Wetlands

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 365–371 | Cite as

The seed banks of a southern Appalachian fen and an adjacent degraded wetland

  • Irene M. Rossell
  • Carolyn L. Wells
Article
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:

Abstract

Bogs and fens are rare communities in the southern Appalachians of the USA. Many have been degraded, and little ecological information beyond cursory floral inventories is available to help guide conservation and restoration efforts. The seedling emergence technique was used to examine the soil seed banks of open and closed canopy regions of a southern mountain fen in North Carolina. We also examined the seed bank of an adjoining portion of the floodplain, which had been drained and cleared for a golf fairway and is now slated for restoration. A total of 32 taxa emerged, with graminoids (particularlyJuncus spp.) dominating all three seed banks. Seedlings were assigned to one of five plant types: woody, rush, sedge, grass, or forb. Significantly more woody seedlings emerged in soils from the closed canopy fen than in soils from the other two areas. Most rush seedlings emerged in open canopy fen soils, more sedge and forb seedlings emerged in floodplain soils, and more grass seedlings emerged in floodplain soils than in closed canopy fen soils. A discriminant function analysis separated the open canopy fen from the closed canopy fen and floodplain by seedlings of woody plants and rushes. The floodplain was separated from the open and closed regions of the fen by sedge and grass seedlings. These patterns in seed bank composition bore little similarity to the standing vegetation in the three areas. Restoration activities planned for the floodplain are intended to restore its hydrology and microtopography, which will strongly influence recruitment from the seed bank and surrounding seed sources.

Key Words

southern Appalachians fen floodplain seed bank wetland restoration 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Bierzychudek, P. 1982. Life histories and demography of shade-tolcrant temperate forest herbs: a review, New Phytologist 90:757–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, D. 1992. Estimating the composition of a forest seed bank: a comparison of the seed extraction and seedling emergence methods. Canadian Journal of Botany 70:1603–1612.Google Scholar
  3. Golet, F. C. 1969. Growth of muck-hardwoods in a New York waterfowl impoundment. M.S. Thesis. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  4. Hanlon, T. J., C. E. Williams, and W. J. Moriarity. 1998. Species composition of soil seed banks of Allegheny Plateau riparian forests. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 125:199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Leck, M. A. 1989. Wetland seed banks. p. 283–305.In M. A. Leck, V. T. Parker, and R. L. Simpson (eds.) Ecology of Soil Seed Banks. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  6. McGee, A. and M. C. Feller. 1993. Seed banks of forested and disturbed soils in southwestern British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Botany 71:1574–1583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. McGraw, J. B. 1987. Seed bank properties of an Appalachian sphagnum bog and a model of the depth distribution of viable seeds. Canadian Journal of Botany 65:2028–2035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Moore, J. M. and R. W. Wein. 1977. Viable seed populations by soil depth and potential site recolonization after disturbance. Canadian Journal of Botany 55:2408–2412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Moorhead, K. K. and I. M. Rossell. 1998. Southern mountain fens. p. 379–403.In M. G. Messina and W. H. Connor (eds.) Southern Forested Wetlands: Ecology and Management. CRC/Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, USA.Google Scholar
  10. Paratley, R. D. and T. J. Fahey. 1986. Vegetation-environment relations in a conifer swamp in central New York. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 113:357–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Parker, V. T. and M. A. Leck. 1985. Relationships of seed banks to plant distribution patterns in a freshwater tidal wetland. American Journal of Botany 72:161–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Poiani, K. A. and P. M. Dixon, 1995. Seed banks of Carolina bays: potential contributions from surrounding landscape vegetation. American Midland Naturalist 134:140–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Poiani, K. A. and W. C. Johnson. 1988. Evaluation of the emergence method in estimating the seed bank composition of prairie wetlands. Aquatic Botany 32:91–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Radford, A. E., H. E. Ahles, and C. R. Bell. 1968. Manual of the Flora of the Carolinas. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.Google Scholar
  15. Rossell, C. R., Jr., I. M. Rossell, J. W. Petranka, and K. K. Moorhead. In press. Characteristics of a partially disturbed southern Appalachian forest-gap bog complex Virginia Museum of Natural History, Martinsville, VA, USA. Special Publication No. 3.Google Scholar
  16. SAS Institute, Inc. 1990. SAS procedures guide. Version 6, 3rd edition. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
  17. Schafale, M. P. and A. S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina. 3rd Approximation, North Carolina Natural Heritage Program. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Raleigh, NC, USA.Google Scholar
  18. Schneider, R. L. and R. R. Sharitz, 1986. Seed bank dynamics in a southeastern riverine swamp. American Journal of Botany 73: 1022–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tabachnik, B. G. and L. S. Fidell. 1989. Using Multivariate Statisties. 2nd ed. Harper & Row Publishers, Inc., NY, USA.Google Scholar
  20. Titus, J. H. 1991. Seed bank of a hardwood floodplain swamp in Florida. Castanea 56:117–127.Google Scholar
  21. United States Department of Agriculture. 1995. Preliminary draft soil survey of Graham County, North Carolina. Natural Resources Conservation Service, Asheville, NC, USA.Google Scholar
  22. van der Valk, A. G. and C. B. Davis. 1976. The seed banks of prairie glacial marshes. Canadian Journal of Botany 54:1832–1838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. van der Valk, A. G., R. L. Pederson and C. B. Davis. 1992. Restoration and creation of freshwater wetlands using seed banks. Wetlands Ecology and Management 1:191–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. van der Valk, A. G. and J. T. A. Verhoeven. 1988. Potential role of seed banks and understory species in restoring quaking fens from floating forests. Vegetatio 76:3–13.Google Scholar
  25. Weakley, A. S. and M. P. Schafale. 1994. Non-alluvial wetlands of the southern Blue Ridge-diversity in a threatened ecosystem. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 77:359–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Williams, B. K. 1983. Some observations on the use of discriminant analysis in ecology. Ecology 64:1283–1291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wisheu, I. C. and P. A. Keddy. 1991. Seed banks of a rare wetland plant community: distribution patterns and effects of human-induced disturbance. Journal of Vegetation Science 2:181–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Irene M. Rossell
    • 1
  • Carolyn L. Wells
    • 1
  1. 1.Environmental Studies ProgramUniversity of North Carolina at AshevilleAshevilleUSA

Personalised recommendations