, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 10–15 | Cite as

Influence of soil oxidation-reduction potential and salinity on nutrition, N-15 uptake, and growth ofSpartina patens

  • B. K. Bandyopadhyay
  • S. R. Pezeshki
  • R. D. DeLaune
  • C. W. Lindau


Nutrition, photosynthesis, and growth responses ofSpartina patens to various intensities of sediment reduction (redox potentials, Eh) ranging between — 115 mV to +475 mV and/or salinity of < 1 and 6 ppt were evaluated under controiled environmental conditions. Reduction in soil Eh to — 115 mV seemed to have little effect on net photosynthesis, but 6 ppt salinity combined with low Eh significantly decreased net photosynthesis, indicating the adverse effects of combined low Eh and salinity on gas exchange functioning. The treatments showed striking differences in concentration of nutrients in the plants. In each Eh treatment, N content in the plants was low under 6 ppt salinity compared to the < 1 ppt treatment. N content and N-15 concentration in the plant also decreased as the soil Eh decreased. Data indicated that uptake of N was inhibited by low Eh due to reduced ability of roots to take up nitrogen and/or poor physical growth of roots. Plant Fe and Mn content increased considerably at low Eh treatments. However, salinity did not show consistent influence on Fe and Mn content of tissue. Concentration of K, Ca, Mg, Zn, and Cu in plant tissue was not influenced by Eh or salinity. Root dry weight was significantly decreased in response to lowering of Eh. Within each Eh treatment, root dry weight was not influenced by salinity except in the aerated (high Eh) treatment. This finding indicates that under salinity concentrations tested, soil hypoxia is the dominant factor controlling nutrient uptake and growth ofSpartina patens. Results suggest that in submerged coastal environments, such as the Mississipppi River deltaic plain, increased flooding and soil redox conditions seem to be the primary stress factors affecting productivity ofSpartina patens unless salinity levels substantially exceed the present levels. Another primary reason for vegetation stress is the reduced uptake of nitrogen as a result of reduction in soil Eh.

Key words

Flood-stress salt-stress nitrogen uptake plant gas exchange photosynthesis stomatal conductance hypoxia 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Armstrong W. 1979. Aeration in higher plants. Advances in Botanical Research 7: 225–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atwell, B.J., C.J., Thompson, H. Greenway, G. Wards, and I. Waters. 1985. A study of the impaired growth of roots ofZea mays seedlings at low oxygen concentrations. Plant Cell and Environment 8: 179–188.Google Scholar
  3. Ball, M.C. and G. D. Farquhar. 1984. Photosynthetic and stomatal responses to two mangrove species to long-term salinity and humidity conditions. Plant Physiology 74:1–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandyopadhyay, B.K. and H.S. Sen. 1989. Studies on damage of crop and its nutritional behavious following excess irrigation/rain in coastal heavy textured saline soil and its control. Journal Indian Society of Soil Science 37: 818–821.Google Scholar
  5. Berry, J.A. and W.J.S. Downton. 1982. Environmental regulation of photosynthesis. p. 263–343.In D. Govindjee (ed.) Photosynthesis Development, Carbon Metabolism and Plant Productivity. Academic Press, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  6. Bradford, K.J. and S.F. Yang 1981. Physiological responses of plants to waterlogging. HortScience 16: 25–30.Google Scholar
  7. Caemmerer, S. and G.D. Farquhar. 1981. Some relationship between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves. Planta 153:376–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cavalieri, A.J. and A.H.C. Huang. 1981. Accumulation of proline and glycinebetaine inSpartina alternifora in response to NaCl and nitrogen in the marsh. Oecologia 49: 224–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chimiklis, P.E. and E.P. Karlander. 1973. Light and calcium interactien in Chlorella inhibited by sodium chloride. Plant Physiology 51:48–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DeLaune, R.D. and S.R. Pezeshki. 1988. Relationship of mineral nutrients to growth ofSpartina alterniflora in Louisiana salt marshes. northeast Gulf Science 10:55–60.Google Scholar
  11. DeLaune, R.D., S.R. Pezeshki, and J.H. Pardue, 1990. An oxidationreduction buffer for evaluating the physiological response of plants to root oxygen stress. Environmental Experimental Botany 30: 243–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DeLaune, R.D., C.J. Smith, and M.D. Tolley. 1983. Relationship of marsh elevation, redox potential and sulphide toSpartina alterniflora productivity. Soil Science Society American Journal 47: 930–935.Google Scholar
  13. DeLaune, R.D., C.J. Smith, and M.D. Tolley. 1984. The effect of sediment redox potential on nitrogen uptake, anaerobic root respiration and growth ofSpartina alterniflora Loisel. Aquatic Botany 18: 223–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Downton, W.J.S., W.J.R. Grant, and S.P. Robinson. 1985. Photosynthetic and stomatal responses of spinach leaves to salt stress. Plant Physiology 77:85–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Drake, B.G. and J.L. Gallagher. 1984. Osmotic potential and turgor maintenance inSpartina alterniflora. Oecologia (Berl.) 62:368–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Flanagan, L.B. and R.L. Jefferies. 1988. Stomatal limitation of photosynthesis and reduced growth of the halophyte,Plantago maritima L., at high salinity. Plant Cell and Environment 11:239–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gallagher, J.L. 1975 Effect of an ammonium pulse on growth and elemental composition of natural stands ofSpartina alterniflora andJuncus roemerianus. American Journal Botany 62: 644–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gotch, S. and W.H. Patrick, Jr. 1974. Transformation of iron in a waterlogged soil as influenced by redox potential and pH. Proceedings soil science society of America 38: 66–71.Google Scholar
  19. Helal, H.M. and K. Megel. 1981. Interaction between light intensity and NaCl salinity and their effects on growth, CO2 assimilation, and photosynthate conversion in young broad beans. Plant Physiology 67:999–1002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Howes, B.L., R.W. Howarth, J.M. Teal, and I. Valjela. 1981. Oxidation-reduction potentials in a salt marsh: Spatial patterns and interactions with primary production. Limnology Oceanography 26:350–360.Google Scholar
  21. Kozlowski, T.T. 1984. Plant responses to flooding of soil. Bio-Science 34: 162–167.Google Scholar
  22. Kramer, P.J. 1969. Plant and Soil Water Relationships. A Modern Synthesis. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  23. Linthurst, R.A. 1979. The effect of aeration on growth ofSpartina alterniflora Loisel. American Journal of Botany 66: 685–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Linthurst, R.A. and E.D. Seneca. 1981. Aeration, nitrogen and salinity as determinants ofSpartina alterniflora growth response. Esturaries 4:53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Longstreth, D.J., J.A. Bolanos, and J.E. Smith. 1984. Salinity effects of photosynthesis and growth inAlternanthera philoxeroides. Plant Physiology 75:1044–1047.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Longstreth, D.J. and P.S. Nobel. 1979. Salinity effects on leaf anatomy. Consequences for photosynthesis. Plant Physiology 63:700–703.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Makino, A., T. Mae, and A.K. Ohira. 1984. Effect of Nitrogen, phosphorus or potassium on the photosynthesis rate and ribulose-1.5-biphosphate carboxylase content in rice leaves during expansion. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 30: 63–70.Google Scholar
  28. Morris, J.T. 1984. Effects of oxygen and salinity on ammonium uptake bySpartina alterniflora andSpartina patens. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 70: 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Morris, J.T. and J.W. Dacey. 1984. Effects of O2 on ammonium uptake and root respiration bySpartina alterniflora. American Journal of Botany 71: 979–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nestler, J. 1977. Interstitial salinity as a cause of ecophenic variation inSpartina alterniflora. Estuarine Coastal Marine Sciences 5: 707–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Patrick, W.H., Jr. 1960. Nitrate reduction rates in submerged soil as affected by redox potential. 7th International Congress of Soil Science, Madison, WI, USA. Transaction Vol. II–III.5.Google Scholar
  32. Patrick, W.J., Jr. and R.D. DeLaune. 1977. Chemical and biological redox systems affecting nutrient availability in coastal wetlands. Geoscience and Man Vol. XVIII: 131–137.Google Scholar
  33. Patrick, W.H., Jr., R.D. DeLaune, and F.J. Peterson. 1974. Nitrogen utilization by rice using15N depleted ammonium sulphate. Agronomy Journal 66: 819–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Patrick, W.H., Jr. and D.S. Mikkelsen. 1971. Plant nutrient behavior in flooded soil. p. 187–215. In: Fertilizer Technology and Use (2nd edition). Soil Science Socicty of America, Madison, WI, USA.Google Scholar
  35. Pearcy, R.W. and S.L. Ustin. 1984. Effects of salinity on growth and photosynthesis of three California tidal marsh species. Oecologia (Berlin) 62:68–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pezeshki, S.R. and R.D. DeLaune. 1990. Influence of sediment oxidation-reduction potential on root elongation inSpartina patens. Acta Oecologia 11:377–383.Google Scholar
  37. Pezeshki, S.R., R.D. DeLaune, and W.H. Patrick, Jr. 1987. Response ofSpartina patens to increasing levels of salinity in rapidly subsiding marshes of the Mississippi River Deltaic plain. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 24:389–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pezeshki, S.R., S.W. Matthews, and R.D. DeLaune. 1991. Root cortex structure and metabolic responses ofSpartina patens to Soil redox conditions. Environmental and Experimental Botany 31:91–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pezeshki, S.R. and F.J. Sundstrom. 1988 Effect of soil anaerobiosis on photosynthesis ofCapsicum annuum L. Scientia Horticulture 35:91–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pezeshki, S.R. and F.J. Sundstrom. 1988 Effect of soil anaerobiosis on photosynthesis ofCapsicum annuum L. Scientia Horticulture 35: 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sage, R.F. and R.W. Pearcy. 1987. The nitrogen use efficiency of C3 and C4 plants. II. Leaf nitrogen effects on the gas exchange characteristics ofChenopodium album andAmaranthus retroflexus. Plant Physiology 84: 959–963.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Seemann, J.R. and C. Critchley. 1985. Effect of salt stress on growth, ion content, stomatal behavior, and photosynthetic capacity of salt sensitive speciesPhaseolus vulgaris L. Planta 164: 151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Seemann, J.R. and T.D. Sharkey. 1986. Salinity and nitrogen effects on photosynthesis, Ribulose-1,5-biphosphate carboxylase and metabolic pool inPhaseolus vulgaris L. Plant Physiology 82:555–560.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Seemann, J.R., T.D. Sharkey, J. Wang, and C.B. Osmond. 1987 Environmental effects on photosynthesis, nitrogen-use efficiency, and metabolite pools in leaves of sun and shade plants. Plant Physiology 84: 769–802.Google Scholar
  45. Sharkey, T.D. 1985. Photosynthesis in intact leaves of C3 plants: physics, physiology, and rate limitations. Botanical Review 51: 53–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Smart, R.M. and J.W. Barko. 1978. Influence of sediment salinity and nutrients in the physiological ecology of selected saltmarsh plants. Estuarine, Coastal Marine Sciences 7:487–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stolzy, L.H., J. Letey, and T.E. Szuszkicwicz. 1961. Root growth and diffusion rates as function of oxygen concentration. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 14: 55–61.Google Scholar
  48. Valiela, I., J.M. Teal, and W.G. Deuser. 1978. The nature of growth forms in the salt marsh grassSpartina alterniflora. American Naturalist 112: 461–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zapata, F. 1990 Isotope techniques in soil fertility and plant nutrition studies. p. 61–128.In G. Hardarson (ed.) Use of Nuclear Techniques in Studies of Soil-Plant Relationships. I.A.E.A. Training Course Series No.#2, Vienna.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. K. Bandyopadhyay
    • 1
  • S. R. Pezeshki
    • 1
  • R. D. DeLaune
    • 1
  • C. W. Lindau
    • 1
  1. 1.Wetland Biogeochemistry InstituteLouisiana State UniversityBaton Rouge

Personalised recommendations