Journal of Digital Imaging

, Volume 10, Supplement 1, pp 60–66

An analytical look at the effects of compression on medical images

  • Kenneth Persons
  • Patrice Palisson
  • Armando Manduca
  • Bradley J. Erickson
  • Vladimir Savcenko
Plenary Sessions Session 2 Experience at the Mayo Foundation
  • 55 Downloads

Abstract

This article will take an analytical look at how lossy Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) and wavelet image compression techniques affect medical image content. It begins with a brief explanation of how the JPEG and wavelet algorithms work, and describes in general terms what effect they can have on image quality (removal of noise, blurring, and artifacts). It then focuses more specifically on medical image diagnostic content and explains why subtle pathologies, that may be difficult for the human eye to discern because of low contrast, are generally very well preserved by these compression algorithms. By applying a wavelet decomposition to the whole image and to specific regions of interest (ROI), and by understanding how the lossy quantization step attenuates signals in those decomposition energy subbands, much can be learned about how tolerant various anatomical structures are to compression. High-frequency anatomical structures that have their energy represented by a few large coefficients (in the wavelet domain) will be well preserved, while, those structures with high frequency energy distributed over numerous smaller coefficients are the most vulnerable to compression. Digitized films showing subtle chest nodules, a subtle stress fracture, and CT and MR images are used to show these results.

Key words

compression wavelet compression JPEG compression teleradiology PACS medical image compression effects of compression 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Antonini M, Barlaud M, Mathieu P, et al: Image coding using wavelet transform. IEEE Trans Image Proc 1:205–220, 1992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Manduca A, Said A: Wavelet Compression of Medical Images with Set Partitioning in Hierarchial Trees. Medical Imaging Image Display. Proc SPIE 2707:192–200, 1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Said A, Pearlman WA: A new fast and efficient image codec based on set partitioning in hierarchial trees. IEEE Trans Circuits and Systems for Video Tech 6:243–250, 1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Manduca A, Erickson BJ, Persons K, et al: Histogram transformation for improved compression of CT images. Medical Imaging 1997: Image display, SPIE 3031 (in press)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Good WF, Maitz GS, Gur D: Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) Compatible Data of MammogramsGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Karson TH, Chandra S, Morehead AJ: JPEG Compression of Digital Echocardiographic Images: Impact on Image Quality. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 8:306–318, 1995CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cox GG, Cook LT, Insana MF: The effects of lossy compression on the detection of subtle pulmonary nodules. Med Phys 23:127–132, 1996CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Erickson BJ, Manduca A, Persons K, et al: Evaluation of irreversible compression of digitized PA chest radiographs. J Digit Imaging 1997 (in press)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth Persons
    • 1
    • 2
  • Patrice Palisson
    • 1
    • 2
  • Armando Manduca
    • 1
    • 2
  • Bradley J. Erickson
    • 1
    • 2
  • Vladimir Savcenko
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Departments of Information Services, Physiology and BiophysicsMayo FoundationRochester
  2. 2.Diagnostic RadiologyMayo FoundationRochester
  3. 3.842 Center-placeMayo FoundationRochester

Personalised recommendations