Wetlands

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 232–241 | Cite as

Decomposition of silver maple (Acer saccharinum L.) woody debris in a central illinois bottomland forest

  • Nelson Chueng
  • Sandra Brown
Article

Abstract

The decomposition rate of silver maple (Acer saccharinum) woody debris was measured in a seasonally flooded mature wetland forest in central Illinois. Small diameter woody debris logs (5-cm diameter × 0.75-m long) of three successive decomposition classes (fresh, intermediate, and rotten) were placed in the floodplain for a period of 1.5 years. By incorporating a chronosequential design that extended the time frame to about 3.5 yr, the decomposition coefficient (k) of sample logs was estimated at 0.089 yr−1 with a half-life of 7.8 years. Mass loss by microbial activity and leaching was estimated at 90%, whereas fragmentation accounted for 10%. Nutrient analysis of the logs indicated that P and K seemed to be released, whereas N, Ca, and Mg were immobilized. Overall, Ca and N were found in significantly higher concentrations than other nutrients (Ca>N>>K>Mg>P). Because small diameter woody debris has limited quantities of nutrients and a long residence time, its role in this mature forested wetland does not seem to be a nutrient reservoir but rather a long-term organic matter storage pool.

Key Words

forested wetlands wood decomposition nutrient composition decomposition rate silver maple Acer saccharinum L. 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

literature cited

  1. Bartel-Ortiz, L.M. and M.B. David. 1988. Sulfur constituents and transformations in upland and floodplain forest soils. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 18:1106–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, S. and D.L. Peterson. 1983. Structural characteristics and biomass production of two Illinois bottomland forests. American Midland Naturalist 110:107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Browning, B.L. 1967. Methods of Wood Chemistry (vol I). John Wiley & Sons. New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  4. Chamie, J.P.M. and C.J. Richardson. 1978. Decomposition in Northern wetlands. p. 115–130.In R.E. Good, D.F. Whigham, and R.L. Simpson (eds.) Freshwater Wetlands: Ecological Processes and Management Potential. Academic Press, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  5. Christensen, O. 1984. The state of decay of woody liter determined by relative density. Oikos 42:211–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cowling, E.B. and W. Merrill. 1966. Nitrogen in wood and its role in wood deterioration. Canadian Journal of Botany 44:1539–1553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Day, F.P. Jr. 1982. Litter decomposition rates in the seasonally flooded Great Dismal Swamp. Ecology 63:670–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Day, F.P. Jr. 1989. Limits on decomposition in the periodically flooded, non-riverine Dismal Swamp. p. 153–156.In R.R. Sharitz and J.W. Gibbons (eds.) Freshwater Wetlands and Wildlife. CONF-8603101, DOE Symposium Series No. 61, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA, USA.Google Scholar
  9. Gabriel, W.J. 1991. Silver maple. p. 70–77.In R. Burns and B. Honkala (eds.) Silvies of North America. U.S. dept of Agriculture Forest Service Ag. Handbook 654, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  10. Harcombe, P.A., M.E. Harmon, and S.E. Greene. 1990. Changes in biomass and production over 53 years in a coastalPicea sitchensis-Tsuga heterophylla forest approaching maturity. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 20:1602–1609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harmon, M.E., J.F. Franklin, F.J. Swanson, P. Sollins, S.V. Gregory, J.D. Lattin, N.H. Anderson, S.P. Cline, N.G. Aumen, J.R. Sedell, G.W. Lienkaemper, K. Cromack, and K.W. Cummins. 1986. Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Advances in Ecological. Research 15:133–276.Google Scholar
  12. Jackson, M.L. 1958. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.Google Scholar
  13. Keller, E.A. and F.J. Swanson. 1979. Effectsof large organic material on channel form and fluvial processes. Earth Surface Processes 4:361–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Killingbeck, K.T. 1986. Litterfall dynamics and element use efficiency in a Kansas gallery forest. American Midland Naturalist 116:180–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kimmins, J.P. 1987. Forest Ecology. MacMillan Publishing Company, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  16. Lang, G.E. and R.T.T. Forman. 1978. Detrital dynamics in a mature oak forest: Hutcheson Memorial Forest, New Jersey. Ecology 59:580–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu, X. 1993. Impact of river flooding on soil resource distribution and stand dynamics in a bottomland forest, central Ilinois. M.S. Thesis. University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA.Google Scholar
  18. Lugo, A.E., S. Brown, and M.M. Brinson (eds.) 1990. Forested Wetlands. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company. New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  19. MacMillan, P.C. 1981. Log decomposition in Donaldson’s Woods, Spring Mill State Park, Indiana. American Midland Naturalist 106:335–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Majerus, K.A. 1980. The decomposition ofAcer saccharinum leaf litter in a central Illinois floodplain forest. M.S. Thesis. University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA.Google Scholar
  21. Malanson, G.P. and J.A. Kupfer. 1993. Simulated fate of leaf litter and large woody debris at a riparian cutbank. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 23:582–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Martin, W.S. 1991. Soil survey of Piatt County, Illinois, Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station Soil Report No. 134. Springfield, IL, USA.Google Scholar
  23. Olson, J.S. 1963. Energy storage and the balance of producers and decomposers in ecological systems. Ecology 44:322–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Parkinson, J.A. and S.E. Allen. 1975. A wet oxidation procedure suitable for the determination of nitrogen and mineral nutrients in biological material. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 6:1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Peterson, D.L. and G.L. Rolfe. 1982a. Nutrient dynamics and decomposition of litterfall in floodplain and upland forests of central Illinois. Forest Science 28:667–681.Google Scholar
  26. Peterson, D.L. and G.L. Rolfe. 1982b. Nutrient dynamics of herbaceous vegetation in upland and floodplain forest communities. American Midland Naturalist 107:325–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Polit, J.A. 1992. Structure and composition of woody debris in a central Illinois floodplain forest. M.S. Thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA.Google Scholar
  28. Rayner, A.D.M. and L. Boddy. 1988. Fungal Decomposition of Wood. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  29. Segal, D.S., R.H. Jones, and R.R. Sharitz. 1990. Release of NH4−N, NO3−N and PO4−P from litter in two bottomland hardwood forests. American Midland Naturalist 123:160–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shupe, T. 1993. An assessment of some of the chemical properties of ten year old short rotation hardwood biomass growth in Illinois. M.S. Thesis. University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA.Google Scholar
  31. Shure, D.J., M.R. Gottschalk, and K.A. Parsons. 1986. Litter decomposition processes in a floodplain forest. American Midland Naturalist 115:314–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sinsabaugh, R.L., R.K. Antibus, A.E. Linkins, C.A. McClaugherty, L. Rayburn, D. Repert, and T. Weiland. 1992. Wood decomposition over a first-oder watershed: Mass loss as a function of lignocellulase activity. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 24:743–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Smith, W.B. 1991. Assessing removals for North Central Forest Inventories. USDA-Forest Service Research Paper NC-299.Google Scholar
  34. Weider, R.K. and G.F. Lang. 1982. A critique of the analytical methods used in examining decomposition data obtained from litter bags. Ecology 63:1636–1642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zuehis, E.E., J.K. LaTour, and T.L. Wicker. 1994. USGS Water Resources Data—Illinois, volume 2. Illinois River Basin. USGS/WRD/HD-94/306. Urbana, IL, USA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nelson Chueng
    • 1
  • Sandra Brown
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ForestryUniversity of IllinoisUrbana
  2. 2.U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyCorvallis

Personalised recommendations