A complete model of shear dispersion in pipes

  • G. N. Mercer
  • A. J. Roberts
Article

Abstract

High order models of the longitudinal dispersion of a passive contaminant in Poiseuille pipe flow are derive and their validity discussed. The derivation is done using centre manifold theory which provides a systematic and consistent approach to calculating each successive approximation. A stable, non-negative finite difference scheme is formulated which matches the evolution equation to a predetermined order. The limitations imposed by this matching is investigated. The appropriate initial conditions to use for the Taylor model of shear dispersion in pipes are derived. It is shown that the commonly used initial condition of simply taking the cross-sectional average is only a first approximation to the correct initial condition. In a similar manner the correct boundary conditions to be used at the inlet and outlet of a finite length pipe are derived. The generalisation to a pipe with varying cross-section and varying flow properties is studied and the resultant modifications to the advection velocity and the effective dispersion coefficient are calculated. An example of an exponentially varying pipe is considered and the differences between this approach and the classical Taylor theory are examined.

Key words

shear dispersion centre manifold pipes 

References

  1. [1]
    R. Aris, On the dispersion of a solute in a fluid flowing through a tube. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, A235 (1956), 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    C.M. Bender and S.A. Orszag, Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers. McGraw Hill, New York-London-Toronto, 1978.MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    J. Carr, Applications of Centre Manifold Theory. Applied Mathematical Sciences,35, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 1981.MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    J. Carr and R.G. Muncaster, The application of centre manifolds to amplitude expansions. II. Infinite dimensional problems. J. Differential Equations,50 (1983), 280–288.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    P.C. Chatwin, The approach to normality of the concentration distribution of a solute in a solvent flowing along a straight pipe. J. Fluid Mech.,43 (1970), 321–352.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    P.C. Chatwin, Presentation of longitudinal dispersion data. J. Hydraul. Div. Proc. ASCE,106 (1980), 71–83.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    P.C. Chatwin and C.M. Allen, Mathematical models of dispersion in rivers and estuaries. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech.,17 (1985), 119–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    S.C. Chikwendu, Application of a slow-zone model to contaminant dispersion in laminar shear flows. Internat. J. Engrg. Sci.,24 (1986), 1031–1044.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    I. Frankel and H. Brenner, On the foundations of generalised Taylor dispersion theory. J. Fluid Mech.,204 (1989), 97–119.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    W.N. Gill and R. Sankarasubramanian, Exact analysis of unsteady convective diffusion. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, A316 (1970), 341–350.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    V.K. Gupta and R.N. Bhattacharya, A new derivation of the Taylor-Aris theory of solute dispersion in a capillary. Water Resources Res.,19 (1983), 945–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    G.N. Mercer and A.J. Roberts, A centre manifold description of contaminant dispersion in channels with varying flow properties. SIAM J. Appl. Math.,50 (1990), 1547–1565.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    M. Pagitsas, A. Nadim and H. Brenner, Multiple time scale analysis of macrotransport processes. Physica,135A (1986), 533–550.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    A.J. Roberts, The application of centre manifold theory to the evolution of systems which vary slowly in space. J. Austral. Math. Soc., B29 (1988), 480–500.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    A.J. Roberts, Appropriate initial conditions for asymptotic descriptions of the long term evolution of dynamical systems. J. Austral. Math. Soc., B31 (1989), 48–75.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    A.J. Roberts, The utility of an invariant manifold description of the evolution of dynamical systems. SIAM J. Math. Anal.,20 (1989), 1447–1458.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    A.J. Roberts, Boundary conditions for approximate differential equations. J. Austral. Math. Soc., B34 (1992), 54–80.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    R. Smith, A delay-diffusion description for contaminant dispersion. J. Fluid Mech.,105 (1981), 469–486.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    R. Smith, Diffusion in shear flows made easy: the Taylor limit. J. Fluid Mech.,175 (1987), 201–214.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    R. Smith, Entry and exit conditions for flow reactors. IMA J. Appl. Math.,41 (1988), 1–40.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    A.N. Stokes and N.G. Barton, The concentration distribution produced by shear dispersion of solute in Poiseuille flow. J. Fluid Mech.,210 (1990), 201–221.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    G.I. Taylor, Dispersion of soluble matter in a solvent flowing through a tube. Proc. Roy. Soc. London A219 (1953), 186–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    G.I. Taylor, Conditions under which dispersion of a solute in a stream of solvent can be used to measure molecular diffusion. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, A225 (1954), 473–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    W.R. Young and S. Jones, Shear dispersion. Phys. Fluids, A3 (1991), 1087–1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© JJIAM Publishing Committee 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. N. Mercer
    • 1
  • A. J. Roberts
    • 2
  1. 1.Mathematics Department, University College, Australian Defence Force AcademyUniversity of New South WalesCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.Mathematics DepartmentUniversity of Southern QueenslandToowoombaAustralia

Personalised recommendations