Study persistence and academic achievement as a function of the type of competing tendencies

  • Willy Lens
  • Marlies Lacante
  • Maarten Vansteenkiste
  • Dora Herrera
Article

Abstract

In order to understand and predict students’ achievement and persistence at learning activities, many contemporary motivational models consider how much students are motivated for their school work. However, students’ achievement and persistence might not only be affected by their amount of study motivation, but also by the motivation to engage in competing alternative activities, as suggested three decades ago by Atkinson and Birch in their “Dynamics of Action” (1970). Building on this line of theorizing, the present contribution indicates that it is not only instructive to consider the level of students’ motivation for these competing activities, but also the type of activities they engage in, that is leisure vs. working activities. Two studies demonstrated that whereas time spent on working activities is inversely related to study motivation, attitude, persistence and academic achievement, such relationships were not found for leisure time engagement. Spending some time on leisure time activities does not interfere with optimal learning.

Key words

Academic achievement Competing motivations Dynamics of action 

Résumé

Dans le but de comprendre et de prédire la performance et la persistance des étudiants dans des activités d’apprentissage, plusieurs théories contemporaines de la motivation considèrent l’intensité de la motivation des étudiants à l’endroit de leur travail scolaire. Cependant, la performance et la persistance des étudiants peuvent dépendre non seulement de l’intensité de la motivation à l’étude, mais aussi de la motivation à s’engager dans des activités différentes, comme l’ont déjà suggéré Atkinson et Birch dans leur ‘Dynamics of action’ (1970). Se basant sur cette théorie, le présent article propose de considérer non seulement le niveau de motivation des étudiants pour ces activités différentes, mais aussi le type d’activité (loisir vs travail). Deux études démontrent que le temps passé au travail est inversement relié à la motivation et à la persistance à l’étude, à l’attitude (positive) envers l’étude et au rendement scolaire; une telle relation n’est pas apparue pour le temps consacré aux loisirs. Un certain temps de détente ne nuit pas à l’apprentissage optimal.

References

  1. Atkinson, J.W., & Birch, D. (1970).The dynamics of action. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson, J.W., & Birch, D. (1978).Introduction to motivation (2nd edition). New York: Van NostrandGoogle Scholar
  3. Buelens M., & Lacante, M. (1998).Drop out in het hoger onderwijs van één cyclus. Een onderzoek naar de redenen van studiestaken bij eerstejaarsstudenten van de Katholieke Hogeschool Leuven [Drop out in higher education of one cycle. Research into the causes of drop out among first year students of the KHLeuven]. Unpublished master thesis. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.Google Scholar
  4. Creten, H., Lens, W., & Simons, J. (2001). The role of perceived instrumentality in student motivation. In A. Efklides, J. Kuhl & R.M. Sorrentino (Eds.),Trends and prospects in motivation research (pp. 37–45). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Creten, H., Nijsmans, I., Lens, W., Douterlungne, M., & Cossey, H. (1998).Algemene vakken en beroepsleerlingen: Op dezelfde golflengte? Motivatie van leerlingen en functioneren van leerkrachten algemene vakken in het beroepssecundair onderwijs [Theoretical courses in vocational secondary education: Are they on the same wave-length?]. Leuven: Department of Psychology & HIVA.Google Scholar
  6. Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (1985).Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  7. Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (2000). The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior.Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gergen, K.J. (1991).The saturated self: Dilemmas of identity in contemporary life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  9. Herrera, D. (2002).Social insertion of high school graduates in Lima: A socio-psychological study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.Google Scholar
  10. Iyengar, S.S., & Lepper, M.R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 995–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lacante, M., Lens, W., De Metsenaere, M., Van Esbroeck, R., de Jaeger, K., de Coninck, T., & Santy, L. (2002).Drop-out in het eerste jaar hoger onderwijs Dropout in the first year of higher education (Eindrapport OBPWO 98.11). Brussel/Leuven: Wrije Universiteit Brussel/Katholike Universiteit Leuven.Google Scholar
  12. Locke, E.A., & Latham, G.P. (1990).A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  13. McCown, W.G., Latham, G.P. (1990). An experimental study of some hypothesized behaviors and personality variables of college student procrastinators.Personality and Individual Differences, 8, 781–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pintrich, P.R., & Schunk, D.H. (2002).Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ. Merrill-Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  15. Roede, E. (1989).Explaining student investment: An investigation of high school students’ retrospective causal accounts of their investment in school Amsterdam: SCO-University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  16. Schwartz, B. (2000). Self-determination: The tiranny of freedomAmerican Psychologist, 55, 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Vanheste, T., Lens, W., & Vandenberghe, R. (2001).Motivatie en leerstijlen bij eerstejaarsstudenten aan de universiteit [Motivation and learning styles among college freshmen] Leuven: University of Leuven.Google Scholar
  18. Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Soenens, B., & Lens, W. (2004). How to become a persevering exerciser? Providing a clear, future intrinsic goal in an autonomy supportive way.Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 26, 232–249.Google Scholar
  19. Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., De Witte, S., Dewitte, H., & Deci E.L. (2004). The ‘why’ and ‘why not’ of job search behavior: Their relation to searching, unemployment experience, and well-being.European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 345–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Weinstein, C.E., Palmer, D.H., & Schulte, C. (1987).Learning and study strategy inventory. Clearwater, FL: H & H Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Lisbon, Portugal/ Springer Netherlands 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Willy Lens
    • 1
  • Marlies Lacante
    • 1
  • Maarten Vansteenkiste
    • 1
  • Dora Herrera
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of LimaLima 33Peru

Personalised recommendations