Can salience of gender identity impair math performance among 7–8 years old girls? The moderating role of task difficulty

  • Emmanuelle Neuville
  • Jean-Claude Croizet
Article

Abstract

Can the salience of gender identity affect the math performance of 7–8 year old girls? Third-grade girls and boys were required to solve arthmetical problems of varied difficulty. Prior to the test, one half of the participants had their gender identity activated. Results showed that activation of gender identity affected girls’ performance but not boys. When their gender was activated as opposed to when it was not, girls solved more problems when the material was less difficult but underperformed on the difficult problems. Results are discussed with regard to the stereotype threat literature.

Key words

Children Gender Math performance Stereotype 

Résumé

La saillance de l’identité de genre peut-elle affecter la performance mathématique de filles âgées de 7–8 ans? Des filles et des garçons de cet âge devaient résoudre des problèmes d’arithmétique de difficulté variée. Avant le test, on activait l’identité de genre de là moitié des enfants. Les résultats montrent que l’activation de l’identité de genre affecte la performance des filles mais pas celle des garçons. Lorsque leur identité de genre est activée (vs. n’est pas activée), les filles réussissent plus de problèmes faciles mais rencontrent plus de difficultés sur les problèmes difficiles. Les résultats sont discutés en référence à la littérature sur la menace du stéréotype.

References

  1. Ambady, N., Shih, M., Kim, A., & Pittinsky T. (2001). Stereotype susceptibility in children: Effects of identity activation on quantitative performance,Psychological Science, 12, 385–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ben-Zeev, T., Fein, S., & Inzlicht, M. (2005). Arousal and stereotype threat.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 174–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berk, L.E. (2000).Child Development (5ème edition). Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  4. Blascovich, J., Spencer, S. J., Quinn, D., & Steele, C. (2001). African Americans and high blood pressure: The role of stereotype threat,Psychological Science, 12, 225–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brehm, J.W. (1999). The intensity of emotion.Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 2–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differenciation.Psychological Review, 106, 676–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Croizet, J.-C., Desprès, G., Gauzins, M.-E., Huguet, P., Leyens, J.-P., & Méot, A. (2004). Stereotype threat undermines intellectual performance by triggering a disruptive mental load.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 721–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Marree, K.G., Wheeler, S.C., & Petty, P.E. (2005). Priming a new identity: Self-monitoring moderates the effects nonself primes on self-judgements and behaviour.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 657–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Doise, W., & Mugny, G. (1984).The social development of the intellect. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dutrévis, M., & Croizet, J.C. (2005). Reputation of intellectual inferiority undermines learning efficiency.Current Research in Social Psychology, 10, 104–115, <http://www.uiowa.edu/~grpproc/crisp/crisp.html>.Google Scholar
  11. Easterbrook, J.A. (1959). The effect of emotion on, cue utilization and the organization of behavior.Psychological Review, 66, 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eccles, J.S. (1994). Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices.Psychology of Women Quaterly, 18, 585–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gest, S.D., Domitrovich, C.E., & Welsh, J.A. (2005). Peer academic reputation in elementary school: Associations with changes in self-concept and academic skills.Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 337–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huguet, P., & Regner, I. (2004).What keeps girls out of math? From autobiographical inhibition to stereotype threat. Communication au Small Group Meeting of the European Association Social Psychology: Understanding the academic underachievement of low status group members. Paris, France.Google Scholar
  15. Huguet, P., Brunot, S., & Monteil, J.-M. (2001). Geometry versus drawing: Changing the meaning of the task as a means to change performance.Social Psychology of Education, 4, 219–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Keller, J., & Dauenheimer, D. (2003). Stereotype threat in the classroom: Dejection mediates the disrupting threat effect on women’s math performance.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 371–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Maass, A., & Cadinu, M. (2003). Stereotype threat: When minority members underperform.European Review of Social Psychology, 14, 243–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Marsh, H.W., & Hau, K.T. (2003). Big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. A cross cultural (26-country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools.American Psychologist, 58, 364–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Marx, D.M., & Stapel, D.A. (2006). Distinguishing stereotype threat from priming effects: On the role of the social self and threat-based concerns.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 243–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mc Kown, C., & Weinstein, R.S. (2003). The development and consequences of stereotype consciousness in middle childhood,Child development, 74, 498–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Monteil, J.-M. & Huguet, P. (1999).Social context and cognitive performance: Toward a social psychology of cognition Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  22. National Science Foundation (1997). Women and Science: Celebrating achievements, charting challenges, Arlington: National Science Foundation. Retrieved June 24, 2004, http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/1997/nsf9775/start.htmGoogle Scholar
  23. O’Brien, L.T., & Crandall, C.S. (2003). Stereotype threat and arousal: Effects on women’s math performance.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 782–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. O’Brien, L.T., & Hummert, M.L. (2006). Memory performance of late middle-age adults: Contrasting self-stereotyping and stereotype threat accounts of assimilation to age stereotypes.Social Cognition, 24, 338–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Programme for International Student Assessment [OECD PISA] (2004). Retrieved Mars 24, 2005, from http://www.pisa.oecd.org/Google Scholar
  26. Schmader, T., & Johns, M. (2003). Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 440–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shih, M., Pittinsky, T.L., & Ambady, N. (1999). Stereotype, susceptibility: Shifts in quantitative performance from socio-cultural identification.Psychology Science, 10, 80–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shih, M., Ambady, N., Richeson, J., Fujita, K., & Gray, H.M. (2002). Stereotype performance boosts: The impact of selfrelevance and the manner of stereotype activation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 638–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Skrypnek, B.J., & Snyder, M. (1982). On the self-perpetuating nature of stereotypes about women and men.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 277–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Spencer, S.J., Steele, C.M., & Quinn, D.M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Steele, C.M. (1992). Race and the schooling of Black Americans.The Athlantic Monthly, 269, 68–78.Google Scholar
  32. Steele, C.M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance,American psychologist, 52, 613–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Steele, J. (2003). Children’s gender stereotypes about math: The role of stereotype stratification.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 2587–2606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Steele, C.M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Steele, C.M., Spencer, S.J., & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype threat and social identity threat. In M.P. Zanna,Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 34). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  36. Test d’Evaluation Nationale CE2-Direction des Etudes et de la Prospective D.E.P. (2001). Retrieved from http://cisad.adc.education.fr/eval/on August 22, 2003.Google Scholar
  37. Walton, G.M., & Cohen, G.L. (2003). Stereotype Lift.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 456–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wheeler, S.C., & Petty, R.E. (2001). The effects of stereotype activation on behavior: A review of possible mechanisms.Psychological Bulletin, 127, 797–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wheeler, S.C., Jarvis, W.B., & Petty, R.E. (2001). Think unto others: The self-destructive impact of negative racial stereotypes.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 173–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zajonc, R.B. (1965). The requirements and design of a standard group task.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1, 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Lisbon, Portugal/ Springer Netherlands 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emmanuelle Neuville
    • 1
  • Jean-Claude Croizet
    • 2
  1. 1.LAPSCO/PsychologyUniversity Blaise PascalClermont-FerrandFrance
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of PoitiersPoitiersFrance

Personalised recommendations