Advertisement

Transmission loss estimation of splitter silencer using multi-domain BEM

  • Hyeon-Don Ju
  • Shi-Bok Lee
  • Young-Bum Park
Dynamics, Vibration, and Control

Abstract

This paper suggests a practical method, based on multi-domain BEM, to calculate the transmission loss of 3-dimensional silencers of subdomains comprised of different geometric and material characteristics with looped and/or cascaded connections. We previously proposed an efficient method to compute the transmission loss for 3-dimensional silencers using multi-domain BEM but its application is much difficult to those having looped subdomains [1]. Here, we adopt a method summing the impedance matrices of the subdomains with various types of connection represented by system graph. The algebraic overall condensed acoustic equations having only particle velocities on the subdomain interface boundaries as unknowns are formulated. A splitter silencer of cascaded, looped and symmetric connections as a sample problem is dealt with for the explanation and verification of the proposed method. An experimental work with the splitter silencer is performed to back up the suggested method.

Keywords

Transmission loss Cascaded Loop and symmetric connections Multi-domain BEM(Boundary Element Method) Splitter silencer System graph 

References

  1. [1]
    H. D. Ju, and S. B. Lee, Transmission loss estimation of three dimensional silencers with perforated internal structures using multi-domain BEM.Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology. 19 (8) (2005) 1568–1575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    H. D. Ju, S. B. Lee, W. B. Jeong and B. H. Lee, Design of an acoustic enclosure with duct silencers for the heavy duty diesel engine generator set.Applied Acoustics. 65 (2004) 441–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    M. L. Munjal, Acoustics of Ducts and Mufflers, John Wiley & Sons, New York, (1987) 75–84.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    R. Ramakrishnan, Design curves for rectangular splitter silencers,Applied Acoustics, 35 (1992) 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    T. Tanaka and T. Fujikawa, A method for the analytical prediction of insertion loss of a twodimensional muffler model based on the transfer matrix derived from the boundary element method,Journal of Vibration, Acoustics, Stress and Reliability in Design. 107 (1985) 86–91.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    C. Y. R. Cheng and A. F. Seybert, A multidomain boundary element solution for silencer and muffler performance prediction,Journal of Sound and Vibration 151 (1) (1991) 119–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Z. Ji, Q. Ma and Z. Zhang, Application of the boundary element method to predicting acoustic performance of expansion chamber mufflers with mean flow,Journal of Sound and Vibration 173 (1) (1994) 57–71.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    H. D. Ju and S. B. Lee, Multi-domain structural-acoustic coupling analysis using the finite element and boundary element techniques,Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 15 (5) (2001) 555–561.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    T. W. Wu, P. Zhang and C. Y. R. Cheng, Boundary element analysis of mufflers with an improved method for deriving the four-pole parameters.Journal of Sound and Vibration 217 (4) (1998) 767–779.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    G. Lou and T. W. Wu, Impedance matrix synthesis for multiply connected exhaust network systems using the direct mixed-body BEM.Journal of Sound and Vibration. 238 (2) (2000) 351–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    G. Lou, T. W. Wu and C. Y. R. Cheng, Boundary element analysis of packed silencers with a substructuring technique,Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements. 27 (2003) 643–653.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    A. Selamet, I. J. Lee and N. T. Huff, Acoustic attenuation of hybrid silencers,Journal of Sound and Vibration. 262 (2003) 509–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Z. L. Ji, Boundary element analysis of a straight-through hybrid silencer,Journal of Sound and Vibration, 292 (2006) 415–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    H. R. Martens and D. R. Allen, Introduction to Systems Theory, Charles E. Merrill Publishing Co., Columbus, Ohio, (1969) 131–157.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    A. F. Seybert and F. Ross, Experimental determination of acoustic properties using a twomicrophone random excitation technique,Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 61 (1977) 1362–1370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    H. Utsuno, T. Tanaka, T. Fujikawa and A. F. Seybert, Transfer function method for measuring characteristic impedance and propagation constant of porous materials,Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 86 (1989) 637–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers (KSME) 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Fire & Disaster Prevention EngineeringJinju International UniversityChinjuKorea
  2. 2.School of Mechanical EngineeringPusan National UniversityPusanKorea
  3. 3.DK Industrial Co., Ltd., 1571-16Knock-san Industrial ComplexPusanKorea

Personalised recommendations