Wetlands

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 51–65

Nitrogen effects onSpartina foliosa andSalicornia virginica in the salt marsh at Tijuana Estuary, California

  • Jordan D. Covin
  • Joy B. Zedler
Article

Abstract

Nitrogen effects were examined by experimentally enriching plots of pureSpartina foliosa and mixedSpartina-Salicorniavirginica at Tijuana Estuary, California. Even with large inputs of organic nitrogen from sewage spills in 1983, plants responded to experimental urea enrichment. In pure plots, the addition of nitrogen increasedSpartina growth (as measured by total stem length and August biomass) and foliar nitrogen (TKN) concentration. In mixed plots, enrichment had no apparent effect onSpartina but increased the growth ofSalicornia. The experimental removal ofSalicornia from mixed stands increasedSpartina production, but removal ofSpartina did not affectSalicornia. Salicornia is a superior competitor for nitrogen and checks the growth ofSpartina in enriched and unenriched conditions.

Key Words

Nitrogen nutrient limitation salt marsh Spartina 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Broome, S.W., W.W. Woodhouse Jr., and E.D. Seneca. 1975. The relationship of mineral nutrients to growth ofSpartina alterniflora in North Carolina. II. The effects of N, P, and Fe fertilizers. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 39:301–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chalmers, A.G. 1982. Soil dynamics and the productivity ofSpartina alterniflora, p. 231–242.In V.S. Kennedy (ed.) Estuarine Comparisons. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Covin, J.D. 1984. The role of inorganic nitrogen in the growth and distribution ofSpartina foliosa at Tijuana Estuary, California. M.S. Thesis. San Diego State University. 60 p.Google Scholar
  4. Fong, P. 1986. Monitoring and manipulation of phytoplankton dynamics in a southern California estuary. M.S. Thesis. San Diego State University. 105 p.Google Scholar
  5. Gallagher, J.L. 1975. Effect of an ammonium nitrate pulse on the growth and elemental composition of natural stands ofSpartina alterniflora andJuncus roemerianus. Amer. J. Bot. 62:644–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Haines, B.L. and E.L. Dunn. 1976. Growth and resource allocation responses ofSpartina alterniflora L. to three levels of NH4 +−N, Fe, and NaCl in solution culture. Bot. Gaz. 137:224–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hinde, H.P. 1954. The vertical distribution of phanerogams in relation to tide levels. Ecol. Monogr. 24:209–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Howes, B.L., J.W.H. Dacey, and D.D. Goehringer. 1986. Factors controlling the growth form ofSpartina alterniflora: feedbacks between above-ground production, sediment oxidation, nitrogen, and salinity. J. of Ecol. 74:881–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Keeny, D.R. and D.W. Nelson. 1982. Nitrogen-inorganic forms, p. 643–699.In C.A. Blacks and D.D. Evans (eds.) Methods of Soil Analysis. American Society of Agronomy Inc., Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  10. Linthurst, R.A. and E.D. Seneca. 1980. Aeration, nitrogen, and salinity as determinants ofSpartina alterniflora growth responses. Estuaries 4:53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Macdonald, K.B. 1977. Coastal salt marsh vegetation.In M.G. Barbour and J. Major (eds.) Terrestrial Vegetation of California. John Wiley and Sons, New York and London.Google Scholar
  12. Mahall, B.E. and R.B. Park. 1976a. The ecotone betweenSpartina foliosa Trin. andSalicornia virginica L. in salt marshes of northern San Francisco Bay. I. Biomass and Production, J. Ecol. 64:421–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mahall, B.E. and R.B. Park. 1976b. The ecotone betweenSpartinafoliosa Trin. andSalicornia virginica L. in salt marshes of northern San Francisco Bay. II. Soil and water salinity. J. Ecol. 64:793–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mahall, B.E. and R.B. Park. 1976c. The ecotone betweenSpartina foliosa Trin andSalicornia virginica L. in salt marshes of northern san Francisco Bay. III. Soil aeration and tidal immersion. J. Ecol. 64:811–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mendelssohn, I.A. 1979. Nitrogen metabolism in the height forms ofSpartina alterniflora in North Carolina. Ecology 60:574–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Morris, J.T. 1980. The nitrogen uptake kinetics ofSpartina alterniflora in culture. Ecology 61:1114–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Morris, J.T. 1984. Effects of oxygen and salinity on ammonium uptake bySpartina alterniflora Loisel. andSpartina patens (Aiton) Muhl. J. Exper. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 78:87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Onuf, C.P., J.M. Teal, and I. Valiela. 1977. Interactions of nutrients, plant growth, and herbiviory in a mangrove ecosystem. Ecology 58:514–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Patrick, W.H. and R.D. Delaune. 1976. Nitrogen and phosphorus utilization bySpartina alterniflora in a salt marsh in Barataria Bay, Louisiana. Estuarine Coastal Mar. Sci. 4:59–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Piggott, C.D. 1969. Influence of mineral nutrition on the zonation of flowering plants in coastal salt marshes. Symposium of the British Ecological Society 9:25–35.Google Scholar
  21. Purer, E. 1942. Plant ecology of the coastal salt marshlands of San Diego County. Ecol. Monogr. 12:82–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Smart, M.R. and J.W. Barko. 1978. Influence of sediment salinity and nutrients on the physiological ecology of selected salt marsh plants. Estuarine Coastal Mar. Sci. 7:487–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stewart, G.E., J.A. Lee, and T.O. Orebamjo. 1973. Nitrogen metabolism of halophytes. II. Nitrate availability and utilization. New Phytol. 72:539–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stiling, P.D., B.V. Brodbeck, and D.R. Strong. 1982. Foliar nitrogen and larval parasitism as determinants of leaf miner distribution patterns onSpartina alterniflora. Ecol. Ent. 7:447–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Valiela, I. and J.M. Teal. 1974. Nutrient limitation in salt marsh vegetation, p. 547–563.In R.J. Reimold and W.H. Queen (eds.) Ecology of Halophytes. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Valiela, I., J.M. Teal, and W. Sass. 1973. Nutrient retention in salt marsh plots experimentally fertilized with sewage sludge. Estuarine Coastal Mar. Sci. 1:261–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Vogl, R. 1966. Salt marsh vegetation of upper Newport Bay, California. Ecology 47:80–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Winfield, T.P. 1980. Dynamics of carbon and nitrogen in a southern California salt marsh. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of California, Riverside-San Diego State University.Google Scholar
  29. Zedler, J.B. 1977. Salt marsh community structure in the Tijuana Estuary, California. Estuarine Coastal Mar. Sci. 5:39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zedler, J.B.. 1982. The ecology of southern California coastal salt marshes: a community profile. Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Services Program, Washington D.C. FWS/OBS-81/54. 110pp.Google Scholar
  31. Zedler, J.B.. 1983. Freshwater impacts in normally hypersaline marshes. Estuaries 6:346–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zedler, J.B., J. Covin, C. Nordby, P. Williams, and J. Boland. 1986. Catastrophic events reveal the dynamic nature of salt-marsh vegetation in Southern California. Estuaries 9(1):75–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zedler, J.B. and C.S. Nordby. 1986. The ecology of Tijuana Estuary, California: an estuarine profile. U.S. Fish Wildl. Scrv. Biol. Rep. 85(7.5). 104 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jordan D. Covin
    • 1
  • Joy B. Zedler
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologySan Diego State UniversitySan Diego

Personalised recommendations