, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 1–12 | Cite as

Consequences of habitat loss and fragmentation for wetland amphibian assemblages

  • Richard M. Lehtinen
  • Susan M. Galatowitsch
  • John R. Tester


Landscape-level variables operating at multiple spatial scales likely influence wetland amphibian assemblages but have not been investigated in detail. We examined the significance of habitat loss and fragmentation, as well as selected within-wetland conditions, affecting amphibian assemblages in twenty-one glacial marshes. Wetlands were located within urban and agricultural regions of central and southwestern Minnesota, USA and were distributed across two ecoregions: tallgrass prairie and northern hardwood forest. We surveyed amphibian assemblages and used a geographic information system to quantify land-use variables at three scales: 500, 1000, and 2500 m. Ten species of amphibians were detected, the most abundant beingRana pipiens, Ambystoma tigrinum, andBufo americanus. Amphibian species richness was lower with greater wetland isolation and road density at all spatial scales in both ecoregions. Amphibian species richness also had a negative relationship with the proportion of urban land-use at all spatial scales in the hardwood forest ecoregion, and species richness was greater in wetlands with fish andAmbystoma tigrinum. These biotic relationships are less consistent and more difficult to interpret than are land-use relationships. The data presented here suggest that decreases in landscape connectivity via fragmentation and habitat loss can affect amphibian assemblages, and reversing those landscape changes should be an important part of a regional conservation strategy.

Key Words

amphibians landscape ecology habitat fragmentation metapopulations wetlands Minnesota 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Berven, K. A. 1990. Factors affecting population fluctuations in larval and adult stages of the wood frog (Rana sylvatica). Ecology 71:1599–1608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berven, K. A. and T. A. Grudzien. 1990. Dispersal in the wood frog (Rana sylvatica): implications for genetic population structure. Evolution 44:2047–2056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bishop, C. A. and K. E. Pettit. 1992. Declines in Canadian amphibian populations designing a national monitoring strategy. Canadian Wildlife Service, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Occasional Paper Number 76Google Scholar
  4. Blaustein, A. R., D. B. Wake, and W. P. Sousa. 1994. Amphibian declines: judging stability, persistence, and susceptibility of populations to local and global extinctions. Conservation Biology 8:60–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blaustein, A. R., P. D. Hoffman, J. M. Kiesecken, and J. B. Hays. 1996. DNA repair activity and resistance to solar UV-B radiation in eggs of the red-legged frog. Conservation Biology 10:1398–1402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolger, D. T., T. A. Scott, and J. T. Rotenberry. 1997. Breeding bird abundance in an urbanizing landscape in coastal southern California. Conservation Biology 11:406–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradford, D. F. 1991. Mass mortality and extinction in a high-elevation population ofRana muscosa. Journal of Herpetology 25:174–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caldwell, J. P., J. H. Thorp, and T. O. Jervey. 1980. Predator-prey relationships among larval dragonflies, salamanders, and frogs. Oecologica (Berl.) 46:285–289.Google Scholar
  9. Conant, R. and J. T. Collins 1991. A Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians of Eastern and Central North America. 3rd ed. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA, USA.Google Scholar
  10. Dahl, T. E. and C. E. Johnson. 1991. Wetland status and trends in the conterminous United States mid 1970’s to mid-1980’s. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington DC, USA.Google Scholar
  11. Detenbeck, N. E., S. M. Galatowitsch, J. Atkinson, and H. Ball. 1999. Evaluating perturbations and developing restoration strategics for inland wetlands in the Great Lakes Basin. Wetlands 19: (in press).Google Scholar
  12. Environmental Systems Research Institute. 1996. ARC/INFO User’s Manual, Release 7.1. ESRI, Redlands, CA.Google Scholar
  13. Fahrig, L. and G. Merriam. 1994. Conservation of fragmented populations. Conservation Biology 8:50–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fahrig, L., J. H. Pedlar, S. H. Pope, P. D. Taylor, and J. F. Wegner. 1995. Effect of road traffic on amphibian density. Biological Conservation 73:177–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Findlay, C. S. and Houlahan, J. 1997. Anthropogenic correlates of species richness in southeastern Ontario wetlands. Conservation Biology 11:1000–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fisher, R. N. and H. B. Shaffer. 1996. The decline of amphibians in California’s Great Central Valley. Conservation Biology 10:1387–1397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Galatowitsch, S. M. and A. G. van der Valk. 1996. Characteristics of recently restored wetlands in the prairie pothole region. Wetlands 16:75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Galatowitsch, S. M., A. G. van der Valk, and R. A. Budelsky. 1998. Decision-making for prairic wetland restoration. Great Plains Research (in press).Google Scholar
  19. Gerhardt, H. C., M. B. Ptacek, L. Barnett, and K. G. Torke. 1994. Hybridization in the diploid-tetraploid treefrogsHyla chrysocelis andHyla versicolor. Copeia 1994:51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gill, D. E. 1978. The metapopulation ecology of the red-spotted newt,Notophthalmus viridescens (Rafinesque). Ecological Monographs 48:145–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hanski, I. and D. Simberloff. 1997. The metapopulation approach, its history, conceptual domain, and application to conservation. p. 5–26.In I. A. Hanski and M. E. Gilpin (eds.) Metapopulation Biology. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harrison, S. 1994. Metapopulations and conservation. p. 111–128.In P. J. Edwards, R. M. May, and N. R. Webb (eds.) Large-Scale Ecology and Conservation Biology. Blackwell Science, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  23. Hayes, M. P. and M. R. Jennings. 1986. Decline of ranid frog species in western North America: are bullfrogs (Rana catebeiana) responsible? Journal of Herpetology 20:490–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hecnar, S. J. and R. T. M’Closkey. 1996. Regional dynamics and the status of amphibians. Ecology 77(7): 2091–2097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hecnar, S. J. and R. T. M’Closkey. 1997a. Spatial scale and determination of species status of the green frog. Conservation Biology 11:670–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hecnar, S. J. and R. T. M’Closkey. 1997b. The effects of predatory fish on amphibian species richness and distribution. Biological Conservation 79:123–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Held, J. W. and J. J. Peterka. 1974. Age, growth, and food habits of the fathead minnow,Pimephales promelas, in North Dakota saline lakes. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 103:743–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hollands, G. G. 1987. Hydrogeologic classification of wetlands in glaciated regions. National Wetlands Newsletter 9:6–9.Google Scholar
  29. Hosmer, D. W. and S. Lemeshow. 1989. Applied Logistic Regression. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  30. Karns, D. R. 1986. Field herpetology: methods for the study of amphibians and reptiles in Minnesota. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Bell Museum of Natural History Occasional Paper #18.Google Scholar
  31. Karns, D. R. 1992. Effects of acidic bog habitats on amphibian reproduction in a northern Minnesota peatland. Journal of Herpetology 26:401–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kats, L. B., J. W. Petranka, and A. Sih. 1988. Antipredator defenses and the persistence of amphibian larvae with fishes. Ecology 69:1865–1870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kiesecker, J. M. and A. R. Blaustein. 1997. Influences of egg laying behavior on pathogenic infection of amphibian eggs. Conservation Biology 11:214–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Laan, R. and B. Verboom. 1990. Effects of pool size and isolation on amphibian communities. Biological Conservation 54:251–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lannoo, M. J., K. Lang, T. Waltz, and G. S. Phillips. 1994. An altered amphibian assemblage. Dickinson County, Iowa, 70 years after Frank Blanchard’s survey. American Midland Naturalist 131:311–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Laurance, W. F., K. R. McDonald, and R. Speare. 1996. Epidemic disease and the catastrophic decline of Australian rain forest frogs. Conservation Biology 10:406–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Levins, R. 1969. Some genetic and demographic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America 15:237–240.Google Scholar
  38. Long, L. E., L. S. Saylor, and M. E. Soulé. 1995. A pH/UV-B synergism in amphibians. Conservation Biology 9:1301–1303.Google Scholar
  39. Merriam, G., M. Kozakiewicz, E. Tsuchiya, and K. Hawley. 1989. Barriers as boundaries for metapopulations and demes ofPeromyscus leucopus in farm landscapes. Landscape Ecology 2:227–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Minton, S. A., Jr. 1968. The fate of amphibians and reptiles in a suburban area. Journal of Herpetology 2:113–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Morin, P. J. and E. A. Johnson. 1988. Experimental studies of asymmetrical competition among anurans. Oikos 53:398–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Moyle, P. B. 1973. Effects of introduced bullfrogs,Rana catesbeiana, on the native frogs of the San Joaquin valley, California. Copeia 1973:18–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Oldfield, B. and J. J. Moriarty. 1994. Amphibians and Reptiles Native to Minnesota. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, USA.Google Scholar
  44. Omernik, J. M. 1987. Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 77:118–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pechmann, J. H. K., D. E. Scott, J. W. Gibbons, and R. D. Semlitsch. 1989. Influence of wetland hydroperiod on diversity and abundance of metamorphosing juvenile amphibians. Wetlands Ecology and Management 1:3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pechmann, J. H. K., D. E. Scott, R. D. Semlitsch, J. P. Caldwell, L. J. Vitt, and J. W. Gibbons. 1991. Declining amphibian populations: the problem of separating human impacts from natural fluctuations. Science 253:892–895.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Peterka, J. J. 1989. Fishes in northern prairie wetlands. p. 302–315.In A. van der Valk (ed.) Northern Prairie Wetlands. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, USA.Google Scholar
  48. Peterson, A. G., C. M. Bull, and L. M. Wheeler. 1992. Habitat choice and predator avoidance in tadpoles. Journal of Herpetology 26:142–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Peterson, C. R. and M. E. Doreas. 1994. Automated data acquisition. p. 47–57.In R.W. Heyer, M.A. Donnelly, R.W. McDiarmid, L.C. Hayek, and M.S. Foster (eds.) Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Amphibians. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC, USA.Google Scholar
  50. Pierce, T. K. 1985. Acid tolerance in amphibians. BioScience 35:239–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Reh, W. and A. Seitz. 1990. The influence of land use on the genetic structure of populations of the common frogRana temporaria. Biological Conservation 54:239–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Richter, K. O. and A. L. Azous. 1995. Amphibian occurrence and wetland characteristics in the Puget Sound basin. Wetlands 15:305–312.Google Scholar
  53. Sadinski, W. J. and W. A. Dunson. 1992. A multilevel study of effects of low pH on amphibians of temporary ponds. Journal of Herpetology 26:413–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. SAS. 1996. Release 6.12. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
  55. Sjörgren, P. 1991. Extinction and isolation gradients in metapopulations: the case of the pool frog (Rana lessonae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 42:135–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sjögren, P. 1994. Distribution and extinction patterns within a northern metapopulation of the pool frog,Rana lessonae. Ecology 75:1357–1367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Skelly, D. K. 1996. Pond drying, predators, and the distribution ofPseudacris tadpoles. Copeia 1996:599–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Skelly, D. K. 1997. Tadpole communities. American Scientist 85:36–45.Google Scholar
  59. Statistix. 1996. Statistix for Windows user’s manual. Analytical Software, Tallahassee, FL, USA.Google Scholar
  60. Stewart, R. E. and H. A. Kantrud. 1971. Classification of natural ponds and lakes in the glaciated prairie region. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Research Publication 92.Google Scholar
  61. Taylor, P. D., L. Fahrig, K. Henein, and G. Merriam. 1993. Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos 68:571–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tejedo, M. 1993. Size-dependent vulnerability and behavioral responses of tadpoles of two anuran species to beetle larvae predators. Herpetologica 49:287–294.Google Scholar
  63. Tilman, D., R. May, C. Lehman, and M. Nowak. 1994. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371:65–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Trexler, J. C. and J. Travis. 1993. Nontraditional regression analyses. Ecology 74:1629–1637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Turner, F. B. 1960. Population structure and dynamics of the western spotted frog. Ecological Monographs 30:251–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. van Dorp, D. and P. F. M. Opdam. 1987. Effects of patch size, isolation, and regional abundance on forest bird communities. Landscape Ecology 1:59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Verboom, J., A. Schotman, P. Opdam, and J. A. J. Metz. 1991. European nuthatch metapopulations in a fragmented agricultural landscape. Oikos 61:149–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wake, D. B. 1991. Declining amphibian populations. Science 253:860.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Werner, E. E. 1991. Nonlethal effects of a predator on competitive interactions between two anuran larvae. Ecology 72:1709–1720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wik, D. 1996. Sampling larval amphibians by bottletrap: development of an activity trap system. Third Annual Meeting of the North American Amphibian Monitoring Program, Google Scholar
  71. Winter, T.C. 1988. Conceptual framework for assessment of cumulative impacts on the hydrology of non-tidal wetlands. Environmental Management 12:605–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wyman, R. L. 1988. Soil acidity and moisture and the distribution of amphibians in five forests of southcentral New York. Copeia 1988:394–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard M. Lehtinen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Susan M. Galatowitsch
    • 1
  • John R. Tester
    • 2
  1. 1.Departments of Horticultural Science and Landscape ArchitectureUniversity of MinnesotaSt. PaulUSA
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of MinnesotaSt. PaulUSA

Personalised recommendations