Carbonates and Evaporites

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 98–106 | Cite as

McCauley Sinks: A compound breccia pipe in evaporite karst, Holbrook basin, Arizona, U.S.A.

  • James T. Neal
  • Kenneth S. Johnson


The McCauley Sinks, in the Holbrook basin of northeastern Arizona, are comprised of some 50 individual sinkholes within a 3-km-wide depression. The sinks are grouped in a semi-concentric pattern of three nested rings. The outerring is an apparent tension zone containing ring fractures. The two innerrings are semi-circular chains of large sinkholes, ranging up to 100m across and 50m deep. Severalsub-basins within the larger depression show local downwarping and possible incipent sinkholes.

Permian Kaibab Formation limestone is the principal surface lithology; the limestone here is less than 15 m thick and is near its easternmost limit. Although surface rillenkarren are present, and the sinks are seen in the Kaibab limestone outcrops, the Kaibab is mainly a passive rock unit that has collapsed into solution cavities developed in underlying salt beds. Beneath the Kaibab is Coconino Sandstone, which overlies the Permian Schnebly Hill Formation, the unit containing the evaporite rocks—principally halite in the Corduroy Member. Evaporite kars in this part of the Holbrook basin is quite different from the eastern part, probably because of the westward disapearance of the Holbrook anticline, a structure that has major joint systems that help channel water down to the salt beds farther to the east. Also, the McCauley Sinks are near the western limits of the evaporites.

The structure at McCauley Sinks suggests a compound breccia pipe, with multiple sinks contributing to the inward-dipping major depression. The Richards Lake depression, 5 km southeast of McCauley Sinks, is similar in form and size but contains only a single, central sinkhole. An apparent difference in hydrogeology at McCauley Sinks is their proximity to the adjacent, deeply incised, Chevelon Canyon drainage, but the hydrologic connections are unknown.

The 3-km-wide McCauley Sinks karst depression, along with five other nearby depressions, provide substantial hydrologic catchment. Because of widespread piping into karst features and jointed bedrock at shallow depth, runoff water does not pond easily at the surface. There appears to be a greater recharge efficiency here than in alluvial areas; thus concern exists for groundwater users downgradient from the karst area. Accordingly, sinkholes and open fissures should not be used for waste disposal.


Breccia Evaporite Colorado Plateau Breccia Pipe Evaporite Rock 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. BACHMAN, G.O., 1984, Regional geology of Ochan evaporites, northern part of Delaware Basin: Socorro, NM:New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources Circular, v. 184, 24 p.Google Scholar
  2. BACHMAN, G.O., 1987, Karst in evaporites in southeastern New Mexico: Albuquerque, NM, Sandia National Laboratories Report SAND 87-7078, 82p.Google Scholar
  3. BAHR, C.W., 1962, The Holbrook Anticline, Navajo County, Arizona:in 13th New Mex. Geol. Soc. Guidebook, p. 118–122.Google Scholar
  4. BLAKEY, R.C., 1990. Stratigraphy and geologic history of Pennsylvanian and Permian rocks, Mogollon Rimregion, central Arizona and vicinity:Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 102, p. 1189–1217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. COLPITTS, R. and NEAL, J.T., 1996, Blue Mesa Sink, a possible solution depression in Petrified Forest National Park, Arizona:Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, v. 28, no. 7, Oct., 1996, p. A-392.Google Scholar
  6. DAVIES, P.B., 1984, Deep-seated dissolution and subsidence in bedded salt deposits. PhD Dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  7. DEMILLE, G., SHOULDICE, J.R., and NELSON, H.W., 1964, Collapse structures related to evaporites of the Prairie Formation, Saskatchewan, Canada:Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 74, no. 4, p. 307–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. HILL, C.A., 1996, Geology of the Delaware basin, Guadalupe, Apache, and Glass Mountains, New Mexico and West Texas. Permian Basin Section-SEPM, Publication 96-39, 480p.Google Scholar
  9. JOHNSON, K.S., 1981, Dissolution of salt on the east flank of the Permian basin in the southwestern USA:Journal of Hydrology, v. 54, p. 75–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. LAMBERT, S.J., 1983, Dissolution of evaporites in and around the Delaware Basin, southeastern New Mexico and West Texas: albuquerque, NM, Sandia National Laboratories Report SAND 82-0461, 96p.Google Scholar
  11. LINDBERG, P.A., 1998, Structural controls of Devils Kitchen sinkhole; Sedona, Arizona. 49th Highway Geology Symposium Proceedings, Prescott, AZ, 11–14 Sept. 1998.Google Scholar
  12. MANN, L.J., 1976, Ground-water resources and water use in southern Navajo County, Arizona:Arizona Water Comm. Bulletin, v. 10, Phoenix, AZ, 106p.Google Scholar
  13. MARTINEZ, J.D., JOHNSON, K.S., and NEAL, J.T., 1998, Sinkholes in evaporite rocks:American Scientist, v. 86, no. 1, p. 38–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. NEAL, J.T. and COLPITTS, R.M., 1997, Evaporite karst in the western part of the Holbrook Basin, ArizonaIn B.F. Beck and J.B. Stephenson, eds., The Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology of Karst Terranes. Balkema, Rotterdam, p. 107–115.Google Scholar
  15. NEAL, J.T. and COLPITTS, R.M., 1997. Richards Lake, an evaporitekarst depression in the Holbrook Basin, Arizona:Carbonates and Evaporites, v. 12, no. 1, p. 91–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. NEAL, J.T., COLPITTS, R., and JOHNSON, K.S., 1998, Evaporite karst in the Holbrook Basin, Arizona,in Borchers, J., ed., J.F. Poland Symposium on Land Subsidence: Sudbury, MA:Assoc. Eng. Geologists Spec. Pub., v. 8, p. 373–384.Google Scholar
  17. PEIRC, H.W. and GERRARD, T.A., 1966, Evaporite deposits of the Permian Holbrook Basin, Arizona,in Second Symposium on Salt, v. 1: Cleveland, Northern Ohio Geological Society, p. 1–10.Google Scholar
  18. RAMSEY, J.G., 1967, Folding and fracturing of rocks McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 568 p.Google Scholar
  19. SANFORD A.R., 1959, Analytical and experimental study of simple geologic structures:Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 70, p. 19–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. SUTPHIN, H.B. and WENRICH, K.J., 1988, Map showing structural control of breccia pipes on the southern Marble Plateau, northcentral Arizona: Washington, DC: U.S. Geological Survey Misc. Investigations Map I-778.Google Scholar
  21. WENRICH, K.J. and BILLINGSLEY, G.H., 1986, Breccia pipes in northern Arizona: Geological Society of America and University of Northern Arizona, Rocky Mountain Section Meeting Guidebook, p. 43–58.Google Scholar
  22. WILSON, E.D., MOORE, R.T., and O’HAIRE, R.T., 1960, Geologic map of Navajo and Apache Counties: Arizona Bur. Mines, Tucson, AZ.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • James T. Neal
    • 1
  • Kenneth S. Johnson
    • 2
  1. 1.Sharlot Hall MuseumPrescott
  2. 2.Oklahoma Geological SurveyNorman

Personalised recommendations