Journal of Elementary Science Education

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 15–26

Applicability of the DAST-C to the images of scientists drawn by students of different racial groups

Article

Abstract

The perceptions students hold of scientists has been a subject of study since Mead and Metraux first reported having students draw scientists in 1957. Subsequent work in this area by Chambers (1983) and Schibeci and Sorensen (1983) led to the clear identification of a number of attributes or elements comprising stereotypical images students possess about scientists. Building on this work, Finson, Beaver, and Cramond (1995) developed a checklist (the Draw-A-Scientist Test Checklist, or DAST-C) for use in assessing drawings of scientists. One of the advantages of the checklist was that quantifiable scores for drawings could be derived and, hence, be subject to comparative data analysis. Researchers are finding out that stereotypical images can have specific influences on the shaping of children’s perceptions in science. Of particular concern is the impact of negative or stereotypical images of scientists on the career aspirations of females and minorities. Since the DAST-C has been used in a growing number of studies on students’ perceptions of scientists, the validity of the DAST-C for use with multicultural groups needs to be examined. In this study, drawings were obtained from eighth grade students who were Caucasian, Native American, and African American. The drawings were analyzed and scored using the DAST-C. Comparisons of those results showed no significant differences between groups.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chambers, D. W. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: The Draw-A-Scientist Test.Science Education, 67(2), 255–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dickson, J. M., Saylor, C. F., & Finch, A. J., Jr. (1990). Personality factors, family structure, and sex of drawn figure on the Draw-A-Person Test.Journal of Personality Assessment, 55(1 & 2) 362–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Driver, R. (1983).The pupil as scientist. London, England: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Finson, K. D., Beaver, J. B., & Cramond, B. L. (1995). Development and field test of a checklist for the Draw-A-Scientist Test.School Science and Mathematics, 95(4), 195–205.Google Scholar
  5. Flick, L. (1990). Scientists in residence program improving children’s image of science and scientists.School Science and Mathematics, 90(3), 204–214.Google Scholar
  6. Gardner, H. (1980).Artful scribbles, New York: Bavi Books.Google Scholar
  7. Hill, O. W., Pettus, W. C., & Hedin, B. A. (1990). Three studies of factors affecting the attitudes of blacks and females toward the pursuit of science and sciencerelated careers.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(4), 289–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Huber, R. A., & Burton, G. M. (1995). What do students think scientists look like?School Science and Mathematics, 95(7), 371–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. MacCorquodale, P. (1984, August).Self image science and math: Does the image of the scientist keep girls and minorities from pursuing science and math? Paper presented at the 79th Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
  10. Mason, C. L., Kahle, J. B., & Gardner, A. L. (1991). Draw-A-Scientist Test: Future implications.School Science and Mathematics, 91(5), 193–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mead, M., & Metraux, R. (1957). Image of the scientist among high school students: A pilot study.Science, 126, 384–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. National Science Board. (1986).Task committee on undergraduate science and engineering education: Undergraduate science, mathematics and engineering education. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  13. National Science Foundation. (2000). Representation in science and engineering. InWomen, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering, 1996. Available online: 〈www.nsf.fov/sbe/srs/nsf96311/wmch1.html〉.Google Scholar
  14. Oakes, J. (1990). Opportunities, achievement, and choice: Women and minority students in science and mathematics.Review of Research in Education, 16, 153–222.Google Scholar
  15. Odell, M. R. I., Hewitt, P., Bowman, J., & Boone, W. J. (1993, April).Stereotypical images of scientists: A cross-age study. Paper presented at the 41st Annual Meeting of the National Science Teachers Association, Kansas City, Mo.Google Scholar
  16. Ross, K. E. K. (1993, April).The role of affective and gender influences on choice of college science major. Paper presented at the 41st Annual Meeting of the National Science Teachers Association, Kansas City, MO.Google Scholar
  17. Schibeci, R. A. (1986). Images of science and scientists and science education.Science Education, 70(2), 139–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schibeci, R. A., & Sorenson, I. (1983). Elementary school children’s perceptions of scientists.School Science and Mathematics, 83(1), 14–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sumrall, W. J. (1995). Reasons for the perceived images of scientists by race and gender of students in grades 1–7.School Science and Mathematics, 95(2), 83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ward, A. (1977). Magician in a white coat.Science Activities, 14(1), 6–9.Google Scholar
  21. Yager, R. E., & Yager, S. O. (1985). Changes in perceptions of science for third seventh, and eleventh grade students.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22, 347–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Teacher EducationBradley UniversityPeoria

Personalised recommendations