Wetlands

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 147–158 | Cite as

Growth ofChamaedaphne calyculata at two peatland sites in relation to nutrient availability

  • Ingrid Bartsch
  • Christa Schwintzer
Article
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:

Abstract

Biomass production, length of current-season shoots, number of new shoots produced per plant, reproductive effort, and tissue-nutrient concentrations of the ericaceous evergreenChamaedaphne calyculata (leatherleaf) were determined at two acidic peatland sites. Measurements were made under unfertilized conditions and following the addition of NPK over two conscutive years. The “shrub” site, a poor fen, had a deeper aerobic zone during most of the growing season, larger pools of N, P, K, Ca, and Mg within the surface peat (0–30 cm) and the leatherleaf biomass, and greater amounts of extractable P and K within the peat. At the poor fen, taller leatherleaf shrubs had significantly more biomass and longer shoots, and more flowers and fruits were produced. At the “open” site, a bog, leatherleaf plants doubled biomass productivity, shoot length, and allocation to reproductive structures, and increased the concentration of N, P, and K in current shoots in response to the additions of NPK. In contrast, leatherleaf at the poor fen site responded to the addition of NPK by only increasing the concentration of N, P, and K in the current shoots. These results suggest that the growth of leatherleaf may be limited by the availability of N, P, and/or K in bogs but not in poor fens.

Key Words

Chamaedaphne calyculata biomass production acidic peatland nutrient availability nutrient addition 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Aerts, R. 1990. Nutrient use efficiency in evergeen and deciduous species from heathlands. Oecologia 84:391–397.Google Scholar
  2. Aerts, R. and F. Berendse. 1988. The effect of increased nutrient availability on vegetation dynamics in wet heathlands. Vegetatic 76:63–69.Google Scholar
  3. Aerts, R. and H. de Caluwe. 1989. Aboveground productivity and nutrient turnover ofMolinia caerulea along and experimental gradient of nutrient availability. Oikos 54:320–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ali, M. W., S. C. Zoltai, and F. G. Radford. 1988. A comparison of dry and wet ashing methods for the elemental analysis of peat. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 68:443–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allen, S. E., H. M. Grimshaw, and A. P. Rowland. 1986. Chemical Analyses. p. 285–344.In P. D. Moore and S. B. Chapman (eds.) Methods in Plant Ecology. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  6. Andrus, R. E. 1980. Sphagnaceae (peat moss family) of New York State. New York State Museum Bulletin No. 442. The State Education Department Albany, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  7. Armstrong, W. 1982. Waterlogged Soils. p. 290–330.In J. R. Etherington (ed.) Environment and Plant Ecology. John Wiley and Sons, London, UK.Google Scholar
  8. Bartsch, I. 1991. Effects of Nutrient Addition on Growth and Nutrient Use by Leatherleaf andSphagnum spp. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Maine, Orono, ME, USA.Google Scholar
  9. Berendse, F., B. Beltman, R. Bobbink, R. Kwant, and M. Schmitz. 1987. Primary production and nutrient availability in wet heathland ecosystems. Acta Oecologia 8:265–279.Google Scholar
  10. Bergersen, F. J. 1980. Measurement of nitrogen fixation by direct means. p. 65–110.In F. J. Bergersen (ed.) Methods for Evaluating Biological Nitrogen Fixation. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
  11. Bradbury, I. K. and J. Grace. 1983. Primary Production in Wetlands. p. 285–310.In A. J. P. Gore (ed.) Ecosystems of the World 4A, Mires: Swamp, Bog, Fen and Moor. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  12. Brinson, M. M., A. E. Lugo, and S. Brown. 1981. Primary production, decomposition, and consumer activity in freshwater wetlands. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 12:123–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cameron, C. C., M. K. Mullen, C. A. Lepage, and W. A. Anderson, 1980. Peat Resources of Maine, Volume 2: Penobscot County. Maine Geologic Survey Peat Publications, Bulletin 29. Augusta, ME, USA.Google Scholar
  14. Chamie, J. P. M. and C. J. Richardson. 1978. Decomposition in Northern Wetlands. p. 115–130.In R. E. Good (ed.) Freshwater Wetlands. Academic Press, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  15. Chapin, F. S. 1988. Ecological aspects of plant mineral nutrition. Advances in Mineral Nutrition 3:161–191.Google Scholar
  16. Chapin, F. S., W. C. Oechel, K. VanCleve, and W. Lawrence. 1987. The role of mosses in the phosphorus cycling of an Alaskan black spruce forest. Oecologia 74:310–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chapin, F. S. and G. R. Shaver. 1989. Differences in growth and nutrient use among aretic growth forms. Functional Ecology 3:73–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chapin, F.S., P.M. Vitousek, and K. van Cleve. 1986. The nature of nutrient limitation in plant communities. American Naturalist 127:48–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clymo, R.S. 1963. Ion exchange inSphagnum and its relation to bog ecology. Annals of Botany 27:309–324.Google Scholar
  20. Clymo, R. S. 1965. Experiments on the breakdown ofSphagnum. Journal of Ecology 53:747–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Damman, A. W. H. 1977. Geographical changes in the vegetation pattern of raised bogs in the Bay of Fundy region of Maine and New Brunswick. Vegetatio 35:137–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Damman, A. W. H. 1988. Regulation of nitrogen removal and retention inSphagnum bogs and other peatlands. Oikos 51:291–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fernald, M. L. 1950. Gray’s Manual of Botany 8th Edition. American Book Co., New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  24. Glaser, P. H., J. A. Janssens, and D. I. Siegel. 1990. The response of vegetation to chemical and hydrological gradients in the Lost River Peatland, northern Minnesota. Journal of Ecology 78:1021–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Glaser, P. H., G. A. Wheeler, E. Gorham, and H. E. Wright. 1981. The patterned mires of the Red Lake Peatland northern Minnesota: Vegetation, water chemistry, and landforms. Journal of Ecology 69:575–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goodman, G. T. and D. F. Perkins. 1968. The role of mineral nutrients inEriophorum communities. IV. Potassium supply as a limiting factor in anE. vaginatum community. Journal of Ecology 56:685–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gore, A J. P. 1963. Factors limiting plant growth on high level peat. III. An analysis of growth ofMolinia caerula (L.) Moench. in the second year. Journal of Ecology 51:481–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gorham, E., S. J. Eisenreich, J. Ford, and M. V. Santelmann. 1985. The chemistry of bog waters. p. 339–363.In W. Strumm (ed.) Chemical Processes in Lakes. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  29. Grime, J. P. 1977. Evidence for the coexistence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. American Naturalist 114:1169–1194.Google Scholar
  30. Hayati, A. A. and M. C. F. Proctor. 1990. Plant distribution in relation to mineral nutrient availability and uptake on a wet heath site in southwest England. Journal of Ecology 78:134–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hayati, A. A. and M. C. F. Proctor. 1991. Limiting nutrients in acid-mire vegetation: peat and plant analyses and experiments on plant responses to added nutrients. Journal of Ecology 79:75–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hemond, H. 1983. The nitrogen budget of Thoreau’s Bog, Concord, Massachusetts, USA. Ecology 64:99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jacobson, G. L., Jr., L. Widoff, D. S. Anderson, and R. B. Davis. 1994. The vegetation of three Maine peatlands: Caribou Bog, Crystal Bog, and the Great Heath. Maine Geological Survey, Bulletin 35. Augusta, ME, USA.Google Scholar
  34. Kenkel, N. C. 1987. Trends and interrelationships in boreal wetland vegetation. Canadian Journal of Botany 65:12–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lieffers, V. J. and S. E. Macdonald. 1990. Growth and foliar nutrient status of black spruce and tamarack in relation to depth of water table in some Alberta peatlands. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 20:805–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Malmer, N. 1986. Vegetational gradients in relation to environmental conditions in northwestern European mires. Canadian Journal of Botany 64:375–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Malmer, N. and E. Holm. 1984. Variation in the C/N quotient of peat in relation to decomposition rate and age determination with210Pb. Oikos 43:171–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Moore, P. D. and D. J. Bellamy. 1974. Reatlands. Elek Science, London, UK.Google Scholar
  39. Moore, T. R. 1989. Plant production, decomposition, and carbon efflux in a subarctic patterned fen. Arctic and Alpine Research 21: 156–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. National Atmospheric Deposition Program. 1991. Annual Data Summary, Precipitation Chemistry in the United States, Greenville Station, ME, USA.Google Scholar
  41. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 1990. Loca Climatological Data, NOAA National Climate Program Office, Asheville, NC, USA.Google Scholar
  42. Neill, C. 1990. Effects of nutrients and water levels on species composition in prairie whitetop (Scolochloa festucacea) marshes. Canadian Journal of Botany 68:1015–1020.Google Scholar
  43. Pastor, J., J. D. Aber, C. A. McClaugherty, and J. M. Melillo. 1984. Aboveground production and N and P cycling along a nitrogen mineralization gradient on Blackhawk Island, Wisconsin. Ecology 65:256–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Reader, R.J. 1982. Geographic variation in the shoot productivity of hog shrubs and some environmental correlates. Canadian Journal of Botany 60:340–348.Google Scholar
  45. Rochefort, L., D. H. Vitt, and S. E. Bayley. 1990. Growth, production, and decomposition dynamics ofSphagnum under natural and experimentally acidified conditions. Ecology 71:1986–2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. SAS. 1985. SAS User’s Guide: Statistics, Version 5 Edition. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
  47. Schuster, R. M. 1974. The Hepaticae and Anthocerotae of North America. Columbia University Press, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  48. Schwintzer, C. R. 1981. Wegetation and nutrient status of northern Michigan bogs and conifer swamps with a comparison to fens. Canadian Journal of Botany 59:842–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schwintzer, C. R. 1983. Primary productivity and nitrogen, carbon, and biomass distribution in a denseMyrica gale stand. Canadian Journal of Botany 61:2943–2948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schwintzer, C. R. and S. A. Lancelle. 1983. Effect of water table depth on shoot growth, root growth, and nodulation ofMyrica gale. Journal of Ecology 71:489–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Segadas-Vianna, F. 1955. Ecological study of the peat bogs of eastern North America. II. TheChamaedaphne calyculata community in Quebec and Ontario. Canadian Journal of Botany 33: 647–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sheikh, K. H. 1969. The effects of competition and nutriton on the inter-relations of some weat-heath plants. Journal of Ecology 57:87–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sjörs, H. 1950. On the relation between vegetation and electrolytes in North Swedish mire waters. Oikos 2:241–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Small, E. 1972. Photosynthetic rates in relation to nitrogen recycling as an adaptation to nutrient: deficiency in peat bog plants. Canadian Journal of Botany 50:2227–2233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Summerfield, R. J. 1974. The reliability of mire water chemical analysis data as an index of plant nutrient availability. J. Plant and Soil 40:97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tamm, C. O. 1954. Some observations on the nutrient turnover in a bog community dominated byEriophorum vaginatum L. Oikos 5:189–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tilton, D. 1978. Comparative growth and foliar clement concentrations ofLarix laricina over a range of wetland types in Minnesota. Journal of Ecology 66:499–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vasander, H. 1982. Plant biomass and production in virgin, drained, and fertilized sites in a raised bog in southern Finland. Annales Botanici Fennici 19:103–125.Google Scholar
  59. Verhoeven, J. T. A. and H. H. M. Arts. 1987. Nutrient dynamics in small mesotrophic fens surrounded by cultivated land. II. N and P accumulation in plant biomass in response to the release of inorganic N and P. Oecologia 72:557–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Verhoeven, J. T. A., E. Maltby, and M. B. Schmitz. 1990. Nitrogen and phosphorus mineralization in fens and bogs. Journal of Ecology 78:713–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Vitt, D. H. 1990. Growth and production dynamics of boreal mosses over climatic, chemical and topographic gradients. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 104:35–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Vitt, D. H. and S. Bayley. 1984. The vegetation and water chemistry of four oligotrophic basin mires in northwestern Ontario. Canadian Journal of Botany 62:1485–1500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Whittaker, R. H. 1975. Communities and Ecosystems. Second Edition. MacMillan Publishing Co., New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  64. Worley, I. A. 1981. Maine Peatlands: Their Abundance, Ecology, and Relevance to the Critical Areas Program. Maine State Planning Office, Critical Areas Program, Planning Report 73. Augusta, ME, USA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ingrid Bartsch
    • 1
  • Christa Schwintzer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant Biology and PathologyUniversity of MaineOronoUSA

Personalised recommendations