Smoking, occupancy and staffing levels in a selection of Dublin pubs pre and post a national smoking ban, lessons for all

  • M. McCaffrey
  • P. G. Goodman
  • K. Kelleher
  • L. Clancy
Original Paper



On the 29th March 2004 the Irish government introduced a comprehensive workplace smoking ban to protect the health of workers. This study evaluates the impact the ban had on staffing levels, customer numbers and smoking rates in a sample of 38 public houses in Dublin.


A total of 38 public houses were visited prior to the introduction of the ban, each visit lasted at least three hours, and the number of staff, customers and the number of people smoking was recorded each hour. Follow-up visits were conducted exactly one year later, on the same day of the week and at the same time of day, allowing controlling for seasonal and weekday effects.


There was a decrease (8.82%) in average staff levels while customer numbers increased by 11% and there was a dramatic reduction in numbers smoking on a visit to a pub (77.8%).


The hospitality industry predicted major job losses as a consequence of the introduction of the smoking ban; this work has shown that there was no significant decrease in the number of staff employed or in customer numbers. There was full compliance, with no customers smoking inside the public houses following the introduction of the ban. The ban has been good for the industry, staff, and customers.


  1. 1.
    Public Health (Tobacco) Acts, Government Publications Office, Dublin. 2002–2004Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Irish Hospitality Industry Alliance (2003) Regulatory Impact Assessment on Draft Ministerial Regulations to Ban Smoking in the Workplace, Including Hospitality Venues [Available at: rawnews/draftministerialregulationtobansmoking.pdf]Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Central Statistics Office (CSO) Ireland, Quarterly National Household Survey. documents/table_3_SeAdj_post_census1.xlsGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fong GT, Hyland A, Borland Ret al. Reductions in Tobacco Smoke Pollution and Increases in Support for Smoke-Free Public Places Following the Implementation of Comprehensive Smoke -Free Workplace Legislation in the Republic of Ireland: Findings from the ITC Ireland/UK Study.Tobacco Control (2006), Vol. 15 supplement III pp. iii51–iii58Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Office Tobacco Control (2004) Press Release Tuesday, 23rd March 2004 [available at: asp?article=192]Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Biener L and Fitzgerald G.,Smoky bars and restaurants: who avoids them and why? Journal of Public Health Management and Practice Jan 1999, 5(1). 74–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Novick, LF. From the Editor. Journal of Public Health Management & Practice (1999), 5: v. [Accessed from Repace (1999)Fact Sheet on ETS]Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Office of Tobacco Control/ TNS mrbi Survey. (2003) Press Release Monday, 16th June, 2003 [available at: http://]Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Office of Tobacco Control/ TNS mrbi Surveys (2002–2006) [available at: reports.asp]Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    The National Health & Lifestyle Surveys: Results of national Health and Lifestyle Surveys SLÁN [Survey of Lifestyle, attitudes and Nutrition] and HBSC [Health behaviour in School-Aged Children], Kelleher C., Nic Gabhainn, S., Friel, S. et al., April 2003. Centre for Health Promotion Studies, NUI, GalwayGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brownson RC, Hopkins DR, Wakefield MA.Effects of Smoking Restrictions in the Workplace. Annual Reviews Public Health. 2002, 23: 333–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Farrelly MC, Evans WN, Sfekas AES.The Impact of Workplace Smoking Bans: Results from a National Survey Tobacco Control. 1999, 8: 272–277CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. McCaffrey
    • 1
  • P. G. Goodman
    • 1
  • K. Kelleher
    • 2
  • L. Clancy
    • 3
  1. 1.Dublin Institute of TechnologyIreland
  2. 2.University College DublinIreland
  3. 3.The Digital DepotResearch Institute for a Tobacco Free SocietyDublin 8Ireland

Personalised recommendations