Advertisement

Journal of Medical Toxicology

, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 64–67 | Cite as

Bacillus spores in the mail: “Ironing” out the anthrax problem

  • Marc R. RobergeEmail author
Toxicology Investigations

Abstract

Introduction

Following a terrorist release ofBacillus anthracis spores through the U.S. Postal Service, it was suggested that decontamination of spores in mail envelopes could be accomplished at home by utilizing the steam heat from a household iron. This study investigated the use of a standard household iron, in a dry heat mode, for sterilizing mail envelopes laced with bacterial spores.

Methods

TheBacillus subtilis var. niger spore, a more heat resistant spore, was used as a surrogate forB. Anthracis spores. Standard mail envelopes containing 2.1 × 106 spores were sealed and subjected to various levels of dry heat from a standard household iron for periods of 5, 10, and 15 minutes. Envelope contents were then cultured in soy broth for seven days to detect any bacterial growth, and in addition envelopes and contents were visually inspected for evidence of damage and readability of words.

Results

At a temperature range of 160.01°C –204.5°C for a period of 5 minutes,B. subtilis var. niger spores were effectively sterilized and, at 7 days, no bacterial growth was observed. No gross evidence of envelope damage was observed and the legibility of words was not compromised.

Conclusions

Dry heat from a common household iron is capable of destroyingBacillus spores in mailing envelopes without grossly altering the envelope or affecting the legibility of words.

Keywords

bacillussubtilis var. niger anthrax household iron mail envelopes 

References

  1. 1.
    Dewan PK, Fry AM, Laserson K, Tierney BC, Quinn CP, et al: Inhalational anthrax outbreak among postal workers, Washington, D.C., 2001. Emerg Infect Dis2002; 8:1066–1072.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cymet TC, Kerkvliet GJ: What is the true number of victims of the postal Anthrax attack of 2001? (Letter) J American Osteopath Assoc2004; 104:452.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alibek K: Combating Terrorism: Assessing the Threat of a Biological Weapons Attack. House Subcommittee on National Security, Veterans Affairs, and International Relations 12 October2001. www.NewsMax.com/archives/articles/2002/10/21/204923.shtmlGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Emery D: “Should I iron my mail to prevent Anthrax?” 17 October2001. www.urbanlegends.about.com/library/weekly/ aa101701a.htnGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Strauss V: Anthrax facts: What it is, what to do. The Washington Post 24 October2001; A15, The Washington Post Company, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mikkelson B: The Steam Genie. 16 October2001. www.snopes.com/rumors/iron.htnGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ambrose CT: Osler and the infected letter. Emerg Infect Dis2005; 11:1–9.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Anonymous: Civil Defense Perspectives: Anthrax, Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine, www.oism.org/cdp/ nov2001.htnlGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Whitney EAS, Beatty ME, Taylor Jr TH, Weyant R, Sobel J, Arduino MJ, Ashford DA: Inactivation of Bacillus anthracis spores. Emerg Inf Dis2003; 9:623–627Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Whitis M: Mail handling in the age of bioterrorism. Accessed at www.freelabs.com/~whitis/biosafety/mail_handling.htmlGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brusch CW: Some biological and physical factors in dry heat sterilization: a general review. Life Sci Space Res1964; 2:357–371.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    How to recognize and handle a suspicious package or envelope. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA www.bt.cdc.gov/agent/anthrax/mail/suspiciouspackages.aspGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American College of Medical Toxicology 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pittsburgh

Personalised recommendations