Finite range Coulomb stripping in (t, p) and (He3, n) reactions

  • M. El-Nadi
  • A. Osman
  • T. H. Rihan
Article
Received:

Abstract

The theory of two-nucleon stripping reactions in considered, taking into account the Coulomb distortion and the finite-range effects at projectile energies below the Coulomb barrier. Applying the results to the reactions N14(t, p)N16 and Be9(He3, n)C11 reliable agreement is observed with the experimental data especially in the forward direction.

Keywords

Angular Distribution Coulomb Barrier Residual Nucleus Projectile Energy Outgoing Particle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Кулоновская реакция срыва (t, p) и (He3, n) с конечным радиусом взаимодействия

Резюме

Рассматривается теория двухнуклонной реакции срыва, с учетом эффектов кулоновского искажения и конечного радиуса при пристрельной энергии под кулоновским барьером. Применяя результаты для реакции N14(t, p)N16 и Be9(He3, n)C11, наблюдается соответствие с экспериментальными данными особенно в направлении падающего пучка.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    K. Ter-Martirosian, Soviet Physics JETP,2, 620, 1956.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. C. Biedenharn, K. Boyer andM. Goldstein, Phys. Rev.,104, 383, 1956.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Dar, A. De-Shalit andA. S. Reiner, Phys. Rev.,131, 1732, 1963.MATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. El-Nadi andT. H. Rihan, Proc. Phys. Soc.,87, 119, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. J. A. Buttle andL. J. B. Goldfarb, Proc. Phys. Soc.,83, 701, 1964.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. El-Nadi, Proc. Phys. Soc.,A70, 62, 1957.MATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. C. Newns, Proc. Phys. Soc.,76, 489, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    N. K. Glendenning, Nucl. Phys.,29, 109, 1962.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. B. Schwartz, H. D. Holmgren, L. M. Cameron andA. R. Knudson, Phys. Rev.,134, B 577, 1964.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. L. Duggan, P. D. Miller andR. F. Gabbard, Nucl. Phys.,46, 336, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Moshinsky, Nucl. Phys.,13, 104, 1959.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    F. B. Morinigo, Phys. Rev.,134, B 1243, 1964.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. El-Nadi andH. Sherif, Nucl. Phys.,28, 331, 1961.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. E. Rose, “Elementary Theory of Angular Momentum” (John Wiley, New York), 1957.MATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    I. N. Snaddon, “Special Functions of Mathematical Physics and Chemistry” (Interscience Publishers INC., New York), 1956.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. Jucys, T. Levinson andV. Vanages, “Mathematical apparatus of the theory of angular momentum” (Vilnius, 1960).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. P. Eliott andB. H. Flowers, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London),A242, 57, 1957.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© with the authors 1970

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. El-Nadi
    • 1
  • A. Osman
    • 1
  • T. H. Rihan
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of ScienceCairo UniversityCairoUAR
  2. 2.Atomic Energy EstablishmentCairoUAR

Personalised recommendations