Journal of Cancer Education

, 22:250 | Cite as

Oral cancer prevention and early detection: Using the PRECEDE-PROCEED Framework to guide the training of health professional students

  • Gabrielle F. Cannick
  • Alice M. Horowitz
  • David R. Garr
  • Susan G. Reed
  • Brad W. Neville
  • Terry A. Day
  • Robert F. Woolson
  • Daniel T. Lackland
Articles

Abstract

Background. Teaching cancer prevention and detection is important in health professional education. It is desirable to select a comprehensive framework for teaching oral cancer (OC) prevention and detection skills.Methods. The PRECEDE-PROCEED model was used to design a randomized pretest and posttest study of the OC prevention and detection skills of dental students (n=104). OC knowledge, opinions, and competencies were evaluated.Results. Second year students in the intervention group were more competent than those in the control group.Conclusions. The novel use of PRECEDE-PROCEED sets a precedent for designing a standardized OC curriculum for a wide range of health professional disciplines.J Cancer Educ. 2007; 22: 250–253.

References

  1. 1.
    Allan J, Barwick T, Cashman S, et al. Clinical prevention and population health: a curriculum framework for health professions. Am J Prev Med. 2004;27:471–476.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, November 2000; 2.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer Statistics, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006;56:106–130.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Eyre HJ. American Cancer Society Guidelines for the Early Detection of Cancer, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006;56:11–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ahluwalia KP, Yellowitz JA, Goodman HS, Horowitz AM. An assessment of oral cancer prevention curricula in U.S. medical schools. J Cancer Educ. 1998;13:90–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rankin KV, Burzynski NJ, Silverman S Jr, Scheetz JP. Cancer curricula in U.S. dental schools. J Cancer Educ. 1999;14:8–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tomar SL, Silverman S Jr, Carpenter WM. Oral cancer education training methods: a comparison of self-study and didactic approaches. J Cancer Educ. 1998;13:141–144.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burzynski NJ, Rankin KV, Silverman S Jr, Scheetz JP, Jones DL. Graduating dental students’ perceptions of oral cancer education. J Cancer Educ. 2002;17:83–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cannick GF, Horowitz AM, Drury TF, Reed SG, Day TA. Assessing oral cancer knowledge among dental students in South Carolina. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005;136:373–378.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cannick GF, Horowitz AM, Reed SG, Drury TF, Day TA. Opinions of South Carolina dental students toward tobacco intervention. J Public Health Dent. 2006;66:44–48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reed SG, Grijebovskaya Duffy N, Walters KC, Day TA. Oral cancer knowledge and experience: a survey of South Carolina medical students in 2002. J Cancer Educ. 2005;20:136–142.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rankin KV, Jones DL, McDaniel RK. Oral cancer education in dental schools: survey of Texas dental students. J Cancer Educ. 1996;11:80–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yip JK, Hay JL, Ostroff JS, Stewart RK, Cruz GD. Dental students’ attitudes toward smoking cessation guidelines. J Dent Educ. 2000;64:641–650.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kerr RA, Changrani JG, Gany FM, Cruz GD. An academic dental center grapples with oral cancer disparities: current collaboration and future opportunities. J Dent Educ. 2004;68:531–541.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Green L, Kreuter M. Health Promotion Planning: An Educational and Ecological Approach. 4th ed. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill; 2005.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shenkin JD, Horowitz AM, Drury TF, Kanellis M. Attitudes of pediatric dentists towards tobacco intervention for children and adolescents: a pilot survey. Pediatr Dent. 2003;25:53–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Canto MT, Horowitz AM, Drury TF, Goodman HS. Maryland family physicians’ knowledge, opinions, and practices about oral cancer. Oral Oncol. 2002;38:416–424.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Horowitz AM, Drury TF, Goodman HS, Yellowitz JA. Oral pharyngeal cancer prevention and early detection: dentists’ opinions and practices. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000;131:453–462.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Harden R, Stevenson M, Downie W, Wilson G. Assesment of clinical competence using objective structured examination. Br Med J. 1975;1:447–451.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cannick GR, Horowitz AM, Garr DR, Reed SG, Neville BW, Day TA, Woolson RF, Lackland DT. Journal of Dental Education 2007; 71:1203–1209.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Eva KW. Issues to consider when planning and conducting educational research. J Dent Educ. 2004;68:316–323.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sachdeva AK. Faculty development and support needed to integrate the learning of prevention in the curricula of medical schools. Acad Med. 2000;75:S35-S42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Association for Cancer Education 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabrielle F. Cannick
    • 1
  • Alice M. Horowitz
    • 2
  • David R. Garr
    • 1
  • Susan G. Reed
    • 1
  • Brad W. Neville
    • 1
  • Terry A. Day
    • 1
  • Robert F. Woolson
    • 1
  • Daniel T. Lackland
    • 1
  1. 1.Medical University of South CarolinaCharleston
  2. 2.National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial ResearchNational Institutes of HealthBethesda

Personalised recommendations