
  • Cahit Helvaci
    • 2
  • Fuat Ceyhan
    • 3
  1. 1.Maden Mühendisliĝi BölümüInönü ÜniversitesiMalatyaTurkey
  2. 2.Jeoloji Mühendisliĝi BölümüDokuz Eylül ÜniversitesiIzmirTurkey
  3. 3.Jeoloji Mühendisliĝi BölümüCumhuriyet ÜniversitesiSivasTurkey

Personalised recommendations