Advertisement

Netherlands Heart Journal

, Volume 16, Issue 6, pp 191–196 | Cite as

Chest pain in the emergency room: value of the HEART score

  • A. J. Six
  • B. E. Backus
  • J. C. Kelder
original article
chest pain acute coronary syndrome emergency room 

Abstract

Background. Chest pain is one of the most common causes of presentation to the emergency room. The diagnosis of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome typically causes uncertainty. Classical considerations for risk stratification are History, ECG, Age, Risk factors and Troponin (HEART). Each can be scored with zero, one or two points, depending on the extent of the abnormality. The HEART score is the sum of these five considerations. Methods. Clinical data from 122 patients referred to the emergency room for chest pain were analysed. The predictive value of the HEART score for reaching an endpoint was evaluated in 120/122 patients.

Results. Twenty-nine patients reached one or more endpoints: an acute myocardial infarction was diagnosed in 16 patients, 20 underwent revascularisation and two died. The HEART score in the patients with and without an endpoint was 6.51±1.84 and 3.71±1.83 (p<0.0001) respectively. A HEART score of 0-3 points holds a risk of 2.5% for an endpoint and supports an immediate discharge. With a risk of 20.3%, a HEART score of 4-6 points implies admission for clinical observation. A HEART score ≥7points, with a risk of 72.7%, supports early invasive strategies.

Conclusion. The HEART score facilitates accurate diagnostic and therapeutic choices. The HEART score is an easy, quick and reliable predictor of outcome in chest pain patients. (Neth Heart J 2008;16:191-6.)

References

  1. 1.
    Cannon CP, Braunwald E. Unstable angina and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction. In Zipes, Libby, Bonow and Braunwald (eds.): Braunwald’s Heart Disease. A textbook of cardiovascular medicine. Elsevier Saunders 2005. pp 1243-79.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hirsch A, Windhausen F, Thijssen JGP, Verheugt FWA, Cornel JH, De Winter RJ. Long-term outcome after an early invasive versus selective invasive treatment strategy in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome and elevated cardiac troponin T (the ICTUS trial): a follow-up study. Lancet 2007;369:827-35.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Miller CD, Lindsell CJ, Khandelwal S, et al. Is the initial diagnostic impression of “Noncardiac Chest Pain” adequate to exclude cardiac disease? Ann Emerg Med 2004;44:565-74.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blackburn H, Keys A, Simonson E, et. The electrocardiogram in population studies: a classification system. Circulation 1960;21:1160-75.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hollander JE. Acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department: Diagnosis, risk stratification, and management. In: P Théroux (Ed.): Acute coronary syndromes. A companion to Braunwald’s heart disease. Saunders/Elsevier, 2003.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non–ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:e1-157.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bassand JP, Hamm CW, Ardessino D, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non ST-segment elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes. Eur Heart J 2007;28:1598-660.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Apgar V. A Proposal for a New Method of Evaluation of the Newborn Infant. Current Researches in Anesthesia and Analgesia, July-August, 1953, page 260.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Antman EM, Cohen Mk Bernink PJLM, et al. The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/ non-ST elevation MI. JAMA 2000; 284:835-42.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Boersma E, Pieper KS, Steyerberg EW, et al. for the PURSUIT investigators. Predictors of outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment elevation. Results from an international trial of 9461 patients. Circulation 2000;101:2557-67.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Granger CB, Goldberg RJ, Dabbous OH, et al. for the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events Investigators. Predictors of hospital mortality in the global registry of acute coronary events. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:2345-53.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fox KA, Dabbous OH, Goldberg RJ, et al. Prediction of risk of death and myocardial infarction in the six months after presentation with acute coronary syndrome: prospective multinational observational study (GRACE). BMJ 2006;333:1091.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    De Araújo Gonçalves P, Ferreira J, Aguiar C, Seabra-Gomes R. TIMI, PURSUIT, and GRACE risk scores: sustained prognostic value and interaction with revascularization in NSTE-ACS. Eur Heart J 2005;26:865-72.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.

Personalised recommendations