Advertisement

Carbonates and Evaporites

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 163–169 | Cite as

Intergranular pressure dissolution in a Plio-Pleistocene grainstone buried no more than 30 meters: Shoofly oolite, Southwestern Idaho

  • L. Bruce Railsback
Article

Abstract

Intergranular pressure dissolution has occurred in the shallowly buried Plio-Pleistocene Shoofly oolite of the Glenns Ferry Formation in southwestem Idaho. The Shoofly lies at the margin of a lake basin and was buried to depths of 30 m or less beneath lake sediments and gravels derived from nearby volcanic rocks. Flattened, concavo-convex, and sutured contacts between ooids are common and make up over half of all intergranular contacts in the uncemented Shoofly grainstones, whereas such contants are much rarer in uncompacted oolitic grainstones. Sutured contacts make up about 7% of all intergranular contacts in the Shoofly oolite and provide clear evidence of intergranular pressure dissolution.

This pressure dissolution took place in 1/8 the time and at about 1/4 the burial depth of the youngest and most shallowly buried example of pressure dissolution previously reported. Pressure dissolution is commonly considered a burial diagenetic process, but sutured contacts in the Shoofly demonstrate that intergranular pressure dissolution in uncemented grainstones requires neither the depths, temperatures, nor time typically ascribed to burial diagenesis. Instead, fluid circulation, rather than burial, may have been important in driving Shoofly pressure dissolution.

Keywords

Burial Grainstones Ooids Burial Depth Pennsylvanian 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. BATHURST, R.G.C., 1980, Deep crustal diagenesis in limestones: Revista del Instituto de Investigaciones Geologicas, Deputacion Provincial, Universidad Barcelona, v. 34, p. 89–100.Google Scholar
  2. BATHURST, R. G. C., 1987, Diagenetically enhanced bedding in argillaceous platform limestones: stratified cementation and selective compaction;Sedimentology, v. 34, p. 749–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. BOND, J.G., 1978, Geologic Map of Idaho: Idaho Department of Lands, Bureau of Mines and Geology, scale 1:500,000.Google Scholar
  4. BUXTON, T.M., AND SIBLEY, D.F., 1981, Pressure solution features in a shallow buried limestone:Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 51, p. 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. COPE, E.D., 1883, On the fishes of the Recent and Pliocene lakes of the western part of the Great Basin, and of the Idaho Pliocene lake:Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, v. 35, p. 134–167.Google Scholar
  6. DEBOER, R.B., 1977, On the thermodynamics of pressure solution-Interaction between chemical and mechanical forces:Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 41, p. 249–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DUNNINGTON, H.V., 1967, Aspects of diagenesis and shape change in stylolitic limestone reservoirs: World Petroleum Congress, 7th, Mexico, Proc. v. 2, p. 339–352.Google Scholar
  8. DURNEY, D.W., 1972, Solution-transfer, an important geological deformation mechanism:Nature, v. 235, p. 315–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. EKREN, E.B., MCINTYRE, D.H., BENNETT, E.H., and MALDE, H.E., 1981, Geologic map of Owyhee County, Idaho, west of longitude 116W: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Geologic Investigation Map 1-1256, scale 1:125,000.Google Scholar
  10. ENGELDER, T., 1984, The role of pore-water circulation during the deformation of foreland fold and thrust belts:Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 89(B), p. 4319–4325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. FINKEL, E.A. AND WILKINSON, B.H., 1990, Stylolitization as source of cement in Mississippian Salem Limestone, west central Indiana:American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 74, p. 174–186.Google Scholar
  12. FRIEDMAN, G.M., 1975, The making and unmaking of limestones or the downs and ups of porosity:Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 45, p. 379–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. GEISER, P.A., AND SANSONE, S., 1981, Joints, microfractures, and the formation of solution cleavage in limestone:Geology, v. 9, p. 280–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. HIRD, K., AND TUCKER, M.E., 1988, Contrasting diagenesis of two carboniferous oolites from South Wales: a tale of climatic difference:Sedimentology, v. 35, p. 587–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. JAMES, N.P. & BONE, Y., 1989, Petrogenesis of Cenozoic, temperate water calcarenites, South Australia: A model for meteoric/shallow burial diagenesis of shallow water calcite sediments:Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 59, p. 191–203.Google Scholar
  16. MALDE, H.E., AND POWERS, H.A., 1962, Upper Cenozoic stratigraphy of western Snake River Plain, Idaho:Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 73, p. 1197–1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. MEYERS, W.J., AND HILL, B.E., 1983, Quantitatve studies of compaction in Mississippian skeletal limestones, New Mexico:Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 53, p. 231–242.Google Scholar
  18. PALMER, A.R., 1983, The decade of North American geology 1983 time scale:Geology, v. 11, p. 503–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. PURSER, B.H., 1978, Early diagenesis and the preservation of porosity in Jurassic limestones:Journal of Petroleum Geology, v. 1, p. 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. RAILSBACK, L.B., 1993, Contrasting styles of chemical compaction in the Upper Pennsylvanian Dennis Limestone in the Mid-Continent region, U.S.A.,Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 63, p. 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. ROBIN, P.-Y.F., 1978, Pressure-solution at grain-to-grain contacts: Geochimica et Cosmochim. Acta, v. 42, p. 1383–1389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. RUTTER, E.H., 1983, Pressure solution in nature, theory, and experiment:Journal of the Geological Society of London, v. 140, p. 725–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. SCHOLLE, P.A., AND HALLEY, R.B., 1985, Burial diagenesis: Out of sight, out of mind!in Schneidermann, N., and Harris, P.M., eds., Carbonate Cements: Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Special Publication 36, p. 309–334.Google Scholar
  24. SCOFFIN, T.C., 1987, An Introduction to Carbonate Sediments and Rocks: Glasgow, Blackie and Son, 274 p.Google Scholar
  25. SWIRYDCZUK, K., WILKINSON, B.H., AND SMITH, G.R., 1979, The Pliocene Glenns Ferry Oolite: Lake-margin carbonate deposition in the southwestem Snake River Plain:Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 49, p. 995–1004.Google Scholar
  26. SWIRYDCZUK, K., WILKINSON, B.H., AND SMITH, G.R., 1980, The Pliocene Glenns Ferry Oolite-ll: Sedimentology of oolitic lacustrine ter race deposits:Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 50, p. 1237–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. TAYLOR, J.M., 1950, Pore-space reduction in sandstones:American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 34, p. 701–716.Google Scholar
  28. WANLESS, H.R., 1979, Limestone response to stress: pressure solution and dolomitization:Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 49, p. 437–462.Google Scholar
  29. WONG, P.K., AND OLDERSHAW, A., 1981, Burial cementation in the Devonian Kaybob reef complex, Alberta, Canada:Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 51, p. 507–520.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Bruce Railsback
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeologyUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations