So young and already victims of stereotype threat: Socio-economic status and performance of 6 to 9 years old children on Raven’s progressive matrices

Article

Abstract

The aim of this study was to verify whether children from low socio-economic status (SES) are victims of stereotype threat. Children in first grade (6 to 7 years old) and third grade (8 to 9 years old) performed Raven’s progressive matrices, an intellectual ability test commonly used by psychologists. The test was presented either with the (evaluative) instructions recommended by Raven et al. (1998) or with non evaluative instructions. Children’s SES and beliefs concerning differences of abilities at school as a function of SES were also assessed. The results indicated that, as early as first grade, participants believed that children from high SES are better at school than children from low SES. Furthermore, low SES participants’ performance on the Raven’s matrices was lower in the evaluative condition than in the non evaluative condition. The experimental instructions did not affect high SES participants’ performance. The discussion explores implications of these results in the use of standardized tests to assess the intellectual abilities of low SES children.

Key words

Scholastic performance Socio-economic status Stereotype threat 

Résumé

Cette étude a pour but de vérifier si des enfants issues de milieux défavorisés sont susceptibles d’être victimes de la menace du stéréotype dès l’école primaire. La performance d’élèves de CP (âgés de 6 à 7 ans) et de CE2 (âgés de 8 à 9 ans) à un test d’intelligence fréquemment utilisé par les psychologues, les matrices de Raven, a été mesurée. Le test a été présenté soit avec les consignes évaluatives standard préconisées par les concepteurs du test, soit avec des consignes non évaluatives. Le niveau socio-économique des enfants était évalué ainsi que leur croyance en l’existence d’une différence d’aptitudes scolaires en fonction du niveau socio-économique. Les résultats montrent que, dès le CP, les élèves croient en la supériorité scolaire des enfants favorisés par rapport aux enfants défavorisés. De plus, la performance de ces derniers aux matrices de Raven était plus faible en condition évaluative qu’en condition non-évaluative. La performance des élèves de haut statut socio-économique n’était pas modifiée par le type de consignes utilisées. Les implications de ces résultats pour l’évaluation et l’orientation d’enfants de bas statut socio-économique à l’aide de tests standardisés supposés insensibles aux effets de culture seront discutées.

References

  1. Aboud, F.E. (1988).Children and prejudice. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  2. Ambady, N., Shih, M., Kim, A., & Pittinsky, T.L. (2001). Stereotype susceptibility in children: Effects of identity activation on quantitative performance.Psychological Science, 12, 385–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aronson, J., Lustina, M., Keough, K., Brown, J.L., & Steele, C.M. (1999). When white men can’t do math: Necessary and sufficient factors in stereotype threat.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ben-Zeev, T., Fein, S., & Inzlicht M. (2005). Arousal and stereotype threat.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 174–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berjot, S., & Drozda-Senkowska, E. (2007). How students from different socio-economic status perceive themselves? Study of the SES stereotype content.European Review of Applied Psychology, 57, 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.C. (1964).Les héritiers [The heirs]: Paris: Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, R.P., & Day, E.A. (2006). The difference isn’t Black and White Stereotype threat and the race gap on Raven’s Advanced Progressives MatricesJournal of Applied Psychology, 91, 979–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, R.P., & Pinel, E.C. (2003). Stigma on my mind: Individual differences in the experience of stereotype threat.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 736–747.Google Scholar
  9. Burkley, M., & Blanton, H. (2008). Endorsing a negative in-group stereotype as a self-protective strategy: Sacrificing the group to save the self.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carpenter, P.A., Just, M.A., & Snell, P. (1990). What one intelligence test measures: A theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices test.Psychological Review, 97, 404–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cozarelli, C., Wilkinson, A.V., & Tagler, M.J. (2001). Attitudes toward the poor and attributions for poverty.Journal of Social Issues, 57, 207–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Croizet, J.-C., & Claire, T. (1998). Extending the concept of stereotype threat to social class: The intellectual underperformance of students from low socioeconomic backgrounds.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 588–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Croizet, J.C., Désert, M., Dutrevis, M., & Leyens, J.-Ph. (2001). Stereotype threat, social class, gender and academic under-achievement: When our reputation catches up to us and takes over.Social Psychology of Education, 4, 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Croizet, J.C., Désert, M., Dutrevis, M., & Leyens, J.-Ph. (2003). L’impact des réputations d’infériorité sur les performances intellectuelles [The impact of reputations of inferiority on intellectual performance].Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 16, 97–124.Google Scholar
  15. Désert, M., Croizet, J.-C., & Leyens, J.-Ph. (2002). La menace du stéréotype: Une interaction entre situation et identité [Stereotype threat: An interaction between situation and identity].L’Année Psychologique, 102, 555–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guimond, S., & Roussel, L. (2001). Bragging about one’s school grades: Gender stereotyping and students’ perception of their abilities in science, mathematics and language.Social Psychology of Education, 4, 275–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harrison, L.A., Stevens, C.M., Monty, A.N., & Coakley, C.A. (2006). The consequences of stereotype threat on the academic performance of White and non-White lower income college students.Social Psychology of Education, 9, 341–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Herrnstein, R.J., & Murray, C. (1994).The Bell Curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  19. Humphreys, L.G. (1984). General intelligence. In C.R. Reynolds & R.T. Brown (Eds.),Perspectives on bias in mental testing (pp. 221–247). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hunt, E., & Carlson, J. (2007). Considerations relating to the study of group differences in intelligence.Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 194–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jensen, A.R. (1998).The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  22. Katz, I. (1964). Review of evidence relating to effects of desegregation on the intellectual performance of Negroes.American-Psychologist, 19, 381–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leyens, J.-Ph., Désert, M., Croizet, J.C., & Darcis, C. (2000). Stereotype threat: Are lower status and history of stigmatization preconditions of stereotype threat.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1189–1199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lott, B. (2002). Cognitive and behavioral distancing from the poor.American Psychologist, 57, 100–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Martinot, D., & Désert, M. (2007). Awareness of a gender stereotype personal beliefs and self-perceptions regarding math ability: When boys do not surpass girls.Social Psychology of Education, 10, 455–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mayer, D.M., & Hanges, P.J. (2003). Understanding the stereotype threat effect with “culture free” tests: An examination of its mediator and measurement.Human Performance, 16, 207–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McKown, C., & Weinstein, R.S. (2003). The development and consequences of stereotype consciousness in middle childhood.Child Development, 74, 498–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T.J., Boykin, W.A., Brody, N., Ceci, S. J., Halpern, D. F., Loehlin, J.C., Perloff, R., Sternberg, R.J., & Urbina, S. (1996). Intelligence: Knows and unknows.American Psychologist, 51, 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ostrove, J.M., & Cole, E.R. (2003). Privileging class: Toward a critical psychology of social class in the context of education.Journal of Social Issues, 59, 677–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Raven, J.C., Raven, J., & Court, J.H. (1998).A manual for Raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. London: H. K. Lewis.Google Scholar
  31. Régner, I., Huguet, P., & Monteil, J.-M. (2002). Effects of socioeconomic status information on cognitive ability inferences: When low-SES students make use of a self-threatening stereotype.Social Psychology of Education, 5, 253–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sackett, P.R., Hardison, C.M., & Cullen, M.J. (2004). On interpreting stereotype threat as accounting for African American — White differences on cognitive tests.American Psychologist, 59, 7–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Spencer, B., & Castano, E. (2007). Social class is dead. Long live social class! Stereotype threat among low socioeconomic status individuals.Social Justice Research, 20, 418–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Steele, C.M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance.American Psychologist, 52, 613–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Steele, C.M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Steele, C.M., Spencer, S.J., & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. In M. Zanna (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 34, pp. 379–440). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  37. Sternberg, R.J., & Grigorenko, E.L. (2007). The difficulty of escaping preconceptions in writing an article about the difficulty of escaping preconceptions: Commentary on Hunt and Carlson (2007).Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 221–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stone, J. (2002). Battling the doubt by avoiding practice: The effects of stereotype threat on self-handicapping in white athletes.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1667–1678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. White, K.R. (1982). The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement.Psychological Bulletin, 91 461–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J.S., Yoon, K.S., Harold, R.D., Abreton, A., Freedman-Doan, K., et al. (1997). Change in children’s competence beliefs and subjective task values across the elementary school years: A three-year study.Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 451–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Lisbon, Portugal/ Springer Netherlands 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LAPSCO, UMR 6024 CNRSBlaise Pascal UniversityClermont-FerrandFrance

Personalised recommendations