Advertisement

Wetlands

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 299–315 | Cite as

A survey of constructed wetlands for acid coal mine drainage treatment in the Eastern United States

  • R. Kelman Wieder
Article

Abstract

The oxidation of pyritic minerals, exposed to oxygen and water during the mining of coal, results in the formation of acid mine drainage (AMD), which is characterized by low pH and high concentrations of dissolved sulfate, iron, and other metals. Federal and State regulations require that discharges from coal surface mines meet water quality criteria. Toward that end, chemical treatment of AMD, usually with soda ash briquettes, lime, limestone, or sodium hydroxide, is effective but expensive. Recently, man-made wetlands have been proposed as a low-cost, low-maintenance alternative to chemical treatment of AMD. To assess the status of man-made wetland treatment of AMD in the eastern U.S., a survey was conducted by the U.S. Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation, and Enforcement. As of May 1988, 142 wetlands had been constructed for AMD treatment. In 50% of the constructed wetlands, treatment efficiencies (reductions in concentration) for H+, acidity, Fe, Al, Mn, and SO4 2 of at least 68, 67, 81, 48, 34, and 8%, respectively, were obtained. However, over 11% of the constructed wetlands yielded greater concentrations in the effluent from the wetland than were present in the influent AMD for one or more of these 6 chemical parameters. Treatment efficiency generally was not correlated with design criteria (e.g., area of wetland, depth of the organic substrate in the wetland, AMD flow rate, metal loading rates). Also, treatment efficiency was generally not affected by either the type of organic substrate used in wetland construction or the addition of lime and/or fertilizer to the constructed wetland. The effectiveness of wetland treatment of AMD is not only extremely variable, but also presently not predictable.

Key Words

acid mine drainage constructed wetlands pollution water quality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Appalachian Regional Commission. 1969. Acid Mine Drainage in Appalachia. U.S. Congressional House Document No. 91-180. Volumes I–III, Appendix C.Google Scholar
  2. Barton, P. 1978. The acid mine drainage. p. 313–358.In J.O. Nriagu (ed.) Sulfur in the Environment. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  3. Brodie, G.A., D.A. Hammer, and D.A. Tomljanovich. 1988. Constructed wetlands for acid drainage control in the Tennessee Valley. p. 325–331.In Mine Drainage and Surface Mine Reclamation. U.S. Bureau of Mines Information Circular 9183.Google Scholar
  4. Brooks, R., D.E. Samuel, and J.B. Hill (eds.). 1985. Wetlands and Water Management on Mined Lands. Proceedings of a Conference, October 23–24, 1985. The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.Google Scholar
  5. Burris, J.E. (ed.). 1984. Treatment of Mine Drainage by Wetlands. Contribution No. 264, Department of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.Google Scholar
  6. Colmer, A.R. and M.E. Hinkle. 1947. The role of microorganisms in acid mine drainage. Science 106: 253–256.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fennessy, M.S. and W.J. Mitsch. 1989. Design and use of wetlands for renovation of drainage from coal mines. p. 231–253.In W.J. Mitsch and S.E. Jorgensen (eds.) Ecological Engineering: An Introduction to Ecotechnology. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  8. Girts, M.A. and R.L.P. Kleinmann. 1986. Constructed wetlands for treatment of acid mine drainage: A preliminary review. p. 165–171.In National Symposium on Surface Mining, Hydrology, Sedimentology, and Reclamation, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.Google Scholar
  9. Hammer, D.A. (ed.). 1989. Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment: Municipal, Industrial and Agricultural. Lewis Publishing, Chelsea, MI, USA.Google Scholar
  10. Henrot, J. and R.K. Wieder. 1990. Processes of Fe and Mn retention in laboratory peat microcosms subjected to acid mine drainage. Journal of Environmental Quality, in press.Google Scholar
  11. Huntsman, B.E., J.G. Solch, and M.D. Porter. 1978. Utilization ofSphagnum species dominated bog for acid coal mine drainage abatement. Abstracts: 91st Annual Meeting of the Geological Society of America, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  12. Kleinmann, R.L.P., T.O. Tiernan, J.G. Solch, and R.L. Harris. 1983. A low-cost, low-maintenance treatment system for acid mine drainage usingSphagnum moss and limestone. p. 241–245.In D.H. Graves (ed.) Symposium on Surface Mining, Hydrology, Sedimentology, and Reclamation, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.Google Scholar
  13. Kleinmann, R.L.P., R.P. Brooks, B.E. Huntsman, and B. Pesavento. 1986. Constructed wetlands for the treatment of mine water — Course notes. Short course at the 1986 National Symposium on Surface Mining, Hydrology, Sedimentology, and Reclamation, Lexington, KY, USA.Google Scholar
  14. Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation, and Enforcement. 1988. Use of Wetland Treatment Systems for Coal Mine Drainage. Directives System, Subject Number TSR-10, Transmittal Number 468. U.S. Department of the Interior, Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation, and Enforcement, Washington, D.C., USA.Google Scholar
  15. SAS. 1982. SAS Users Guide: Statistics, 1982 edition. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
  16. Singer, P.C. and W. Stumm. 1970. Acidic mine drainage: The rate-determining step. Science 167: 1121–1123.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. U.S. Bureau of Mines. 1988. Mine Drainage and Surface Mine Reclamation. Volume 1. Mine Water and Mine Waste. Proceedings of a Conference, April 19–21, 1988. U.S. Bureau of Mines Information Circular 9183.Google Scholar
  18. Wieder, R.K. and G.E. Lang 1982. Modification of acid mine drainage in a freshwater wetland. p. 43–53.In B.R. McDonald (ed.) Symposium on Wetlands of the Unglaciated Appalachian Region. West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.Google Scholar
  19. Wieder, R.K. 1988. Determining the capacity for metal retention in man-made wetlands constructed for treatment of coal mine drainage. p. 375–381.In Mine Drainage and Surface Mine Reclamation. U.S. Bureau of Mines Information Circular 9183.Google Scholar
  20. Wieder, R.K., G. Tchobanoglous, and R.W. Tuttle 1989. Preliminary considerations regarding constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. p. 297–305.In D.A. Hammer (ed.). Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment: Municipal, Industrial and Agricultural. Lewis Publishing., Chelsea, MI, USA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Kelman Wieder
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of BiologyVillanova UniversityVillanova
  2. 2.U.S. Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation, and EnforcementEastern Field OperationsPittsburgh

Personalised recommendations