Advertisement

Carbonates and Evaporites

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 72–81 | Cite as

Diagenesis of the Middle Eocene Upper Dammam Subformation, Qatar: Petrographic and isotopic evidence

  • Hanafy M. Holail
  • Mohamad N. Shaaban
  • A. S. Mansour
  • Rifai I. Rifai
Article

Abstract

The subsurface Middle Eocene Upper Dammam Subformation in Qatar displays a complex diagenetic history related to sea level variations. The studied rocks are made up of dolomitic limestones and pervasive dolomites. Two main types of dolomite are identified based on an integrated petrographic/isotopic/mineralogic study: dolomites type (I) and (II), which affect the lower (the Umm Bab member) and the upper (the Abaruq member) parts of the Upper Dammam Subformation respectively. Dolomite type (I) is pervasive and composed of relatively coarse crystals that exhibit polymodal size distribution and different shapes of crystal boundaries (non-planar, planar-s and planar-e). Meanwhile, dolomite type (II) is selective, fine-textured and made up of unimodal equant euhedral rhombs.

The marine δ18O (+0.6 to +2.8‰) values of dolomite type (I) are consistent with formation during an early transgressive phase where the rising sea level possibly caused marine pore-water to push mixing and meteoric waters ahead of it. The active circulation in the marine pore-water zone led to pervasive dolomitization. The depleted δ13C (−5.9 to −8.9‰ PDB) values of dolomite type (I) indicate that dolomitization possibly occurred within the sulphate reduction zone beneath the sediment/water interface when an oxygen-minimum zone impinged the bottom surface of the carbonate platform. The presence of mimetic and non-mimetic dolomite textures is related to kinetic factors including the rate of dissolution of the CaCO3 precursor, reactant surface area and precipitation kinetics. Dolomite type (II) was formed during a subsequent highstand period during shelf progradation. The δ18O (+0.4 to +2.6‰ PDB) and δ13C (−0.9 to −4.6‰ PDB) values, the fine crystalline fabric and the planar intercrystalline boundaries argue for its early diagenetic origin within the subtidal zone above the oxygen-minimum zone.

During further shelf progradation the studied rocks have been emplaced within a mixing marine-meteoric zone. During this period the dolomitization process was interrupted by a silicification phase. The precipitation of quartz and the resultant silica fabrics are controlled by variations in the PCO2 and the pH of the porewater. At the later stages of the highstand system tract, when sea level started to fall, a meteoric lens possibly developed at the shelf margin. The section was subjected to meteoric diagenesis. A late meteoric origin is suggested for calcite mosaics, that fill some secondary pores, based on their extremely depleted δ18O values (−5.7 to −11.8‰), variable δ13C values (−2.6 to −7.8‰ PDB), low-Mg composition and their equant form.

Keywords

Dolomite Dolomitization Ooids Middle Eocene Qatar 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ABU ZEID, M., 1991, Lithostratigraphy and framework of sedimentation of the subsurface Paleogene succession in northern Qatar, Arabian Gulf:Neue Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paleaontologie, v. 12, p. 191–204.Google Scholar
  2. ABU ZEID, M. and BOUKHARY, M., 1984, Stratigraphy, facies and environment of sedimentation of the Eocene rocks in the Fahaihil (Gebel Dukhan), Qatar, Arabian Gulf:Review of Paleobiology, v. 3, p. 159–173.Google Scholar
  3. BAKER, P.A. and KASTNER, M., 1981, Constraints on the formation of sedimentary dolomite:Science, v. 213, p. 214–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. BANNER, J.L., HANSON, G.N., and MEYERS, W.J., 1988, Water-rock interaction history of regionally extensive dolomites of the Burlington-Keokuk Formation (Mississipian): Isotopic evidence,in V. Shukla and P.A. Baker, eds., Sedimentology and Geochemistry of Dolostones: Special Publication of the Society for Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, v. 43, p. 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. BRAITHWAITE, R., 1991, Dolomites, a review of origins, geometry and textures:Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, v. 82, p. 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. BULLEN, S.B. and SIBLEY, D.F., 1984, Dolomite selectivity and mimic replacement:Geology, v. 12, p. 655–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. CAVELIER, C., 1970, Geologic deposition of the Qatar Peninsula (Arabian Gulf):Publication of the Government of Qatar, Department of Petroleun Affairs, 39 p.Google Scholar
  8. FRIEDMAN, G.M., 1959, Identification of carbonate minerals by staining methods:Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 29, p. 87–97.Google Scholar
  9. FRIEDMAN, G.M., 1980, Dolomite is an evaporite mineral: evidence from the rock record and from sea-marginal ponds of the Red Sea,in D.H. Zenger, J.B. Dunham, and R.L. Ethington, eds., Concepts and Models of Dolomitization, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists (SEPM) Special Publication, v. 28, p. 69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. FRIEDMAN, G.M., 1995, Diverse origin of modern dolomite in the Levant:Carbonates and Evaporites, v. 10, p. 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. FRIEDMAN, G.M. and SANDERS, J.E., 1967, Origin and occurrence of dolostones:in G.V. Chilinger, H.J. Bissell, and R.W. Fairbridge, eds., Carbonate Rocks. Elsevier Publishing Co., p. 267–348.Google Scholar
  12. GOLDSMITH, J.R. and GRAF, D.L., 1958, Structural and compositional variations in some natural dolomites:Journal of Geology, v. 66, p. 84–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. GREGG, J.M. and SHELTON, K.L., 1990, Dolomitization and dolomite neomorphism in the back reef facies of the Bonneterre and Davies formations (Cambrian), southeastern Missouri:Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 60, p. 549–562.Google Scholar
  14. HAQ, B.U., HARDENBOL, J. and VAIL, P.R., 1987, Chronology of fluctuating sea-levels since the Triassic:Science, v. 235, p. 1156–1167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. HARDIE, L.A., 1987, Dolomitization- a critical review of some current views:Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 57, p. 166–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. HESSE, R., 1989, Silica diagenesis: Origin of inorganic and replacement cherts:Earth Science Reviews, v. 26, p. 253–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. HEWAIDY, A. and AL-SAAD, H., 1993, Surface Eocene stratigraphy of Qatar Peninsula:Al-Azhar Bulletin of Science, v. 4, p. 165–193.Google Scholar
  18. HOLAIL, H.M., 1994a, Carbon and oxygen ratios of the Middle Eocene dolomite, Gebel Ataqa, Egypt:Neue Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paleaontologie, v. 191, 111–124.Google Scholar
  19. HOLAIL, H.M., 1994b, Diagenesis of the Middle Eocene ‘Nummulitic bank” of the Giza Pyramids Plateau, Egypt: Petrographic and18O/16O evidence:Qatar University of Science Journal, v. 14, p. 146–152.Google Scholar
  20. JACKA, A.D., 1974, Replacement of fossils by length-slow chalcedony and associated dolomitization:Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 44, p. 421–427.Google Scholar
  21. JAMES, N.P. and CHOQUETTE, P.W., 1984, Diagenesis 9- Limestones- The meteoric diagenetic environment:Geoscience Canada, v. 11, p. 161–194.Google Scholar
  22. KNAUTH, L.P., 1979, A model for the origin of chert in limestone:Geology, v. 7, p. 274–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. KNAUTH, L.P., 1994, Petrogenesis of chert,in P.J. Heaney, et al., eds., Reviews in Mineralogy. Mineralogical Society of America, v. 29, p. 233–258.Google Scholar
  24. MACHEL, H.G. and MOUNTJOY, E.W., 1986, Chemistry and environments of dolomitization- A reappraisal:Earth Science Reviews, v. 23, p. 175–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. PURSER, B.H., TUCKER, M.E., and ZENGER, D.H., 1994, Problems, progress and future research concerning dolomites and dolomitization: Special Publication of the International Association of Sedimentology, v. 21, p. 3–20.Google Scholar
  26. SALLER, A.H., 1984, Petrologic and geochemical constraints on the origin of subsurface dolomite, Enewetak Atoll: An example of dolomitization by normal seawater:Geology, v. 12, p. 217–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. SHAABAN, M.N. 1992, Selected geochemical factors influencing depositional environment and diagenesis of upper Cretaceous rocks of some localities in the Eastern Desert, Egypt. Ph.D. Thesis, Alexandria University, 268 p.Google Scholar
  28. SHAABAN, M.N., 1997, Stable isotope stratigraphy across the K/T boundary and isotopic investigations of an “ignored” worm bed, Eastern Desert, Egypt:Facies, v. 37, p. 137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. SHAABAN, M.N., 2004, Diagenesis of the Lower Eocene Thebes Formation, Gebel Rewagen Area, Eastern Desert, Egypt:Sedimentary Geology, (In press).Google Scholar
  30. SHAABAN, M.N., Holail, H.M. and Rashed, M.A., 1997, Dolomitization of Middle Miocene buildups, Um Gheig area, Red Sea coast, Egypt:Carbonates and Evaporites, v. 12, p. 264–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. SIBLEY, D.F. and GREGG, J.M., 1987, Classification of dolomite rock textures:Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 57, p. 955–963.Google Scholar
  32. SIBLEY, D.F., NORDENG, S.H., and BORKOWSKI, M.L., 1994, Dolomitization kinetics in hydrothermal bombs and natural settings:Journal of Sedimentary Research, v. A64, p. 630–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. SUN, S.Q., 1994, Prespective- a re-appraisal of dolomite abundance and occurrence in the Phanerozoic:Journal of Sedimentary Research, v. A64, p. 396–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. TUCKER, M.E., 1995, Carbonate diagenesis and sequence stratigraphy:in V.P. Wright, ed., Sedimentary Review, v. 1, p. 51–72, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  35. WALTER, L.M., 1986, Relative efficiency of carbonate dissolution and precipitation during diagenesis: A progress report on the role of solution chemistry:Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 56, p. 1–11.Google Scholar
  36. WARREN, J., 2000, Dolomite, occurrence, evolution and economically important associations:Earth Science Reviews, v. 52, p. 1–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hanafy M. Holail
    • 1
  • Mohamad N. Shaaban
    • 1
  • A. S. Mansour
    • 1
  • Rifai I. Rifai
    • 2
  1. 1.Geology Department, Faculty of ScienceAlexandria UniversityAlexandriaEgypt
  2. 2.Institute of Desert Environmental ResearchesMinufiya UniversityEgypt

Personalised recommendations