Wetlands

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 216–222 | Cite as

Peatland species preferences: An overview of our current knowledge base

  • L. Dennis Gignac
Article

Abstract

The autecology of several peatland plant species has been studied on a wide variety of gradients that include elevation relative to the water table, surface water chemistry, mire margin to mire expanse, shade, and climate. The accuracy with which species’ realized niches are defined and the ability to predict community structure as conditions change along gradients vary considerably between studies. Many studies have quantified species niche dimensions along individual gradients, and although they have the ability to predict species abundance and distribution, they do not account for synergistic effects between gradients. Other methods analyze two gradients simultaneously producing rectangles and ellipsoids, but these methods have limited predictive ability. A variety of ordination techniques are often used to analyze species preferences along several gradients simultaneously. However, with the exception of Detrended Canonical Correspondence Analysis, these methods have limited predictive ability because gradients are defined as ordination axes and it is difficult to analyze each gradient individually. Species response surfaces calculated along several gradients simultaneously offer a more accurate definition of species’ realized niche dimensions. Response surfaces can be used to predict baseline community structure along several gradients, but they do not integrate such biotic factors as competition and succession, as well as such disturbances as fire, pollution, and peat harvesting.

Key Words

peatlands species preference climate change gradients 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Andrus, R.E. 1986. Some aspects ofSphagnum ecology. Canadian Journal of Botany 64:416–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrus, R.E., D.J. Wagner, and J.E. Titus. 1983. Vertical zonation ofSphagnum mosses along hummock-hollow gradients. Canadian Journal of Botany 64:416–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Daniels, R.E. and A. Eddy. 1985. Handbook of European Sphagna. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Abbots Ripton, National Environment Research Council, Great Britain.Google Scholar
  4. Damman, A.W.H. and J.J. Dowhan. 1981. Vegetation and habitat conditions in Western Head Bog, a southern Nova Scotian plateau bog. Canadian Journal of Botany 59:1343–1359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dierssen, K. 1983. Zur Verbreitung und Soziologie vonSphagnum riparium Ångstr. in Mitteleuropa. Andrias 2:9–22.Google Scholar
  6. Gignac, L.D. 1989. Ecological tolerance and niche structure ofSphagnum along a pollution gradient near Sudbury, Ontario, Canada. Canadian Journal of Botany 65:1268–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gignac, L.D. 1992. Habitat niches of mire bryophytes along climatic and ecological gradients in western Canada. The Bryologist 95:406–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gignac, L.D. 1993. Distribution ofSphagnum spectes, communities, and habitats in relation to climate. In: N.G. Miller (ed.), Advances in Bryology 5:187–192. J. Cramer, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
  9. Gignac, L.D. and D.H. Vitt. 1990. Habitat limitations ofSphagnum along climatic, chemical, and physical gradients. The Bryologist 93:7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gignac, L.D., D.H. Vitt, and S.E. Bayley. 1991a. Bryophyte response surfaces along ecological and climatic gradients. Vegetatio 93:29–45.Google Scholar
  11. Gignac, L.D., D.H. Vitt, S.C. Zoltai, and S.E. Bayley. 1991b. Bryophyte response surfaces along climatic, chemical, and physical gradients in peatlands of western Canada. Nova Hedwigia 53:27–71.Google Scholar
  12. Glaser, P.H. 1987. The ecology of patterned boreal peatlands of northern Minnesota: a community profile. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior. Washington, DC, USA. Biological Report 85(7.14).Google Scholar
  13. Jongman, R.H.G., G.J.F. ter Braak, and O.F.R. van Tongeren. 1987. Data Analysis in Community and Landseape Ecology. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation. Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  14. Mitchell, J.F.B., S. Manabe, V. Meleshko, and T. Toroka. 1990. Equilibrium climate change and its implications for the future. p. 134–172. In: J.T. Houghton, G.J. Jenkins, and J.J. Ephraums (eds.) Climate Change, The IPCC Scientific Assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Great Britain.Google Scholar
  15. Økland, R.H. 1990. A phytoecological study of the mire Northern Kisselbergmossen, SE Norway. III. Diversity and habitat niche relationships. Nordic Journal of Botany 10:191–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Slack, N. G., D. H. Vitt, and D. G. Horton. 1980. Vegetation gradients of minerotrophically rich fens in western Alberta. Canadian Journal of Botany 58:330–350.Google Scholar
  17. ter Braak, C.J.F. 1987. The analysis of vegetation-environment relationships by canonical correspondence analysis. Vegetatio 69: 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. ter Braak, C.J.F. and C.W.N. Looman. 1986. Weighted averaging, logistic regression and the Gaussian response model. Vegetatio 65: 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Vitt, D. H. and S. Bayley. 1984. the vegetation and water chemistry of four oligotrophic basin mires in northwestern Ontario. Canadian Journal of Botany 62:1485–1500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Vitt, D. H. and W.-L. Chee. 1989. The vegetation, surface water chemistry, and peat chemistry of moderate-rich fens in central Alberta, Canada. Wetlands 9:227–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Vitt, D.H., H. Crum, and J.A. Snider. 1975. The vertical zonation ofSphagnum species in hummock-hollow complexes in Northern Michigan. Michigan Botanist 14:190–200.Google Scholar
  22. Vitt, D. H. and N. G. Slack. 1975. An analysis of the vegetation ofSphagnum-dominated kettle-hole bogs in relation to environmental gradients. Canadian Journal of Botany 53:332–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vitt, D. H. and N. G. Slack. 1984. Niche diversification ofSphagnum relative to environmental factors in northern Minnesota peatlands. Canadian Journal of Botany 62:1409–1430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wheeler, G.A., P.H. Glaser, E. Gorham, C.M. Wetmore, F.D. Bowers, and J.A. Janssens. 1983. Contibutions to the flora of the Red Lake Peatland, northern Minnesota, with special attention toCarex. American Midland Naturalist 110:62–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Dennis Gignac
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculté Saint-JeanUniversity of AlbertaEdmonton

Personalised recommendations