Advertisement

Carbonates and Evaporites

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 1–8 | Cite as

Modern ooids of Cleopatra Beach, Gokova (South Aegean Sea) Turkey: Results from petrographyand scanning electron microscopy

  • Suayip Üsenmez
  • Baki Varol
  • Gerald M. Friedman
  • Erdogan Tekin
General Papers

Abstract

Modern ooids from the Cleopatra Beach on Island in the Gökova Bay, South Aegean Sea, resemble ooids formed on the Bahamian platform. The concentric coatings of the ooids consist of two or more laminae around a carbonate- or non-carbonate nucleus. The oolite cortex is transparent, whereas the non-transparent portions seem to be the dark fields on the oolitic surfaces. The ooids are mixed with molluscan skeletal debris displaying micritic envelopes. Weakly consolidated ooids have been cemented by calcite in the form of meniscus cement.

According to electron-microscope studies, three kinds of crystal shapes have been distinguished, as follows:
  1. 1-

    Micronodules attributed to microboring organisms such as cyanobacteria or coccoids;

     
  2. 2-

    Tablet-shaped crusts of hemispheres; likely produced by bacterial activity,

     
  3. 3-

    Acicular- or elongate crystals precipitated directly from sea water in vacated holes of the microborings or as of the tangentially orientated parts of the ooids.

     

Algal- and bacterial processes are thought to have been main sources of the carbonate that was precipitated to form the ooids.

Keywords

Ooids Calcite Crystal Oolite Sedimentary Petrology Micrite Envelope 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. BOQUET, E., BORONAT, A., and RAMOS-CORMENZANA, A., 1973, Production of calcite (calcium carbonate) crystals by soil bacteria is a general phenomenon:Nature, v. 246, p. 527–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BATHURST, R.G.C., 1966, Boring algae, micrite envelopes and lithification of molluscan biosparite:Geol. Journ., v. 5, p. 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. BEALES, F.W., 1958. Ancient sediments of Bahaman type:Amer. Assoc. Petrol. Geologists Bull., v. 42, p. 1845–1880.Google Scholar
  4. BUCZYNSKI, C., and CHAFETZ, H.S., 1990, Habit of bacterially induced precipitates of calcium carbonate and the influence of medium vicosity on mineralogy:Jour. Sedimentary Petrology, v. 61, p. 226–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ESELLER, G., 1990, Modern ooids from Sedir Island (Cleopatra Beach). S.Aegean Sea: International Earth Sciences Congress on Aegean Region, Izmir-Türkiye, Abstracts, p. 101–102.Google Scholar
  6. FABRICIUS, F.H., 1977, Origin of marine ooids and grapestones:Contrib. Sed., v. 7, p. 113.Google Scholar
  7. FREEMAN, T., 1962, Quiet water oolites from Laguna Madre, Texas:Jour. Sedimentary Petrology, v. 32, p. 475–483.Google Scholar
  8. FRIEDMAN, G.M., AMIEL, A.J., BRAUN, MOSHE, and MILLER, D.C., 1973, Generation of carbonate particles and laminites in algal mats-example from sea-marginal hypersaline pool, Gulf of Aqaba, Red Sea:Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists, Bull., v. 57, p. 541–557Google Scholar
  9. FRIEDMAN, G.M., GEBELIN, C.D., and SANDERS, J.E., 1971, Micrite envelopes of carbonate grain are not exclusively of photosynthetic algal origin:Sedimentology, v. 16, p. 89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. GARBER, R.A., FRIEDMAN, G.M., and NISSENBAUM, A., 1981, Concentric aragonitic ooids from the Dead Sea:Jour. Sedimentary Petrology, v. 51, p. 455–458.Google Scholar
  11. GOLOBIC, S., BRENT, G., and LECAMPION, T., 1970, Scanning electron microscopy of endolithic algae and fungi using a multipurpose casting-embedding technique:Lethaia, v. 3, p. 203–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. HARRIS, P.M., HALLEY, R.B., and LUKAS, K.J., 1979, Endolithic microborings and their preservation in Holocene-Pleistocene (Bahama-Florida) ooids:Geology, v. 7, p. 216–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. KOBLUK, D.R., and RISK, M.J., 1977, Calcification of exposed filaments of endolithic algae, micrite envelope formation and sediment production:Jour. Sedimentary Petrology, v. 47, p. 517–528.Google Scholar
  14. LALOU, C., 1957, Studies on bacterial precipitation of carbonates in sea water:Jour. Sedimentary Petrology, v. 27, p. 190–195.Google Scholar
  15. MARGOLIS, S.; and REX, R.W., 1971, Endolithic algae and micrite envelope formation in Bahamian oolites as revealed by scanning electron microscopy:Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 82, p. 843–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. MAURIN, A.F.; and NOEL, D., 1977, A possible bacterial origin for Famennian micrites: in Flügel, E., ed., Fossil Algae, New York, Springer-Verlag, p. 136–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. MAY, J.A.; and PERKINS, R.D., 1979, Endolithic infestation of carbonate substrates below the sediment-water interface:Jour. Sedimentary Petrology, v. 49, p. 357–378.Google Scholar
  18. MITTERER, R.M., 1971, Comparative amino acid composition of calcified and non-calcified polychaete worm tubes:Comp. Biochem. Physiol. p. 38 B, 405–409.Google Scholar
  19. NEWELL, N.D.; IMBRIE J.; and PURDY, E.G., 1960, Bahamian oolitic sand:Jour. Geol. v. 68, p. 481–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. SUESS, E., and FUTTERER, D., 1972, Aragonitic ooids: Experimental precipitation from seawater in the presence of humic acid:Sedimentology, v. 19, p. 129–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Suayip Üsenmez
    • 1
  • Baki Varol
    • 2
  • Gerald M. Friedman
    • 3
    • 4
  • Erdogan Tekin
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Engineering and ArchitectureGazi UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Faculty of Science, Department of Geological EngineeringAnkara UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  3. 3.Department of GeologyBrooklyn College and Graduate School of the City University of New YorkBrooklyn
  4. 4.The Northeastern Science Foundation, Inc. affiliated with Brookly College-CUNYRensselaer Center of Applied GeologyTroy

Personalised recommendations