, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 255–261 | Cite as

Seed bank composition of a northeastern U. S. tussock swamp

  • Shannon L. LaDeau
  • Aaron M. EllisonEmail author


A seedling and sporeling emergence assay was conducted on 50 soil cores taken from withinCarex stricta tussocks (intra-tussock) and from paired, adjacentinter-tussock areas in the Hawkins Conservation Area, South Hadley, Massachusetts, USA, to test the hypothesis that local heterogeneity in water levels alters seed bank composition and subsequent seedling emergence patterns. Soil cores were sliced into 2.5-cm-thick sections and split into flooded and drawn-down treatments. Germination of buried seeds and spores was assessed in these treatments under greenhouse conditions for 6 months. Eighteen species emerged from both treatments combined: 17 frominter-tussock samples and 12 fromintra-tussock samples. Pooled across sample depths and watering treatments, more species of grasses, forbs (exclusive ofImpatiens capensis), and woody plants germinated fromintra-tussock samples, while more pteridophytes germinated from theinter-tussock samples. Emergence of pteridophytes, grasses, and forbs was associated significantly with sample depth. More pteridophytes germinated from samples close to the swamp surface, while grasses and forbs were most abundant in samples 10–20 cm below the surface. In the drawn-down treatment, pteridophyte and forb seedlings were more plentiful frominter-tussock samples. In contrast, more forb seedlings emerged fromintra-tussock samples in the flooded treatment. This variation in forb emergence seems to reflect differences in species composition within and between tussocks. Twenty-two species occurred in the standing vegetation of the study area, but only nine of these also occurred in the seed bank. The composition of standing vegetation atop and between tussocks did not differ significantly. Grasses, which dominated the seed bank, were absent from standing vegetation. Grasses clearly represent a persistent population of seeds in the seed bank, while forbs are more transient within the seed bank. The depth-stratified species composition of the seed bank also suggests patterns of temporal succession in the aboveground vegetation of this New England tussock swamp.

Key Words

Carex stricta Massachusetts seed bank tussock swamp 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Baskin, C. C. and J. M. Baskin. 1998. Seeds: Ecology, Biogeography, and Evolution of Dormancy and Germination. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  2. Box, G. E. P. and D. R. Cox. 1964. An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 26:211–243.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, S. C. and B. L. Bedford. 1997. Restoration of wetland vegetation with transplanted wetland soil: an experimental study. Wetlands 17:424–437.Google Scholar
  4. Costello, D. 1936. Tussock meadows in southeastern Wisconsin. Botanical Gazette 97:610–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ellis, R. H. 1991. Longevity of seeds. HortScience 26:1119–1125.Google Scholar
  6. Ellison, A. M. and B. L. Bedford. 1995. Response of a wetland vascular plant community to disturbance: a simulation study. Ecological Applications 5:109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Galinato, M. I. and A. G. van der Valk. 1986. Seed germination traits of annuals and emergents recruited during draw-downs in the Delta Marsh, Manitoba, Canada. Aquatic Botany 26:89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gleason, H. A. and A. Cronquist. 1991. Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada, Second Edition. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  9. Jaccard, P. 1901. Distribution de la flore alpine dans le Bassin des Dranes et dans quelques regions voisines. Bulletin Societe Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles 37:241–272.Google Scholar
  10. Jeltsch, R., S. Milton, W. Dean, and N. Van Rooyen. 1996. Tree spacing and coexistence in semiarid savannas. Journal of Ecology 84:583–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Johnson, L. C., G. R. Shaver, A. E. Giblin, K. J. Nadelhoffer, E. R. Rastetter, J. A. Laundre, and G. L. Murray. 1996. Effects of drainage and temperature on carbon balance of tussock tundra microcosms. Oecologia 108:737–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Keddy, P. and T. Ellis. 1984. Seedling recruitment of eleven wetland plant species along a water level gradient: shared or distinct responses? Canadian Journal of Botany 63:1876–1879.Google Scholar
  13. Leck, M. A. 1979. Germination behavior ofImpatiens capensis Meerb. (Balsaminaceae). Bartonia 46:1–11.Google Scholar
  14. Leck, M. A. 1989. Wetland seed banks. p. 283–308.In M. A. Leck, V. T. Parker, and R. L. Simpson (eds.) Ecology of Soil Seed Banks. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  15. Leck, M. A. and K. J. Graveline. 1979. The seed bank of a freshwater tidal marsh. American Journal of Botany 66:1006–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Leck, M. A. and R. L. Simpson. 1987. Seed bank of a freshwater tidal wetland: turnover and relationship to vegetation change. American Journal of Botany 74:360–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McGraw, J. B. 1987. Seed bank properties of an AppalachianSphagnum bog and a model of the depth distribution of viable seeds. Canadian Journal of Botany 65:2028–2035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rejmánková, E. and M. Rejmánek. 1995. A comparison ofCarex runssoroensis fens on Ruwenzori Mountains and Mount Elgon, Uganda. Biotropica 27:37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Roach, D. A. 1983. Buried seed and standing vegetation in two adjacent tundra habitats, northern Alaska. Oecologia 60:359–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rydin, H. 1986. Competition and niche separation inSphagnum. Canadian Journal of Botany 64:1817–1824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tilman, D. 1982. Resource Competition and Community Structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.Google Scholar
  22. Titus, J. H. 1990. Microtopography and woody plant regeneration in a hardwood floodplain swamp in Florida. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 117:429–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. van der Valk, A. G. 1981. Succession in wetlands: a Gleasonian approach. Ecology 62:688–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. van der Valk, A. G. and C. B. Davis. 1978. The role of seed banks in the vegetation dynamics of prairie glacial marshes. Ecology 59:322–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. van der Valk, A. G. and T. R. Rosburg. 1997. Seed bank composition along a phosphorus gradient in the northern Florida Everglades. Wetlands 17:228–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Vivian-Smith, G. 1997. Microtopographic heterogencity and floristic diversity in experimental wetland communities. Journal of Ecology 85:71–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Vivian-Smith, G. and S. Handel. 1996. Freshwater wetland restoration of an abandoned sand mine: seed bank recruitment dynamics and plant colonization. Wetlands 16:185–196.Google Scholar
  28. Watt, A. S. 1947. Pattern and proceses in the plant community. Journal of Ecology 35:1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Weiher, E., I. Wisheu, P. Keddy, and D. Moore. 1996. Establishment, persistence, and management implications of experimental wetland plant communities. Wetlands 16:208–218.Google Scholar
  30. Yapp, R. H. 1909. On stratification in the vegetation of a marsh, and its relationship to evaporation and temperature. Annals of Botany, Old Series 23:275–319.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological Sciences and Program in Environmental StudiesMount Holyoke CollegeSouth HadleyUSA

Personalised recommendations