Acta Analytica

, 17:19 | Cite as

Primitive worlds

  • Takashi Yagisawa
Article

Abstract

Modal Dimensionalism is a metaphysical theory about possible worlds that is naturally suggested by the often-noted parallelism between modal logic and tense logic. It says that the universe spreads out not only in spatiotemporal dimensions but also in a modal dimension. It regards worlds as nothing more or less than indices in the modal dimension in the way analogous to the way in which Temporal Dimensionalism regards temporal points and intervals as indices in the temporal dimension. Despite its naturalness and intuitive appeal. Modal Dimensionalism has been largely ignored while the debates between David Lewis and his critics have dominated the discourse on the nature of possible worlds. It is high time that we took Modal Dimensionalism seriously as a viable alternative.

Keywords

Metaphysics Modality Possible Worlds David Lewis Realism Time Index 

References

  1. Adams, R. 1974: ‘Theories of Actuality’,Nous 8, 211–31.Google Scholar
  2. Camap, R. 1947:Meaning and Necessity, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cresswell, M. 1972: ‘The World is Everything That is the Case’,Australasian Journal of Philosophy 50, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Forrest, P. 1986: ‘Ways Worlds Could Be’,Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64, 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Grim, P. 1991:The Incomplete Universe, Cambridge, MA: A Bradford Book, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Kripke, S. 1980:Naming and Necessity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Lewis, D. 1973:Counterfactuals, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Lewis, D. 1983:Philosophical Papers I, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lewis, D. 1986:On the Plurality of Worlds, Oxford and New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. Lycan, W. 1979: ‘The Trouble with Possible Worlds’,The Possible and the Actual: Readings in the Metaphysics of Modality, Loux, M. (ed.), Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 274–316.Google Scholar
  11. Plantinga, A. 1974:The Nature of Necessity, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  12. Salmon, N. 1996: ‘Trans-World Identification and Stipulation’,Philosophical Studies 84, 203–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Shalkowski, S. 1994: ‘The Ontological Ground for the Alcthic Modality’,Philosophical Review 103, 669–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Stalnaker, R. 1976: ‘Possible Worlds’,Nous 10, 65–75.Google Scholar
  15. Quine, W. 1976: ‘Worlds Away’,Journal of Philosophy 73, 859–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Zalta, E. 1987: ‘On the Structural Similarities Between Worlds and Times’,Philosophical Studies 51, 213–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Takashi Yagisawa
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyC.S.U.N.NorthridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations