Advertisement

Carbonates and Evaporites

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 140–149 | Cite as

Pedological nodules with cone in cone structure in the Permian of Sierra Morena (Spain) and Central Morocco

  • Habiba Aassoumi
  • Jean Broutin
  • Mohammed El Wartiti
  • Pierre Freytet
  • Jean-Claude Koeniguer
  • Cecilio Quesada
  • Fernando Simancas
  • Nadège Toutin-Morin
Article

Abstract

The occurrence of (1) calcite aureoled quartz, and (2) vertical cylindrical features (“rhizocretions” in literature), and subspherical or unevenly shaped nodules resulting from the coalescence of smaller elements (“nodular calcrete”) is reported in various Permian continental series from Western Europe (Sierra Morena, Spain) and North Africa (Central Meseta of Morocco). These features are developed in flood plain pelites (mudstones) interbedded with gravelly channel material and debris flow deposits. These nodules are interpreted as pedological concretions formed in hydromorphic soils under tropical climatic conditions with contrasting seasons and not under desertic environments.

These nodules show the close association of a classical micritic/microsparitic internal sediment with areas where cone in cone structures prevail. The distribution of facies suggests an early pedogenic origin. At this early stage, vegetal roots were alive (probably Cordaitales) and were encrusted by the redistribution of calcitic components in the soil profile resulting from oscillations of the water table. The cone-in-cone structure probably resulted from bacterial activity.

Keywords

Calcite Travertine Micrite Debris Flow Deposit Hydromorphic Soil 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aso Samper, E. J., 1991,Origen de septarias y cone in cone”, condiciones geologicas y reproduccion experimental, Doct. tesis, Universitad de Zaragoza: 243 p.Google Scholar
  2. Aso Samper, E., Gisbert Aguilar, J., and Valero Garces, B., 1992, Type septaria-cone-in-cone nodules in the Stephaniense-Permian of the Catalan Pyrenees: ????Google Scholar
  3. Bonte, A., 1942, Sur l’origine sédimentaire de la structure cone in cone:Comptes Rendus Acad. Sciences, Paris, v. 214, p. 498–500.Google Scholar
  4. Braithwaite, C. J. R., 1989, Displacive calcite and grain breakage in sandstones:J. Sed. Petrol., v. 59, 2, p. 258–266.Google Scholar
  5. Brewer, R., 1964,Fabric and mineral analysis of soils, J. Wiley, New York, 470 p.Google Scholar
  6. Broutin, J., 1986,Etude paléobotanique et palynologique du passage Carbonifère-Permien dans le Sud Ouest de la péninsule ibérique, Cahiers de Paléontologie. C.N.R.S., Paris, 160 p. 30 pl.Google Scholar
  7. Broutin, J., El Wartiti, M., Freytet, P., Heyler, D., Larhrib, M., andMorel, JL., 1987, Nouvelles découvertes paléontologiques dans le bassin détritique carbonaté de Tiddas (Maroc central):Comptes Rendus Acad. Sciences, Paris, v. 305, II, p. 143–148.Google Scholar
  8. Buurman, P., 1972, Mineralization of fossil wood:Scripta geologica, Rijksmuseum van Geol. en Miner., Leiden, v. 12, 43 p.Google Scholar
  9. Callot, G., Mousain, D., andPlassard, C., 1985, Concentration de carbonate de calcium sur les parois des hyphes mycéliens:Agronomie, v. 5, p. 143–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Callot, G., Guyon, A., andMousain, D., 1985, Interrelations entre aiguilles de calcite et hyphes mycéliens:Agronomie, v. 5, p. 209–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Calvet, F., Pomar, L., andEsteban, M., 1975, Los rizocreciones del Pleistoceno de Mallorca:Inst. Invest. Geol. Univ. Barcelona, v. 30, p. 35–60.Google Scholar
  12. Castanier, S., Maurin A., andPerthuisot, J. P., 1989, Production bactérienne expérimentale de corpuscules carbonatés sphéroidaux à structure fibro-radiaire, reflexions sur la définition des ooides:Bull. Soc. géol. France, s. V, v. 3, p. 589–595.Google Scholar
  13. Chafetz, H. S., Wilkinson, B. H., and Love, K. M., 1985, Morphology and composition of non marine carbonate cements in near-surface settings:S.E.P.M. Sp. Publ. no 36, p. 337–347.Google Scholar
  14. Chanda, S. K., 1967, Selective neomorphism and fabric discontinuities in limestones:J. Sed. Petrol., v. 37, 3, p. 688–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cridland, A. A., 1964,Amyelon in American coal balls:Palaeontology, v. 7, p. 186–209.Google Scholar
  16. Denaeyer, M. E., 1939, La reproduction expérimentale de la structure cone in cone. Ses conséquences au point de vue de la tectonique:C. R. Acad. Sc. Paris, v. 208, p. 2004–2006.Google Scholar
  17. Denaeyer, M. E., 1945, Essai d’une théorie mécanique de la structure cone in cone:Bull. Soc. géol. France, s. 5, v. 15, p. 141–161.Google Scholar
  18. El Wartiti, M., Broutin, J., andFreytet, P., 1986, Premières découvertes paléontologiques dans les séries rouges carbonatées permiennes du bassin de Tiddas (Maroc central):Comptes Rendus Acad. Sciences, Paris, v. 203, II, p. 263–268.Google Scholar
  19. El Wartiti, M., Broutin, J., Freytet, P., Larhrib, M., andToutin-Morin, N., 1990, Continental deposits in Permian Basins of the Mesetian Morocco, geodynamic history:J. African Earth Sc., Pergamon Press, v. 10, 1–2, p. 361–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Folk, R. L., Chafetz, H. S., and Tiezzi, P. A. 1985, Bizzare forms of depositional and diagenetic calcite in hot-spring travertines, Central Italy:S.E.P.M. sp. publ., no 36, p. 349–369.Google Scholar
  21. Franks, P. C., 1969, Nature, origin, and significance of cone-in-cone structures in the Kiowa Formation (Early Cretaceous), North-Central Kansas:J. Sedim. Petrol., v. 39, 4, p. 1438–1454.Google Scholar
  22. Freytet, P., 1964, Le Vitrollien des Corbières orientales: réflexions sur la sédimentation “lacustre” nord-pyrénéenne; divagation fluviatile, biorhexistasie, pédogénèse:Rev. Géogr. Phys. Géol. Dynam., s. 2, v. 6: 179–199.Google Scholar
  23. Freytet, P., 1971, Paléosols résiduels et paléosols alluviaux hydromorphes dans le Crétacé supérieur et l’Eocène basal en Languedoc:Rev. Géogr. Phys. Géol. Dynam., s. 2, v. 13, p. 245–268.Google Scholar
  24. Freytet, P., 1973, Petrography and paleoenvironment of continental carbonate deposits with a particular reference to Upper Cretaceous and Lower Eocene of Languedoc, Southern France:Sedim. Geol., v. 10, p. 25–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Freytet, P., 1984, Les sédiments lacustres carbonatés et leur transformation par émersion et pédogénèse. Importance de leur identification pour les reconstitutions paléogéographiques:Bull. Centre Rech. Expl.-Produc. ELF-Aquitaine, v. 8, 1, p. 223–247.Google Scholar
  26. Freytet, P., Lebreton, M. L., and Paquette, Y., 1992, The carbonates of the Permian lakes from the North Massif Central, France.Google Scholar
  27. Freytet, P., andPlaziat, J-C., 1982,Continental carbonate sedimentation and pedogenesis—Late Cretaceous and Early Tertiary of Southern France, Schweizerbart’sche Verlag, Stuttgart, 213 p., 49 pl., photo.Google Scholar
  28. Galbadon, V., andQuesada, C., 1986, Exemples de bassins houillers limniques du sud-ouest de la Péninsule ibérique: évolution sédimentaire et contrôle structural:Mém. Soc. géol. France, n.s., v. 149, p. 29–38.Google Scholar
  29. Gile, L. H., Peterson, F. F., andGrosman, R. B., 1965, The K-horizon, a master soil horizon of carbonate accumulation:Soil Sci., v. 99, p. 74–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Goudie, A. S., 1984, Calcrete,in A. S. Goudie and K. Pye, eds.,Chemical sediments and geomorphology: Acad. Press, London, p. 93–131.Google Scholar
  31. Gresley, W. S., 1894, Cone in cone: how it occurs in the “Devonian” series in Pennsylvania, U.S.A., with further details of its structure:Quart. J. Geol. Soc., v. 50, p. 731–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harris, P. M., Kendall, C. G. St C., and Lerche, I., 1985, Carbonate cementation—a brief review:S.E.P.M. Sp. Publ. no 36, p. 79–95.Google Scholar
  33. Jaillard, B., 1987, Les structures rhizomorphes calcaires: modèle de réorganisation des minéraux du sol par les racines:Mém. Inst. Nat. Rech. Agronom. Montpellier, 227 p.Google Scholar
  34. Kendall, A. C., 1985, Radiaxial fibrous calcite: a reappraisal:Carbonate cements, S.E.P.M. Sp. Publ. no 36, p. 59–77.Google Scholar
  35. Klappa, C. F., 1980, Rhizoliths in terrestrial carbonates: classification, recognition, genesis and significance:Sedimentology, v. 27, p. 613–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lotze, F., 1945, Zur Gliederung des Varisciden der ibericher Meseta:Geoteck. Forsch., v. 6, p. 78–92.Google Scholar
  37. Marshall, J. D., 1982, Isotopic composition of displacive fibrous calcite veins: reversals in pore-water composition trends during burial diagenesis:J. Sed. Petrol., v. 52, 2, p. 615–630.Google Scholar
  38. Munha, J., Oliveira, J. T., Ribeiro, A., Oliveira, V., Quesada, C., andKerrich, R., 1986, Beja-Acebuches ophiolite: characterization and geodynamic significance:Maleo, s. 2, v. 13, p. 1–31.Google Scholar
  39. Purvis, K., andWright, V. P., 1991, Calcretes related to phreatophitic vegetation from the Middle Triassic Otter Sandstone of South West England:Sedimentology, v. 38, p. 539–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Quesada, C., 1991, Geological constraints on the Paleozoic tectonic evolution of tectonostratigraphic terranes in the Iberian Massif:Tectonophysics, v. 185, p. 225–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Quesada, C., and Garrote, A., 1983, Carboniferous geology of the Sierra Morena,Xth I.C.C., Field trip D Guidebook, 104 p.Google Scholar
  42. Reeves, C. C., 1976,Caliche, origin, classification, morphology and uses, Estacado Books, Texas, 233 p.Google Scholar
  43. Retallack, G. J., 1986, The fossil record of soils:in V. P. Wright, ed.,Paleosols, their recognition and interpretation, Blackwell, Oxford, 1–57.Google Scholar
  44. Retallack, G. J., 1988, Field recognition of paleosols:in J. Reinhardt and W. R. Sigleo, ed., Paleosols and weathering through geologic time: principles and applications,U.S. Geol. Survey, Sp. Paper 216, p. 1–20.Google Scholar
  45. Retallack, G. J., 1990,Soils of the past, an introduction to paleopedology, Unwin Hyman, Boston, 520 p.Google Scholar
  46. Simancas, F., 1983,Geologia de la extremidad oriental de la zone sudportuguesa, Thesis Univ. Granada, 418 p.Google Scholar
  47. Tarr, W. A., 1932, Cone in cone:in W. H. Twenhoffel,Treatise on sedimentation, London, p. 716–733.Google Scholar
  48. Toutin-Morin, N., 1992, The Permian carbonates in Provence (Southeastern France).Google Scholar
  49. Verrecchia, E., Ribier, J., Freytet, P., Patillon, M., andRolko, K., 1991, Une origine biologique pour certaines croûtes zonaires: contribution des Cyanophycées à leur édification:Comptes Rendus Acad. Sciences, Paris, v. 313, II, 1619–1625.Google Scholar
  50. Vozenin-Serra, C., Broutin, J., andToutin-Morin, N., 1991, Bois permiens du sud-ouest de l’Espagne et du sud-est de la France, implications pour la taxonomie des Gymnospermes paléozoiques et la phylogénie des Ginkgophytes:Palaeontographica, B, v. 221, 1–4, p. 1–26.Google Scholar
  51. Woodland, B. C., 1964, The nature and origin of cone in cone structure:Chicago Nat. Hist. Mus. Fieldiana, Geol. v. 13, p. 187–305.Google Scholar
  52. Wright, V. P., 1986, The role of fungal biomineralization in the formation of Early Carboniferous soil fabrics:Sedimentology, v. 33, p. 831–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zouine, El. M., 1986,Evolution tardi hercynienne de la bordure septentrionale du Maroc central entre Tiddas et Jebel Triona, Thèse 3ème cycle E.N.S. du Souissi, Rabat, 122 p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Habiba Aassoumi
    • 1
  • Jean Broutin
    • 1
  • Mohammed El Wartiti
    • 2
  • Pierre Freytet
    • 3
  • Jean-Claude Koeniguer
    • 4
  • Cecilio Quesada
    • 5
  • Fernando Simancas
    • 6
  • Nadège Toutin-Morin
    • 7
  1. 1.Lab. Paléobotanique et PalynologieUniv. Paris VIParisFrance
  2. 2.Dept. Sciences de la TerreUniversité Mohammed VRabatMaroc
  3. 3.Lab. Pétrologie Sedimentaire et PaléontologieUniversité Paris-SudOrsayFrance
  4. 4.Lab. Paléobotanique et PalynologieUniv. Paris VIFrance
  5. 5.I.T.G.E.MadridSpain
  6. 6.Facultad de Ciencias Departamento de Geotectonica y GeomorphologiaUniversidad de GranadaSpain
  7. 7.Lab. Géologie Structurale URA 1366 Dpt. Sciences de la TerreUniv. OrléansOrléans Cédex 2France

Personalised recommendations