Advertisement

Carbonates and Evaporites

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 144–160 | Cite as

Characterization of the Antalya (Turkey) tufa deposits

  • Nihat DipovaEmail author
  • Vedat Doyuran
Article

Abstract

Carbonate rocks in Antalya (Turkey) which have previously been called travertine should, because of their biogenic origin and deposition in a cool-water regime, be termed tufa. Tufas in Antalya are the products of physico-chemical and biogenic precipitation. In the biogenic process, precipitation was caused by decreasing partial pressure of CO2 via photosynthesis of algae or bacteria. Following precipitation, the tufas underwent meteoric-vadose cementation and diagenesis. The Antalya tufa basin consists of horizontally-bedded carbonate sediments which are end products of a lacustrine depositional environment. However, a perched springline system has played an important role, serving as a starting point for calcium-carbonate precipitation. The morphology of tufa coastal cliffs is controlled by sea erosion. Thus, terraced morphology, except for small areas (e.g., Masadaği), should be considered a result of erosion. In this study, tufa deposits of Antalya were characterized with respect to mineralogy, sedimentology and surface morphology. In addition, for the future multidisciplinary needs (engineering and environmental) other aspects on tufa formation are discussed.

Keywords

Antalya characterization classification tufa travertine 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AKAY, E., UYSAL, Ş., POISSON, A., CRAVETTE, J., and MULLER, C., 1985, Antalya Neojen Havzasinin Stratigrafisi:Türkiye Jeoloji Kurumu Bülteni, v. 28, no. 2, p. 105–121.Google Scholar
  2. ALTUG, A., 1977, Karst hydrogeological report of the Antalya Kirkgöz springs and travertine Plateau. DSI, Ankara, Turkey.Google Scholar
  3. AYDAR, C. and DUMONT, J.F., 1979, Antalya Travertenlerinde Görülen Dizilimlerde Elde Edilen Landsat Görüntüleri Üzerinde Yapilan Gözlemler: Neotektonik ve Hidrojeoloji Arasinda Olabilecek Bağintilarin Tartişmasi:MAT Dergisi, v. 92, p. 131–134.Google Scholar
  4. BRAITHWAITE, C.J.R., 1979, Textures of Recent Fluvial Pisoids and Laminated Crystalline Crust in Dyfed, South Wales:Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 49, p. 181–193.Google Scholar
  5. BUCCINO, G., D’ARGENIO, B., FERRERI, V.M., PANICHI, C., and STANZIONE, D., 1978, I Travertini Della Bassa Valle del Tanagro (Campania) Studio Geomorphologia:Sedimentologia e Geochimico. Boll. Soc. Geol. It., v. 97, p. 617–646.Google Scholar
  6. BURGER, D., 1990, The Travertine Complex of Antalya/Southwest Turkey:Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie. Neue Forschung. Suppl.Bd. v. 77, p. 25–46.Google Scholar
  7. CHAFETZ, H.S. and FOLK, R.L., 1984, Travertines: Depositional Morphology and the Bacterially constructed constituents:Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 54, no. 1, p. 289–316.Google Scholar
  8. CHAFETZ, H.S., RUSH, P.F., and UTECH, N.M., 1991, Microenvironmental Controls on Mineralogy and Habit of CaCO3 Precipitates: An Example From an Active Travertine System:Sedimentology, v. 38, p. 107–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DIPOVA, N., 2002, Collapse mechanism of the Antalya tufa deposits. PhD. Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.Google Scholar
  10. DIPOVA, N., 2005, Tufa Üzerindeki Terra-Rosa Türü Zeminlerin Jeolojik ve Jeoteknik Özellikleri,11.Ulusal Kil Sempozyumu, Van, Türkiye, p. 476–484.Google Scholar
  11. DSİ, 1985, Antalya-Kirkgöz Kaynaklari ve Traverten Platosu Karst Hidrojeolojik Etüd Raporu, DSİ Teknik Hizmetler ve Yeralti Sulari Dairesi Başkanliği, Ankara.Google Scholar
  12. DUNHAM, R.J., 1962, Classification of Carbonate Rocks According to Depositional Texture, in W.E. Ham, ed., Classification of Carbonate Rocks. Mem:American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. I, p. 108–121.Google Scholar
  13. FOLK, R.L., 1959, Practical Petrographic Classification of Limestones:American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin. v. 43, p. 1–38.Google Scholar
  14. FOLK, R.L. and CHAFETZ, H.S., 1983, Pisoliths (pisoids) in Quaternary Travertines of Tivoli, Italy, in T.M. Peryt, ed.,Coated Grains., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, p. 475–487.Google Scholar
  15. FORD, T.D. and PEDLEY, H.M., 1996, A Review of Tufa and Travertine Deposits of the World:Earth Science Review, v. 41, p. 117–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. GLOVER, C.P. and ROBERTSON, A.H.F., 1998, Role of Regional Extension and Uplift in the Plio-Pleistocene Evolution of the Aksu Basin, SW Turkey:Journal of Geological Society London: v. 155, p. 365–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. GLOVER, C.P. and ROBERTSON, A.H.F., 2003, Origin of Tufa (Cool-Water Carbonate) and Related Terraces in the Antalya Area, SW Turkey:Geological Journal, v. 38, p. 329–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. GRIFFITHS, H. and PEDLEY, H.M., 1995, Did Changes in the Last Glacials and Early Holocene Atmospheric CO2 Control Rates of Tufa Precipitation?:The Holocene, v. 5, p. 238–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. GUO, L. and RIDING, R., 1994, Origin and Diagenesis of Quaternary Travertine Shrub Fabrics, Rapolano Terme, Central Italy:Sedimentology, v. 41, p. 499–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. LAND, L.S., MACKENZIE, F.T., and GOULD, S.J., 1967, Pleistocene History of Bermuda:Geological Society America Bulletin, v. 78, p. 993–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. LORAH, M.M. and HERMAN, J.S., 1988, The Chemical Evolution of a Travertine-Tepositing Stream: Ggeochemical Processes and Mass Transfer Reactions:Water Resources, v. 24, p. 1541–1552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. MARKER, M.E., 1971, Waterfall Tufas: A Facet of Karst Geomorphology in South Africa:Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie. Neue Forschung. Suppl. Bd., v. 12, p. 138–152.Google Scholar
  23. MERZ-PREIΒ, M. and RIDING, R., 1999, Cyanobacterial Tufa Calcification in Two Freshwater Streams: Ambient Environment, Chemical Thresholds and Biological Processes:Sedimentary Geology, v. 126, p. 103–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. NOSSIN, J.J., 1989, SPOT Stereo Interpretation in Karst Terrain, Southern Turkey:ITC Journal, v. 2, p. 79–91.Google Scholar
  25. ORDONEZ, S. and GARCIA DEL CURA, M.A., 1983, Tertiary Fluvial Carbonates in Central Spain. in J.D. Collision and J. Lewin, eds., Modern and Ancient Fluvial Systems. Special Pub. International Association of Sedimentologists, v. 6, p. 485–497.Google Scholar
  26. ÖZÜŞ, S., 1992, Antalya Travertines, hydrology and geochemistry. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey.Google Scholar
  27. PEDLEY, H.M., 1990, Classification and Environmental Models of Cool Freshwater Tufas:Sedimentary Geology, v. 68, p. 143–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. PENTECOST, A., 1994, Geochemistry of Carbon Dioxide in Six Travertine-Depositing Waters of Italy:Journal of Hydrology, v. 167, p. 263–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. PENTECOST, A., 1995, The Quaternary Travertine Deposits of Europe and Asia Minor:Quaternary Science Review, v. 14, p. 1005–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. PINGITORE, N.E., 1976, Vadose and Phreatic Diagenesis: Processes, Products and Their Recognition in Corals:Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 46, no. 4, p. 985–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. POISSON, A., 1977, Recherches Geologiques dans les Taurides Occidentales (Turquie): Orsay No. d’Ordre 1902, D.Sc. thesis, Universite de Paris-Sud (Centre d’Orsay).Google Scholar
  32. SCHOLZ, C.A., ROSENDAHL, B.R., and SCOTT, D.L., 1990, Development of Coarse Grained Facies in Lacustrine Rift Systems; Examples from East Africa:Geology, v. 18, p. 140–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. VILES, H.A., 1988, Biogeomorphology. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 365 p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringAkdeniz UniversityAntalyaTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Geological EngineeringMiddle East Technical UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations