Advertisement

Huisarts en wetenschap

, Volume 44, Issue 11, pp 171–171 | Cite as

Richtlijnen voor RCT's en systematische reviews

Journaal
  • 65 Downloads

Literatuur

  1. Harbour R, Miller J. A new system for grading recommendations in evidence based guidelines. BMJ 2001;323:334-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D, et al. The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomised trials: explanation and elobartion. Ann Intern Med 2001:134:663-94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Moher D Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF.Improving the quality or reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOR-OM statement. Lancet 1999;354:1896-1900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology. A proposal for reporting. JAMA 2000;283:2008-12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2001

Personalised recommendations