Wetlands

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 372–382

Soil disturbance, flood management, and riparian woody plant establishment in the Rio Grande floodplain

  • John P. Taylor
  • David B. Wester
  • Loren M. Smith
Article

Abstract

The exotic saltcedar (Tamarix ramosissima) has become the dominant woody plant in many riparian systems in the southwestern United States. We evaluated the effects of saltcedar clearing and overbank river flooding on recruitment of cottonwood (Populus fremontii) and saltcedar vegetation in the Rio Grande floodplain of central New Mexico, USA in 1993 and 1994. Overbank flooding coincided with the natural river hydrograph. After two seasons of growth, cleared areas supported more 1993 cohort cotton-woods and saltcedar than uncleared controlled areas. There were no differences between cleared and uncleared areas for the 1994 cohort after one growing season. Although there was a 2-week difference in the date of peak river flows between 1993 and 1994, similar seedling densities of both species were recorded for both years. The descending limb of the 1993 hydrograph was more gradual than the 1994 hydrograph, however, resulting in a higher survival rate of 1993 seedlings. Soil texture, soil salinity, elevation, and soil moisture data were collected from all plots and compared with seedling densities for each seedling sample date. Elevation and soil moisture indices were the most influential variables on seedling density. Decreasing soil moisture variables resulted in consistent seedling mortality for all species in cleared and uncleared plots for both cohorts. Secondary channels developed as a result of vegetative clearing where natural river fluvial processes provided topographic relief and sediment deposition for seedling establishment. Greater densities of cottonwoods and coyote willows (Salix exigua) were found on these deposits compared with remaining portions of cleared plots. Saltcedar clearing in conjunction with peak river flows in late May or early June encourages recruitment of native riparian plants, particularly along sand deposits created as a result of secondary channel development. Receding flows correlated with a receding water-table level of about 2 cm/day enhances native seedling densities relative to saltcedar.

Key Words

saltcedar Tamarix ramosissima cottonwood Populus fremontii Rio Grande floodplain recruitment overbank flooding soil disturbance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Anderson, B. W. 1989. Research as an integral part of revegetation projects. p. 413–419.In Proceedings of the California Riparian Systems Conference, Berkley, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  2. Blom, C. W. P. M. and L. A. J. C. Voesenek. 1996. Flooding: the survival strategies of plants. Tree 11:290–295.Google Scholar
  3. Brady, N. C. 1974. Determination of soil class. p. 48–49.In The Nature and Properties of Soils. MacMillan Publishing Company, Inc., New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  4. Bullard, T. F. and S. G. Wells. 1992. Hydrology of the Middle Rio Grande from Velarde to Elephant Butte Reservoir, New Mexico. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA. Resource Publication 179.Google Scholar
  5. Burnham, K. P., D. R. Anderson, and J. L. Laake. 1980. Estimation of density from line transect sampling of biological populations. Wildlife Monograph 72.Google Scholar
  6. Crawford, C. S., A. C. Cully, R. Loutheuser, M. S. Sifuentes, L. H. White, and J. P. Wilber. 1993. Middle Rio Grande ecosystem: bosque biological management plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Albuquerque, NM, USA.Google Scholar
  7. Fenner, P., W. W. Brady, and D. R. Patton. 1984. Observations on seeds and seedlings of Fremont cottonwood. Desert Plants 6:55–58.Google Scholar
  8. Fenner, P., W. W. Brady, and D. R. Patton. 1985. Effects of regulated water flows on regeneration of Fremont cottonwood. Journal of Range Management 38:135–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gee, G. W. and J. W. Bauder. 1986. Particle size analysis. p. 383–412.In A. Klute (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods Second Edition. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, USA.Google Scholar
  10. Gill, J. 1978. Design and Analysis of Experiments in Animal and Medical Sciences, vol. 2. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, USA.Google Scholar
  11. Graf, W. L. 1978. Fluvial adjustments to the spread of tamarisk in the Colorado Plateau region. Geological Society of America Bulletin 89:1491–1501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hartley, H. O. 1950. The maximum f-ratio as a short-cut test for heterogeneity of variances. Biometrika 37:308–312.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hendrickx, J. M. H., B. Baerends, Z. I. Raza, M. Sadig, and A. Chaudhry. 1992. Soil salinity by electromagnetic induction of irrigated land. Soil Science Society of America Journal 56:1933–1941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hink, V. C. and R. D. Ohmart. 1984. Middle Rio Grande biological survey. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Albuquerque, NM, USA.Google Scholar
  15. Hochberg, Y. and A. C. Tamhane. 1987. Multiple Comparison Procedures. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Horton, J. S. 1960. Use of a root plow in clearing tamarisk stands. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ft. Collins, CO, USA. Research Note 50.Google Scholar
  17. Horton, J. S. 1977. The development and perpetuation of the permanent tamarisk type in the phreatophyte zone of the southwest. U. S. Department of Agriculture, U. S. Forest Service General Technical Report RM 43:124–127.Google Scholar
  18. Horton, J. S., F. C. Mounts, and J. M. Kraft. 1960. Seed germination and seedling establishment of phreatophyte species. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ft. Collins, CO, USA. Paper No. 48.Google Scholar
  19. Howe, W. H. and F. L. Knopf 1991. On the imminent decline of Rio Grande cottonwoods in central New Mexico. Southwestern Naturalist 36:218–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnson, W. C., R. L. Burgess, and W. R. Keammerer. 1976. Forest overstory vegetation and environment on the Missouri River floodplain in North Dakota. Ecological Monographs 46:59–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kirk, R. 1982. Experimental Design Procedures for Behavior Sciences, 2nd ed. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Belmont, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  22. Knighton, D. 1984. Fluvial Forms and Processes. Edward Arnold Publishers, Ltd. Baltimore, MD, USA.Google Scholar
  23. Mahoney, J. M. and S. B. Rood. 1991a. A device for studying the influence of declining water table on poplar growth and survival. Tree Physiology 8:305–314.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mahoney, J. M. and S. B. Rood. 1991b. A model for assessing the effects of altered river flows on the recruitment of riparian cottonwoods. p. 228–232.In S. B. Rood and J. M. Mahoney, (eds.) The Biology and Management of Southern Alberta’s Cottonwoods. University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada.Google Scholar
  25. Mahoney, J. M. and S. B. Rood. 1992. Response of a hybrid poplar to water table decline in different substrates. Forest Ecology and Management 54:141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mauchley, J. W. 1940. Significance test for sphericity of a normal n-variate distribution. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 11:204–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Robinson, T. W. 1965. Introduction, spread, and area extent of salt cedar (Tamarix) in the western states. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 491-A.Google Scholar
  28. Scott, M. L., M. A. Wondzell, and G. T. Auble. 1993. Hydrograph characteristics relevant to the establishment and growth of western riparian vegetation. p. 237–246.In H. J. Morel-Seytoux. (ed.) Annual American Geophysical Union Hydrology Days. Hydrology Days Publications, Atherton, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  29. Shafroth, P. B., J. M. Friedman, and L. S. Ischinger. 1995. Effects of salinity on establishment ofPopulus fremontii (cottonwood) andTamarix ramosissima (saltcedar) in southwestern United States. Great Basin Naturalist 55:58–65.Google Scholar
  30. Shapiro, S. S. and M. B. Wilk. 1965. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Bometrika 52:591–611.Google Scholar
  31. Sheets, K. R., J. P. Taylor, and J. M. H. Hendrickx. 1994. Rapid salinity mapping by electromagnetic induction for determining riparian restoration potential. Restoration Ecology 2:242–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Siegel, R. S. and J. H. Brock. 1990. Germination requirements of key southwestern woody riparian species. Desert Plants 10:3–8.Google Scholar
  33. Szaro, R. C. 1989. Riparian forest and scrubland community types of Arizona and New Mexico. Desert Plants 9:69–139.Google Scholar
  34. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. 1992. Reclamation’s strategic plan. U. S. Department of the Interior. Bureau of Reclamation. Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  35. U. S. Bureau of Reclaination. 1993. Albuquerque projects office annual operating plan. U. S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation. Albuquerque, NM, USA.Google Scholar
  36. U. S. Bureau of Reclamation. 1994. Report to the Rio Grande compact commission. U. S. Department of the Interior. Bureau of Reclamation. Albuquerque, NM, USA.Google Scholar
  37. Werner, P. A. 1979. Competition and coexistence of similar species. p. 287–310.in O. T. Solbrig, S. Jain, G. B. Johnson, and P. H. Raven, (eds.) Topics in Plant Population Biology. Columbia University Press, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • John P. Taylor
    • 1
  • David B. Wester
    • 2
  • Loren M. Smith
    • 2
  1. 1.U. S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceSocorroUSA
  2. 2.Department of Range, Wildlife, and Fisheries ManagementTexas Tech UniversityLubbockUSA

Personalised recommendations