Carbonates and Evaporites

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 3–9 | Cite as

Where's the reef: The role of framework in the Holocene

  • Dennis K. Hubbard
  • Randolph B. Burke
  • Ivan P. Gill


Holocene reef models generally emphasize the role of in-place and interlocking framework in the creation of a rigid structure that rises above its surroundings. By extension, a number of ancient biohermal deposits have been disqualified as “true reefs” owing to their lack of recognizable framework. Fifty-four cores from several eastern Caribbean sites (Fig. 1) clearly demonstrate that in-place and interlocking framework is not common in these reefs that are comprised of varying mixtures of recognizable coral (primary framework), loose sediment/rubble and secondary framework made up mostly of coralgal fragments bound together by submarine cementation and biological encrustation. Recovery of primary and secondary framework ranged from 22% (avg.) in branching-coral facies to 33% in intervals dominated by head corals. Accretion rate decreased as expected with water depth. However, the recovery of recognizable coral generally increased with water depth, inversely to presumed coral-growth rates.

This pattern reflects a spectrum in the relative importance of coral growth (primary construction), bioerosion, hydromechanical breakdown and the transport of sediment and detritus. The relative importance of each is controlled by the physical-oceanographic conditions at the site of reef development and will dictate both the architecture of the reef and the character of its internal fabric. We do not propose that framework reefs do no exist, as they most assuredly do. However, the fact that so many modern reefs are not dominated by in-place and interlocking framework suggests that its use as the primary determinant of ancient reefs may be unreasonable. We, therefore, propose the abnndonment of framework-based models in favor of those that treat framework generation, physical/biological degradation, sedimentation, and encrustation as equal partners in the development of modern and ancient reefs alike.


Stromatolite Accretion Rate Fore Reef Drill String Reef Crest 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. AMERICANGEOLOGICAL IINSTITUTE, 1973, AGI Glossary of Geology. American Geological Institute, Washington, D.C., 850p.Google Scholar
  2. ADEY, W.H., 1978, Coral reef morphogenesis: a multidimensional model:Science, v. 202, p. 831–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ADEY, W.H. and BURKE, R.B., 1976, Holocene biochems (algal ridges and bank-barnier reefs) of the eastern Caribbean:Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 87, p. 95–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ADEY, W.H. and BURKE, R.B., 1977, Holocene biochems of Lesser Antilles-geologic control of development.In Frost, S.H., Weiss, M.P., and Saunders, J., ed., Reefs and Related Carbonates-Ecology and Sedimentology:American Association of Petroleum Geologists Studies in Geology, v. 4, p. 67–81.Google Scholar
  5. BURKE, R.B., ADEY, W.H., and MACINTYRE, I.G., 1989, Overview of the Holocene history, architecture and structural, components of Tague reef and lagoon.In Hubbard, D.K., ed., Terrestrial and Marine Geology of St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands: Special Publication No. 8, West Indies Laboratory, p. 105–110.Google Scholar
  6. DAVIES, P.J. and HOPLEY, D., 1983, Growth facies and growth rates of Holocene reefs in the Great Barrier Reef:BMR Journal of Australian Geology and Geophysics, v. 8, p. 237–252.Google Scholar
  7. FAGERSTROM, J.A., 1987, The Evolution of Reef communities. John Wiley & Sons, 600p.Google Scholar
  8. GEISTER, J., 1977, The influence of wave exposure on the ecology and zonation of Caribbean coral reefs: Proceedings of the Third International Coral Reef Symposium, v. 1, p. 23–29.Google Scholar
  9. GERHARD, L.C., 1991, Reef modeling: progress in simulation of carbonate environments.In Franceen, E.K., Watney, W.L., Kendall, CGSC., and Ross, W., eds., Sedimentary Modeling: Computer Simulation and Methods for Improved Parameter Definition:Kansas Geological Survey Bulletin, v. 233, p. 345–358.Google Scholar
  10. GERHARD, L.C. and BURKE, R., 1990, Reefs, banks, and biochems: a genetic and semantic continuum:Kansas Geological Survey Open File Report 90-11, 22p.Google Scholar
  11. Heckel, P.H., 1974, Carbonate buildups in the geologic recordin LaPorte, L.F., ed., Reefs in time and space: SEPM Special Publication, v. 18, p. 90–154.Google Scholar
  12. HUBBARD, D.K., 1989, Modern carbonate environments of St. Croix and the Caribbean: a general overview.In Hubbard, D.K., ed., Terrestrial and marine geology of St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands Special Publication No. 8, West Indies Laboratory, p. 85–94.Google Scholar
  13. HUBBARD, D.K., 1993, Hurricane-induced sediment transport in open-shelf tropical systems — an example from St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands:Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 62, p. 946–960.Google Scholar
  14. HUBBARD, D.K., MILLER, A.I., and SCATURO, D., (1990), Production and cycling of calcium carbonate in a shelf-edge reef system (St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands): applications to the nature of reef systems in the fossil record:Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 60, p. 335–360.Google Scholar
  15. LAND, L.S., 1979, The fate of reef-derived sediment on the north Jamaican island slope:Marine Geology, v. 29, p. 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. LIGHTY, R.G., MACINTYRE, I.G., and STUCKENRATH, R., 1982,Acropora palmata reef framework: a reliable indicator of sealevel in the western Atlantic for the past 10,000 years:Coral Reefs, v. 1, p. 125–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. LOWENSTAM, H.A., 1950, Niagaran reefs of the Great Lakes area:Geological Society of America Memoirs, v. 67, p. 215–248.Google Scholar
  18. MACINTYRE, I.G., 1978, A hand-operated submersible drill for coring reef substrata.In Stoddart, D.R. and Johannes, R., eds., Coral Reefs: Research Methods, UNESCO Monograph on Oceanographic Methodology, p. 75–80.Google Scholar
  19. MACINTYRE, I.G. and GLYNN, P.W., 1976, Evolution of a modem Caribbean fringing reef, Galeta Point, Panama:AAPG Bulletin, v. 60, p. 1054–1072.Google Scholar
  20. NATIONAL CLIMATIC CENTER, 1981, Tropical cyclones on the North Atlantic Ocean, 1871–1980 (with annual updates). National Climatic Center, Ashville, NC, 174 p., plus addenda.Google Scholar
  21. NEWELL, N.D., 1971, An outline history of tropical organic reefs: American Museum Novitates, New York Museum of Natural History, 37 p.Google Scholar
  22. NEWELL, N.E., EET AL., 1953, The Permian reef complex of the Guadalupe mountains region, Texas, and New Mexico, W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, 236 p.Google Scholar
  23. WILSON, J.L., 1975, Carbonate facies in geologic time. Springer-Verlag, New York, 471 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Northeasten Science Foundation, Inc 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dennis K. Hubbard
    • 1
  • Randolph B. Burke
    • 2
  • Ivan P. Gill
    • 3
  1. 1.VI Marine Advisors, Inc.St. CroixUSA
  2. 2.North Dakota Geological SurveyBismarckUSA
  3. 3.Department of GeologyUniversity of Puerto RicoMayaguezUSA

Personalised recommendations