Advertisement

Journal of Cancer Education

, 22:250 | Cite as

Oral cancer prevention and early detection: Using the PRECEDE-PROCEED Framework to guide the training of health professional students

  • Gabrielle F. Cannick
  • Alice M. Horowitz
  • David R. Garr
  • Susan G. Reed
  • Brad W. Neville
  • Terry A. Day
  • Robert F. Woolson
  • Daniel T. Lackland
Articles

Abstract

Background. Teaching cancer prevention and detection is important in health professional education. It is desirable to select a comprehensive framework for teaching oral cancer (OC) prevention and detection skills.Methods. The PRECEDE-PROCEED model was used to design a randomized pretest and posttest study of the OC prevention and detection skills of dental students (n=104). OC knowledge, opinions, and competencies were evaluated.Results. Second year students in the intervention group were more competent than those in the control group.Conclusions. The novel use of PRECEDE-PROCEED sets a precedent for designing a standardized OC curriculum for a wide range of health professional disciplines.J Cancer Educ. 2007; 22: 250–253.

Keywords

Oral Cancer Objective Structure Clinical Examination Dental Student Health Professional Student Cancer Educ 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Allan J, Barwick T, Cashman S, et al. Clinical prevention and population health: a curriculum framework for health professions. Am J Prev Med. 2004;27:471–476.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, November 2000; 2.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer Statistics, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006;56:106–130.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Eyre HJ. American Cancer Society Guidelines for the Early Detection of Cancer, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006;56:11–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ahluwalia KP, Yellowitz JA, Goodman HS, Horowitz AM. An assessment of oral cancer prevention curricula in U.S. medical schools. J Cancer Educ. 1998;13:90–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rankin KV, Burzynski NJ, Silverman S Jr, Scheetz JP. Cancer curricula in U.S. dental schools. J Cancer Educ. 1999;14:8–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tomar SL, Silverman S Jr, Carpenter WM. Oral cancer education training methods: a comparison of self-study and didactic approaches. J Cancer Educ. 1998;13:141–144.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burzynski NJ, Rankin KV, Silverman S Jr, Scheetz JP, Jones DL. Graduating dental students’ perceptions of oral cancer education. J Cancer Educ. 2002;17:83–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cannick GF, Horowitz AM, Drury TF, Reed SG, Day TA. Assessing oral cancer knowledge among dental students in South Carolina. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005;136:373–378.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cannick GF, Horowitz AM, Reed SG, Drury TF, Day TA. Opinions of South Carolina dental students toward tobacco intervention. J Public Health Dent. 2006;66:44–48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reed SG, Grijebovskaya Duffy N, Walters KC, Day TA. Oral cancer knowledge and experience: a survey of South Carolina medical students in 2002. J Cancer Educ. 2005;20:136–142.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rankin KV, Jones DL, McDaniel RK. Oral cancer education in dental schools: survey of Texas dental students. J Cancer Educ. 1996;11:80–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yip JK, Hay JL, Ostroff JS, Stewart RK, Cruz GD. Dental students’ attitudes toward smoking cessation guidelines. J Dent Educ. 2000;64:641–650.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kerr RA, Changrani JG, Gany FM, Cruz GD. An academic dental center grapples with oral cancer disparities: current collaboration and future opportunities. J Dent Educ. 2004;68:531–541.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Green L, Kreuter M. Health Promotion Planning: An Educational and Ecological Approach. 4th ed. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill; 2005.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shenkin JD, Horowitz AM, Drury TF, Kanellis M. Attitudes of pediatric dentists towards tobacco intervention for children and adolescents: a pilot survey. Pediatr Dent. 2003;25:53–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Canto MT, Horowitz AM, Drury TF, Goodman HS. Maryland family physicians’ knowledge, opinions, and practices about oral cancer. Oral Oncol. 2002;38:416–424.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Horowitz AM, Drury TF, Goodman HS, Yellowitz JA. Oral pharyngeal cancer prevention and early detection: dentists’ opinions and practices. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000;131:453–462.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Harden R, Stevenson M, Downie W, Wilson G. Assesment of clinical competence using objective structured examination. Br Med J. 1975;1:447–451.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cannick GR, Horowitz AM, Garr DR, Reed SG, Neville BW, Day TA, Woolson RF, Lackland DT. Journal of Dental Education 2007; 71:1203–1209.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Eva KW. Issues to consider when planning and conducting educational research. J Dent Educ. 2004;68:316–323.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sachdeva AK. Faculty development and support needed to integrate the learning of prevention in the curricula of medical schools. Acad Med. 2000;75:S35-S42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Association for Cancer Education 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabrielle F. Cannick
    • 1
  • Alice M. Horowitz
    • 2
  • David R. Garr
    • 1
  • Susan G. Reed
    • 1
  • Brad W. Neville
    • 1
  • Terry A. Day
    • 1
  • Robert F. Woolson
    • 1
  • Daniel T. Lackland
    • 1
  1. 1.Medical University of South CarolinaCharleston
  2. 2.National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial ResearchNational Institutes of HealthBethesda

Personalised recommendations